Literature DB >> 24146003

Implementation of a multifaceted sepsis education program in an emerging country setting: clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness in a long-term follow-up study.

Danilo Teixeira Noritomi1, Otavio T Ranzani2,3, Mariana Barbosa Monteiro1, Elaine Maria Ferreira4, Sergio Ricardo Santos1, Fernando Leibel1, Flavia Ribeiro Machado4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether a multifaceted, centrally coordinated quality improvement program in a network of hospitals can increase compliance with the resuscitation bundle and improve clinical and economic outcomes in an emerging country setting.
METHODS: This was a pre- and post-intervention study in ten private hospitals (1,650 beds) in Brazil (from May 2010 to January 2012), enrolling 2,120 patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. The program used a multifaceted approach: screening strategies, multidisciplinary educational sessions, case management, and continuous performance assessment. The network administration and an external consultant provided performance feedback and benchmarking within the network. The primary outcome was compliance with the resuscitation bundle. The secondary outcomes were hospital mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay, quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain, and cost-effectiveness.
RESULTS: The proportion of patients who received all the required items for the resuscitation bundle improved from 13% [95% confidence interval (CI) 8-18%] at baseline to 62% (95% CI 54-69%) in the last trimester (p < 0.001). Hospital mortality decreased from 55% (95% CI 48-62%) to 26% (95% CI 19-32%, p < 0.001). Full compliance with the resuscitation bundle was associated with lower risk of hospital mortality (propensity weighted corrected risk ratio 0.74; 95% CI 0.56-0.94, p = 0.02). There was a reduction in the total cost per patient from 29.3 (95% CI 23.9-35.4) to 17.5 (95% CI 14.3-21.1) thousand US dollars from baseline to the last 3 months (mean difference -11,815; 95% CI -18,604 to -5,338). The mean QALY increased from 2.63 (95% CI 2.15-3.14) to 4.06 (95% CI 3.58-4.57). For each QALY, the full compliance saves US$5,383.
CONCLUSIONS: A multifaceted approach to severe sepsis and septic shock patients in an emerging country setting led to high compliance with the resuscitation bundle. The intervention was cost-effective and associated with a reduction in mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24146003     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-013-3131-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  40 in total

1.  Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care.

Authors:  D C Angus; W T Linde-Zwirble; J Lidicker; G Clermont; J Carcillo; M R Pinsky
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Cost-effectiveness of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign protocol for severe sepsis: a prospective nation-wide study in Spain.

Authors:  David Suarez; Ricard Ferrer; Antonio Artigas; Izaskun Azkarate; José Garnacho-Montero; Gemma Gomà; Mitchell M Levy; Juan Carlos Ruiz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Magnitude and duration of the effect of sepsis on survival. Department of Veterans Affairs Systemic Sepsis Cooperative Studies Group.

Authors:  A A Quartin; R M Schein; D H Kett; P N Peduzzi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-04-02       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Cost-effectiveness of an emergency department-based early sepsis resuscitation protocol.

Authors:  Alan E Jones; Jennifer L Troyer; Jeffrey A Kline
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Implementation of early goal-directed therapy for severe sepsis and septic shock: A decision analysis.

Authors:  David T Huang; Gilles Clermont; Tony T Dremsizov; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  A multicentre, prospective study to evaluate costs of septic patients in Brazilian intensive care units.

Authors:  Ana M C Sogayar; Flavia R Machado; Alvaro Rea-Neto; Amselmo Dornas; Cintia M C Grion; Suzana M A Lobo; Bernardo R Tura; Carla L O Silva; Ruy G R Cal; Idal Beer; Vilto Michels; Jorge Safi; Marcia Kayath; Eliezer Silva
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Economic implications of an evidence-based sepsis protocol: can we improve outcomes and lower costs?

Authors:  Andrew F Shorr; Scott T Micek; William L Jackson; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Management of severe sepsis in patients admitted to Asian intensive care units: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jason Phua; Younsuck Koh; Bin Du; Yao-Qing Tang; Jigeeshu V Divatia; Cheng Cheng Tan; Charles D Gomersall; Mohammad Omar Faruq; Babu Raja Shrestha; Nguyen Gia Binh; Yaseen M Arabi; Nawal Salahuddin; Bambang Wahyuprajitno; Mei-Lien Tu; Ahmad Yazid Haji Abd Wahab; Akmal A Hameed; Masaji Nishimura; Mark Procyshyn; Yiong Huak Chan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-06-13

Review 9.  The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis.

