| Literature DB >> 24148965 |
Priyanga Ranasinghe1, Shehani Pigera, G A Sirimal Premakumara, Priyadarshani Galappaththy, Godwin R Constantine, Prasad Katulanda.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In traditional medicine Cinnamon is considered a remedy for respiratory, digestive and gynaecological ailments. In-vitro and in-vivo studies from different parts of the world have demonstrated numerous beneficial medicinal effects of Cinnamomum zeylanicum (CZ). This paper aims to systematically review the scientific literature and provide a comprehensive summary on the potential medicinal benefits of CZ.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24148965 PMCID: PMC3854496 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-13-275
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Figure 1Summarized search strategy.
Anti-microbial properties of
| Agasthya AS, et al. [ | CZ extract were active only against | |
| India | ||
| Barattha MT, et al. [ | Volatile oils from CZ had significant activity against the growth of food poisoning organisms, food spoilage organisms and organisms of faecal origin | |
| UK, Italy, Portugal | ||
| Bayoub K, et al. [ | CZ extracts demonstrated significant inhibitory effects on | |
| Morocco | ||
| Bhatia M, et al. [ | Among all spices tested CZ inhibited | |
| India | ||
| Carmo ES, et al. [ | Aspergillus species ( | CZ essential oil possesses strong anti-aspergillus activity inhibiting the growth, spore germination and causing deleterious cellular morphological changes |
| Brazil | ||
| Dubey RC, et al. [ | CZ essential oils inhibited growth of all organisms. Gram-negative organisms were more susceptible than gram-positive ones. | |
| India | ||
| Elumalai S, et al. [ | Percentage inhibition with CZ was; | |
| India | ||
| Fabio A, et al. [ | Of the 13 essential oils evaluated CZ and thyme showed the highest activity inhibiting all the strains studied | |
| Italy | ||
| Ferhout H, et al. [ | Of the 3 oils studied CZ oil exhibited the strongest activity towards the two yeasts. M. furfur showed a greater sensitivity to CZ | |
| France | ||
| Gonçalves JLS, et al. [ | Human rota-virus | CZ leaves and bark was able to inhibit the propagation of human rotavirus 32.4% and 33.9% respectively. |
| Brazil | ||
| Guerra FQS, et al. [ | Acinetobacter spp. | CZ essential oils suppresses the growth of Acinetobacter spp. and a synergistic effect was observed when combined with antibiotics |
| Brazil | ||
| Hosseininejad Z, et al. [ | CZ exhibited the most inhibitory effect on | |
| Iran | ||
| Jantan IB, et al. [ | Among all the essential oils, the leaf and bark oils of CZ showed the highest activity against all the fungi with MIC values of 0.04 to 0.63 μg μL−1 | |
| Malaysia | ||
| Jirovetz L, et al. [ | CZ essential oils were active against | |
| Austria, Cameroon | ||
| Khan R, et al. [ | Multi drug resistant (MDR) strains of | The MDR strains were sensitive to the antimicrobial activity of CZ. |
| India | ||
| Lima EO, et al. [ | CZ inhibited 80% of the dermatophyte strains tested and produced inhibition zones more than 10 mm in diameter | |
| Brazil | ||
| Maidment C, et al. [ | CZ demonstrated microbial inhibitory effect; alcoholic extracts had greater activity than aqueous extracts. Essential oils had greater activity than the spices. MICs were smaller with the oils than with the spices. | |
| UK | ||
| Mandal S, et al. [ | Methicillin resistant | CZ and |
| India | ||
| Mastura M, et al. [ | CZ was a moderate inhibitor of all the fungi tested (MIC values 1.26 – 2.51 μg/μl) | |
| Malaysia | ||
| Meades J, Jr et al. [ | CZ inhibited the carboxyl-transferase component of | |
| USA, UK, South Africa | ||
| Mishra AK, et al. [ | Of the 3 essential oils evaluated CZ oil showed the strongest inhibitory activity against all micro-organisms tested. | |
| India | ||
| Negi PS, et al. [ | All crude extracts of CZ fruits showed antibacterial activity. Ethyl acetate and benzene extracts showed higher activity than methanol and water extract. | |
| India, USA | ||
| Noudeh GD, et al. [ | CZ inhibited the growth of all tested Gram- positive and Gram-negative strains. | |
| Iran, UK | ||
| Rana IS, et al. [ | Of the 19 essential oils evaluated the highest antibacterial activity was depicted by CZ against all bacteria | |
| India | ||
| Senhaji O, et al. [ | In the presence of 0.05% of the oil, most of cells were killed after 30 min, suggesting a bactericidal action against | |
| Morocco | ||
| Shahverdi AR, et al. [ | The essential oil of CZ bark enhanced the bactericidal activity of clindamycin and decreased the MIC of clindamycin for | |
| Iran | ||
| Singh HB, et al. [ | Vapours of CZ bark oil and cinnamic aldehyde are effectively toxic at very low doses and at high inoculum density against the test fungi causing respiratory tract mycoses | |
| India | ||
| Sivakumar A, et al. [ | Water (MIC-100 μg/ml) and ethanolic (MIC-200 μg/ml) extracts of CZ was observed to have activity against | |
| India | ||
| Tekwu E, et al. [ | The MIC for H37Ra and H37Rv strains were 1024μg/ml and 512μg/ml respectively and MBC was >2048 μg/ml for both strains. | |
| Cameroon, Turkey | ||
| Unlu, M et al. [ | The essential oil of CZ showed strong antimicrobial activity against all microorganisms tested, | |
| Turkey |