Literature DB >> 24150041

Critical evaluation of auditory event-related potential deficits in schizophrenia: evidence from large-scale single-subject pattern classification.

Andres H Neuhaus1, Florin C Popescu2, Johannes Rentzsch3, Jürgen Gallinat3.   

Abstract

Event-related potential (ERP) deficits associated with auditory oddball and click-conditioning paradigms are among the most consistent findings in schizophrenia and are discussed as potential biomarkers. However, it is unclear to what extend these ERP deficits distinguish between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls on a single-subject level, which is of high importance for potential translation to clinical routine. Here, we investigated 144 schizophrenia patients and 144 matched controls with an auditory click-conditioning/oddball paradigm. P50 and N1 gating ratios as well as target-locked N1 and P3 components were submitted to conventional general linear models and to explorative machine learning algorithms. Repeated-measures ANOVAs revealed significant between-group differences for the oddball-locked N1 and P3 components but not for any gating measure. Machine learning-assisted analysis achieved 77.7% balanced classification accuracy using a combination of target-locked N1 and P3 amplitudes as classifiers. The superiority of machine learning over repeated-measures analysis for classifying schizophrenia patients was in the range of about 10% as quantified by receiver operating characteristics. For the first time, our study provides large-scale single-subject classification data on auditory click-conditioning and oddball paradigms in schizophrenia. Although our study exemplifies how automated inference may substantially improve classification accuracy, our data also show that the investigated ERP measures show comparably poor discriminatory properties in single subjects, thus illustrating the need to establish either new analytical approaches for these paradigms or other paradigms to investigate the disorder.
© The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  N1/N100; P3/P300; auditory oddball; click; conditioning; event-related potentials; gating; machine learning; schizophrenia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24150041      PMCID: PMC4133667          DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbt151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Bull        ISSN: 0586-7614            Impact factor:   9.306


  46 in total

1.  The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia.

Authors:  S R Kay; A Fiszbein; L A Opler
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Reliability of P50 auditory event-related potential indices of sensory gating.

Authors:  D A Smith; N N Boutros; S B Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Sensory gating deviance in schizophrenia in the context of task related effects.

Authors:  Y Guterman; R C Josiassen
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  Sensory gating in normals and schizophrenics: a failure to find strong P50 suppression in normals.

Authors:  N Kathmann; R R Engel
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1990-06-01       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 5.  Information processing and attention dysfunctions in schizophrenia.

Authors:  D L Braff
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Neurophysiological evidence for a defect in neuronal mechanisms involved in sensory gating in schizophrenia.

Authors:  L E Adler; E Pachtman; R D Franks; M Pecevich; M C Waldo; R Freedman
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  Why has it taken so long for biological psychiatry to develop clinical tests and what to do about it?

Authors:  S Kapur; A G Phillips; T R Insel
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 15.992

8.  The P50 component of the auditory evoked potential and subtypes of schizophrenia.

Authors:  N Boutros; G Zouridakis; T Rustin; C Peabody; D Warner
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.222

9.  Single-subject classification of schizophrenia using event-related potentials obtained during auditory and visual oddball paradigms.

Authors:  Andres H Neuhaus; Florin C Popescu; John A Bates; Terry E Goldberg; Anil K Malhotra
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 5.270

10.  Meta-analysis of the P300 and P50 waveforms in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Elvira Bramon; Sophia Rabe-Hesketh; Pak Sham; Robin M Murray; Sophia Frangou
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  The development of the N1 and N2 components in auditory oddball paradigms: a systematic review with narrative analysis and suggested normative values.

Authors:  David Tomé; Fernando Barbosa; Kamila Nowak; João Marques-Teixeira
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  Single-subject prediction of response inhibition behavior by event-related potentials.

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Stock; Florin Popescu; Andres H Neuhaus; Christian Beste
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Early auditory processing evoked potentials (N100) show a continuum of blunting from clinical high risk to psychosis in a pediatric sample.

Authors:  Joseph Gonzalez-Heydrich; Michelle Bosquet Enlow; Eugene D'Angelo; Larry J Seidman; Sarah Gumlak; April Kim; Kristen A Woodberry; Ashley Rober; Sahil Tembulkar; Kelsey Graber; Kyle O'Donnell; Hesham M Hamoda; Kara Kimball; Alexander Rotenberg; Lindsay M Oberman; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Matcheri S Keshavan; Frank H Duffy
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Schizophrenia detection and classification by advanced analysis of EEG recordings using a single electrode approach.

Authors:  Zack Dvey-Aharon; Noa Fogelson; Avi Peled; Nathan Intrator
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Does temporal irregularity drive prediction failure in schizophrenia? temporal modelling of ERPs.

Authors:  Maria Karanikolaou; Jakub Limanowski; Georg Northoff
Journal:  Schizophrenia (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-03-17

6.  Machine Learning Techniques for the Diagnosis of Schizophrenia Based on Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Elsa Santos Febles; Marlis Ontivero Ortega; Michell Valdés Sosa; Hichem Sahli
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 7.  Schizophrenia: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence Techniques Applied to Detection and Classification.

Authors:  Joel Weijia Lai; Candice Ke En Ang; U Rajendra Acharya; Kang Hao Cheong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  N100 Repetition Suppression Indexes Neuroplastic Defects in Clinical High Risk and Psychotic Youth.

Authors:  Joseph Gonzalez-Heydrich; Michelle Bosquet Enlow; Eugene D'Angelo; Larry J Seidman; Sarah Gumlak; April Kim; Kristen A Woodberry; Ashley Rober; Sahil Tembulkar; Kyle O'Donnell; Hesham M Hamoda; Kara Kimball; Alexander Rotenberg; Lindsay M Oberman; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Matcheri S Keshavan; Frank H Duffy
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Auditory prediction errors as individual biomarkers of schizophrenia.

Authors:  J A Taylor; N Matthews; P T Michie; M J Rosa; M I Garrido
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.881

10.  P50, N100, and P200 Auditory Sensory Gating Deficits in Schizophrenia Patients.

Authors:  Chen-Lan Shen; Tai-Li Chou; Wen-Sung Lai; Ming H Hsieh; Chen-Chung Liu; Chih-Min Liu; Hai-Gwo Hwu
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 4.157

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.