Literature DB >> 24146427

An experimental approach to the generation of human embryonic stem cells equivalents.

Katarzyna Skowron1, Marcin Tomsia, Piotr Czekaj.   

Abstract

Recently, particular attention has been paid to the human embryonic stem cells (hESC) in the context of their potential application in regenerative medicine; however, ethical concerns prevent their clinical application. Induction of pluripotency in somatic cells seems to be a good alternative for hESC recruitment regarding its potential use in tissue regeneration, disease modeling, and drug screening. Since Yamanaka's team in 2006 restored pluripotent state of somatic cells for the first time, a significant progress has been made in the area of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) generation. Here, we review the current state of knowledge in the issue of techniques applied to establish iPSC. Somatic cell nuclear transfer, cell fusion, cell extracts reprogramming, and techniques of direct reprogramming are described. Retroviral and lentiviral transduction are depicted as ways of cell reprogramming with the use of integrating vectors. Contrary to them, adenoviruses, plasmids, single multiprotein expression vectors, and PiggyBac transposition systems are examples of non-integrative vectors used in iPSC generation protocols. Furthermore, reprogramming with the delivery of specific proteins, miRNA or small chemical compounds are presented. Finally, the changes occurring during the reprogramming process are described. It is concluded that subject to some limitations iPSC could become equivalents for hESC in regenerative medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24146427     DOI: 10.1007/s12033-013-9702-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1073-6085            Impact factor:   2.695


  196 in total

1.  Preimplantation human embryos and embryonic stem cells show comparable expression of stage-specific embryonic antigens.

Authors:  J K Henderson; J S Draper; H S Baillie; S Fishel; J A Thomson; H Moore; P W Andrews
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.277

2.  Regional differences in expression of specific markers for human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Steen B Laursen; Kjeld Møllgård; Christian Olesen; Roberto S Oliveri; Christian B Brøchner; Anne Grete Byskov; Anders Nyboe Andersen; Poul Erik Høyer; Niels Tommerup; Claus Yding Andersen
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 3.  A challenge for regenerative medicine: proper genetic programming, not cellular mimicry.

Authors:  Angie Rizzino
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.780

4.  Gene expression profiling in multipotent DFAT cells derived from mature adipocytes.

Authors:  Hiromasa Ono; Yoshinao Oki; Hidemasa Bono; Koichiro Kano
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Embryonic germ cells induce epigenetic reprogramming of somatic nucleus in hybrid cells.

Authors:  M Tada; T Tada; L Lefebvre; S C Barton; M A Surani
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-11-03       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Suppression of induced pluripotent stem cell generation by the p53-p21 pathway.

Authors:  Hyenjong Hong; Kazutoshi Takahashi; Tomoko Ichisaka; Takashi Aoi; Osami Kanagawa; Masato Nakagawa; Keisuke Okita; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Induced pluripotent stem cells generated without viral integration.

Authors:  Matthias Stadtfeld; Masaki Nagaya; Jochen Utikal; Gordon Weir; Konrad Hochedlinger
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Applications of patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells; focused on disease modeling, drug screening and therapeutic potentials for liver disease.

Authors:  Yong Soon Chun; Pooja Chaudhari; Yoon-Young Jang
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 6.580

9.  Efficient human iPS cell derivation by a non-integrating plasmid from blood cells with unique epigenetic and gene expression signatures.

Authors:  Bin-Kuan Chou; Prashant Mali; Xiaosong Huang; Zhaohui Ye; Sarah N Dowey; Linda Ms Resar; Chunlin Zou; Y Alex Zhang; Jay Tong; Linzhao Cheng
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 10.  Embryonic stem cell markers.

Authors:  Wenxiu Zhao; Xiang Ji; Fangfang Zhang; Liang Li; Lan Ma
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 4.411

View more
  4 in total

1.  Developing Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Based Therapy for the Masses.

Authors:  Mahendra S Rao; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 2.  Integrated transcriptome analysis across mitochondrial disease etiologies and tissues improves understanding of common cellular adaptations to respiratory chain dysfunction.

Authors:  Zhe Zhang; Marni J Falk
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 5.085

3.  Simultaneous overexpression of miR-126 and miR-34a induces a superior antitumor efficacy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shu-De Feng; Ziming Mao; Chunying Liu; Yu-Song Nie; Bin Sun; Minggao Guo; Changqing Su
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  iPSC Therapy for Myocardial Infarction in Large Animal Models: Land of Hope and Dreams.

Authors:  Daina Martínez-Falguera; Oriol Iborra-Egea; Carolina Gálvez-Montón
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-12-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.