Literature DB >> 24147640

Event-related potentials reveal the effect of prior knowledge on competition for representation and attentional capture.

Matthew R Hilimire1, Paul M Corballis.   

Abstract

Objects compete for representation in our limited capacity visual system. We examined how this competition is influenced by top-down knowledge using event-related potentials. Competition was manipulated by presenting visual search arrays in which the target or distractor was the only color singleton compared to displays in which both singletons were presented. Experiments 1 and 2 manipulated whether the observer knew the color of the target in advance. Experiment 3 ruled out low-level sensory explanations. Results show that, under conditions of competition, the distractor does not elicit an N2pc when the target color is known. However, the N2pc elicited by the target is reduced in the presence of a distractor. These findings suggest that top-down knowledge can prevent the capture of attention by distracting information, but this prior knowledge does not eliminate the competitive influence of the distractor on the target.
Copyright © 2013 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Keywords:  Attention; Contingent capture; EEG/ERP; N2pc; Pd; Ptc

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24147640     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  7 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Effects of eccentricity on the attention-related N2pc component of the event-related potential waveform.

Authors:  Orestis Papaioannou; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  The priority of goal-relevant information and evolutionarily threatening information in early attention processing:Evidence from behavioral and ERP study.

Authors:  Yuting Liu; Pei Wang; Guan Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Searching on the Back: Attentional Selectivity in the Periphery of the Tactile Field.

Authors:  Elena Gherri; Felicity White; Elisabetta Ambron
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-13

5.  Nogo Stimuli Do Not Receive More Attentional Suppression or Response Inhibition than Neutral Stimuli: Evidence from the N2pc, PD, and N2 Components in a Spatial Cueing Paradigm.

Authors:  Caroline Barras; Dirk Kerzel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-02

6.  Preserved Suppression of Salient Irrelevant Stimuli During Visual Search in Age-Associated Memory Impairment.

Authors:  Laura Lorenzo-López; Ana Maseda; Ana Buján; Carmen de Labra; Elena Amenedo; José C Millán-Calenti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-12

Review 7.  Inhibition in selective attention.

Authors:  Dirk van Moorselaar; Heleen A Slagter
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 5.691

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.