Literature DB >> 24146267

Idiopathic macular hole: analysis of visual outcomes and the use of indocyanine green or brilliant blue for internal limiting membrane peel.

Tom H Williamson1, Edward Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to analyze outcomes of idiopathic macular hole surgeries in relation to staging and the use of indocyanine green (ICG) or brilliant blue (BB) for internal limiting membrane (ILM) peel.
METHODS: Baseline, surgical, and outcome data for 351 consecutive primary macular hole surgeries was prospectively collected using electronic medical record software between 2001 and 2011. The outcomes for these cases were analysed in relation to staging and the use of ICG (0.5 mg/ml) or BB for ILM peel.
RESULTS: Mean age was 68.9 years (range 39-87) with 66.4 % females and 54.1 % right eyes. Follow-up duration was median 0.55 years. Vision was significantly improved from logMAR 0.97 (SD 0.45) (Snellen equivalent 20/185) preoperatively to 0.65 (SD 0.51) (20/90) at final follow-up. One hundred and eighteen patients had stage 2 macular holes, 185 stage 3, and 48 stage 4. Mean duration of symptoms varied with stage of hole: stage 2 0.53 years (SD 0.43), stage 3 0.79 years (SD 0.68), and stage 4 1.20 years (SD 1.26), p = 0.0002. Closure rates of the holes were significantly different, with stage 2 closing in 95.8 %, stage 3 in 73.0 %, and stage 4 in 56.3 %, p < 0.0001. At final follow-up, mean visual acuity (VA) was 0.42 (SD 0.33) (20/50) for stage 2, 0.75 (SD 0.53) (20/110) for stage 3, and 0.87 (SD 0.60) (20/145) for stage 4 holes, p < 0.0001. Postoperative VA was 0.71 (SD 0.53) (20/100) for patients in whom ICG was used, and 0.52 (SD 0.43) (20/70) for BB, p = 0.003. The proportion of patients who achieved a closed hole was less for ICG (73.2 %) than BB (89.9 %), p = 0.0005. For those patients with stage 2 hole who achieved hole closure, mean improvement in VA was significantly better for BB (0.47, SD 0.36) than for ICG (0.30, SD 0.31), p = 0.01.
CONCLUSIONS: Macular hole stage is a useful measure to help predict the chance of postoperative hole closure and visual outcome. The relationship between duration of symptoms and increasing stage suggests macula hole patients require prompt referral for consideration of early surgery. Better visual outcomes were achieved with BB for ILM peel than with ICG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24146267     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-013-2477-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  45 in total

1.  A multicentered clinical study of serum as adjuvant therapy for surgical treatment of macular holes. Vitrectomy for Macular Hole Study Group.

Authors:  A S Banker; W R Freeman; S P Azen; M Y Lai
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-11

2.  Surgery for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole: two-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing natural history, vitrectomy, and vitrectomy plus autologous serum: Morfields Macular Hole Study Group RAeport no. 1.

Authors:  Eric Ezra; Zdenek J Gregor
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-02

3.  Long-term visual outcomes in patients with successful macular hole surgery.

Authors:  R E Leonard; W E Smiddy; H W Flynn; W Feuer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Vitrectomy for the treatment of full-thickness stage 3 or 4 macular holes. Results of a multicentered randomized clinical trial. The Vitrectomy for Treatment of Macular Hole Study Group.

Authors:  W R Freeman; S P Azen; J W Kim; W el-Haig; D R Mishell; I Bailey
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-01

5.  Proper method for calculating average visual acuity.

Authors:  J T Holladay
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Long-term results following pars plana vitrectomy with platelet concentrate in pediatric patients with traumatic macular hole.

Authors:  Joachim Wachtlin; Claudia Jandeck; Simone Potthöfer; Ulrich Kellner; Michael H Foerster
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Predicting visual success in macular hole surgery.

Authors:  B Gupta; D A H Laidlaw; T H Williamson; S P Shah; R Wong; S Wren
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-07-26       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Pars plana vitrectomy for treatment of stage 2 macular holes.

Authors:  A J Ruby; D F Williams; M G Grand; M A Thomas; T A Meredith; I Boniuk; R J Olk
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-03

9.  An in vivo evaluation of Brilliant Blue G in animals and humans.

Authors:  M Remy; S Thaler; R G Schumann; C A May; M Fiedorowicz; F Schuettauf; M Grüterich; S G Priglinger; M M Nentwich; A Kampik; C Haritoglou
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Removal of sodium from the solvent reduces retinal pigment epithelium toxicity caused by indocyanine green: implications for macular hole surgery.

Authors:  J-D Ho; R J-F Tsai; S-N Chen; H-C Chen
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  15 in total

1.  Clinical and morphological comparisons of idiopathic macular holes between stage 3 and stage 4.

Authors:  Yanping Yu; Xida Liang; Zengyi Wang; Jing Wang; Wu Liu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Incomplete fluid-air exchange technique for idiopathic macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Bo-Jie Hu; Xue-Li Du; Wen-Bo Li; Yu-Wen Chang; Xing-Dong Shi; Teng Ma; Yong Wang; Yan-Hua He; Rui Niu; Wei-Na Cui
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Internal limiting membrane peeling with different dyes in the surgery of idiopathic macular hole: a systematic review of literature and network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shan-Shan Li; Ran You; Min Li; Xiao-Xiao Guo; Lu Zhao; Yan-Ling Wang; Xi Chen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 4.  Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular holes: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chufeng Gu; Qinghua Qiu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Vitrectomy in Highly Myopic Eyes with Macular Hole-Induced Retinal Detachment: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ling Ling; Yao Liu; Baixing Zhou; Feifei Gao; Zhe Hu; Man Tian; Yiqiao Xing; Kaibao Ji; Tao Sun; Wentian Zhou
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Duration of intraocular gases following vitreoretinal surgery.

Authors:  Andreas Kontos; James Tee; Alastair Stuart; Zaid Shalchi; Tom H Williamson
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Tailored internal limiting membrane flap technique for primary macular hole.

Authors:  Jia-Horung Hung; Yu-Harn Horng; Hui-Chen Chu; Meng-Syuan Li; Shwu-Jiuan Sheu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique in eyes with large idiopathic full-thickness macular hole: long-term functional and morphological outcomes.

Authors:  Nathalie Bleidißel; Julia Friedrich; Julian Klaas; Nikolaus Feucht; Chris Patrick Lohmann; Mathias Maier
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 9.  A Review of Surgical Outcomes and Advances for Macular Holes.

Authors:  Peng-Peng Zhao; Shuang Wang; Nan Liu; Zhi-Min Shu; Jin-Song Zhao
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Outcomes of Light Silicone Oil Tamponade for Failed Idiopathic Macular Hole Surgery.

Authors:  M Hossein Nowroozzadeh; Hossein Ashraf; Mehdi Zadmehr; Mohsen Farvardin
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.