Literature DB >> 24150508

Evolution of Point-of-Care Testing in Australia.

Rosy Tirimacco1.   

Abstract

Currently no mandatory standards or guidelines exist for Point-of-Care Testing (PoCT) in Australia. In 2001, a report on the role and value of 'near patient testing' in general practice outlined work that was required to assist the Australian Government to decide how to manage PoCT. Phillips Fox reported that adoption of mandatory accreditation requirements was not justified by the level of risk associated with PoCT. If implemented appropriately, PoCT could be useful with frontline management of chronic disease, relieving stress on general practice and expanding the reach of pathology. Interim PoCT standards in general practice were developed by a Quality Use of Pathology committee, and formed an accreditation framework for the PoCT in General Practice Trial. This trial concluded that PoCT has a role in supporting the primary healthcare team to manage chronic disease patients. While results of the trial are still being considered, the potential impact of funding PoCT in general practice is being treated as part of the wider review of pathology funding currently taking place in Australia. Although Australia has local models from which to draw experience, it has yet to decide the quality framework it would adopt if it was to roll out PoCT in general practice. The quality framework that Australia adopts for PoCT must achieve high quality pathology results that enhance clinical care.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 24150508      PMCID: PMC2924125     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev        ISSN: 0159-8090


  8 in total

1.  Point of care testing.

Authors:  James H Nichols
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.935

2.  The Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health (BEACH) program may be left high and dry.

Authors:  Lesley Russell; Stephen R Leeder
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  Addressing general practice workforce shortages: policy options.

Authors:  Jill E Thistlethwaite; Stephen R Leeder; Michael R Kidd; Tim Shaw
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 7.738

4.  Rural pathology under the microscope.

Authors:  Helen Cameron; Philip Dupal
Journal:  Aust J Rural Health       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.662

Review 5.  Point-of-care testing for patients with diabetes, hyperlipidaemia or coagulation disorders in the general practice setting: a systematic review.

Authors:  Angela Gialamas; Andrew St John; Caroline Olivia Laurence; Tanya Kaye Bubner
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 2.267

6.  Meeting the challenge of chronic illness in general practice.

Authors:  Bronwyn M Veale
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  Care of patients with chronic disease: the challenge for general practice.

Authors:  Mark F Harris; Nicholas A Zwar
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting - rationale, design and baseline characteristics.

Authors:  Caroline Laurence; Angela Gialamas; Lisa Yelland; Tanya Bubner; Philip Ryan; Kristyn Willson; Briony Glastonbury; Janice Gill; Mark Shephard; Justin Beilby
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 2.279

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Virtual Support of a Point of Care Testing Network.

Authors:  R Tirimacco; P Cowley; A St John; L Siew; P Tideman
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2014-09-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.