BACKGROUND: An understanding of the context surrounding screen- and non-screen-based sedentary behavior would facilitate efforts to reduce children's overall sedentary behavior. This study examined the prevalence of specific types of sedentary behavior in children, the social and physical contexts surrounding these behaviors, and differences by gender. METHODS: Participants included 686 fifth graders participating in the Transitions and Activity Changes in Kids Study (TRACK). The Physical Activity Choices instrument measured child participation in seven sedentary behaviors, the social (i.e., with whom) and physical (i.e., where) contexts, and perceptions (i.e., why) of those behaviors. Analysis included mixed-model regression adjusted for race/ethnicity, BMI, and socioeconomic status. RESULTS: Children participated in both screen- and non-screen-based sedentary behaviors at very high frequencies. The most popular activities included watching television or videos, listening to music, playing video games (boys only), and talking on the phone or texting (girls only). Children engaged in sedentary behaviors most often at home, at school, or in their neighborhood. In general, the patterns of social context for the behaviors were similar for boys and girls, with the exception of video game playing. Girls perceived listening to music and talking on the phone or texting to be more fun than boys; children did not differ in their other perceptions (i.e., how much choice or how important) of the behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-level interventions that target reducing sedentary behavior in the home, neighborhood, and school context may be most effective; however, the approach needed will likely differ by gender.
BACKGROUND: An understanding of the context surrounding screen- and non-screen-based sedentary behavior would facilitate efforts to reduce children's overall sedentary behavior. This study examined the prevalence of specific types of sedentary behavior in children, the social and physical contexts surrounding these behaviors, and differences by gender. METHODS:Participants included 686 fifth graders participating in the Transitions and Activity Changes in Kids Study (TRACK). The Physical Activity Choices instrument measured child participation in seven sedentary behaviors, the social (i.e., with whom) and physical (i.e., where) contexts, and perceptions (i.e., why) of those behaviors. Analysis included mixed-model regression adjusted for race/ethnicity, BMI, and socioeconomic status. RESULTS:Children participated in both screen- and non-screen-based sedentary behaviors at very high frequencies. The most popular activities included watching television or videos, listening to music, playing video games (boys only), and talking on the phone or texting (girls only). Children engaged in sedentary behaviors most often at home, at school, or in their neighborhood. In general, the patterns of social context for the behaviors were similar for boys and girls, with the exception of video game playing. Girls perceived listening to music and talking on the phone or texting to be more fun than boys; children did not differ in their other perceptions (i.e., how much choice or how important) of the behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-level interventions that target reducing sedentary behavior in the home, neighborhood, and school context may be most effective; however, the approach needed will likely differ by gender.
Authors: Charles E Matthews; Kong Y Chen; Patty S Freedson; Maciej S Buchowski; Bettina M Beech; Russell R Pate; Richard P Troiano Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-02-25 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Charlotte Pratt; Larry S Webber; Chris D Baggett; Dianne Ward; Russell R Pate; David Murray; Timothy Lohman; Leslie Lytle; John P Elder Journal: Res Q Exerc Sport Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Luis B Sardinha; Lars Bo Andersen; Sigmund A Anderssen; Ana L Quitério; Rui Ornelas; Karsten Froberg; Chris J Riddoch; Ulf Ekelund Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-12-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Agnes G Bucko; Dwayne E Porter; Ruth Saunders; Lynn Shirley; Marsha Dowda; Russell R Pate Journal: Health Place Date: 2021-11-03 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Sharon E Taverno Ross; Morgan N Clennin; Marsha Dowda; Natalie Colabianchi; Russell R Pate Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-02-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Carina Nigg; Claudia Niessner; Claudio R Nigg; Doris Oriwol; Steffen C E Schmidt; Alexander Woll Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-09-21 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Jonathan Y Bernard; Falk Müller-Riemenschneider; Natarajan Padmapriya; Mya-Thway Tint; Suresh Anand Sadananthan; Navin Michael; Bozhi Chen; Shirong Cai; Jia Ying Toh; Carla Lanca; Kok Hian Tan; Seang Mei Saw; Lynette Pei-Chi Shek; Yap Seng Chong; Peter D Gluckman; Yung Seng Lee; Fabian Yap; Marielle V Fortier; Mary Foong-Fong Chong; Keith M Godfrey; Johan G Eriksson; S Sendhil Velan; Michael S Kramer Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2021-06-09 Impact factor: 5.095