Authors:  Mitchell M Levy; R Phillip Dellinger; Sean R Townsend; Walter T Linde-Zwirble; John C Marshall; Julian Bion; Christa Schorr; Antonio Artigas; Graham Ramsay; Richard Beale; Margaret M Parker; Herwig Gerlach; Konrad Reinhart; Eliezer Silva; Maurene Harvey; Susan Regan; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Brazilian Sepsis Epidemiological Study (BASES study).

Authors:  Eliézer Silva; Marcelo de Almeida Pedro; Ana Cristina Beltrami Sogayar; Tatiana Mohovic; Carla Lika de Oliveira Silva; Mariano Janiszewski; Ruy Guilherme Rodrigues Cal; Erica Fernandes de Sousa; Thereza Phitoe Abe; Joel de Andrade; Jorge Dias de Matos; Ederlon Rezende; Murillo Assunção; Alvaro Avezum; Patrícia C S Rocha; Gustavo Faissol Janot de Matos; André Moreira Bento; Alice Danielli Corrêa; Paulo Cesar Bastos Vieira; Elias Knobel
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  45 in total

1.  SEPsis REcognition and MAnagement (SEPREMA survey).

Authors:  Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Aoife Quinn; Ron Daniels; Antonio Artigas; Brian Marsh; Yasser Sakr; Pedro Povoa; Jorge Salluh; Claude Martin; Marcus Schultz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Shooting for the bull's eye in septic shock.

Authors:  Kay Choong See; Tow Keang Lim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Effect of a multifaceted educational intervention for anti-infectious measures on sepsis mortality: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Frank Bloos; Hendrik Rüddel; Daniel Thomas-Rüddel; Daniel Schwarzkopf; Christine Pausch; Stephan Harbarth; Torsten Schreiber; Matthias Gründling; John Marshall; Philipp Simon; Mitchell M Levy; Manfred Weiss; Andreas Weyland; Herwig Gerlach; Tobias Schürholz; Christoph Engel; Claudia Matthäus-Krämer; Christian Scheer; Friedhelm Bach; Reimer Riessen; Bernhard Poidinger; Karin Dey; Norbert Weiler; Andreas Meier-Hellmann; Helene H Häberle; Gabriele Wöbker; Udo X Kaisers; Konrad Reinhart
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Understanding intensive care unit benchmarking.

Authors:  Jorge I F Salluh; Marcio Soares; Mark T Keegan
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Fixed minimum volume resuscitation: Pro.

Authors:  Flavia R Machado; Mitchell M Levy; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 6.  The intensive care medicine research agenda on septic shock.

Authors:  Anders Perner; Anthony C Gordon; Derek C Angus; Francois Lamontagne; Flavia Machado; James A Russell; Jean-Francois Timsit; John C Marshall; John Myburgh; Manu Shankar-Hari; Mervyn Singer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Epidemiology of severe infections in Latin American intensive care units.

Authors:  Guillermo Ortiz Ruiz; Carmelo Dueñas Castell
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2016-09

8.  Getting a consensus: advantages and disadvantages of Sepsis 3 in the context of middle-income settings.

Authors:  Flavia Ribeiro Machado; Murillo Santucci Cesar de Assunção; Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti; André Miguel Japiassú; Luciano Cesar Pontes de Azevedo; Mirella Cristine Oliveira
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

Review 9.  Early management of sepsis with emphasis on early goal directed therapy: AME evidence series 002.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Yucai Hong; Nathan J Smischney; Han-Pin Kuo; Panagiotis Tsirigotis; Jordi Rello; Win Sen Kuan; Christian Jung; Chiara Robba; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Marc Leone; Herbert Spapen; David Grimaldi; Sven Van Poucke; Steven Q Simpson; Patrick M Honore; Stefan Hofer; Pietro Caironi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Understanding and Enhancing Sepsis Survivorship. Priorities for Research and Practice.

Authors:  Hallie C Prescott; Theodore J Iwashyna; Bronagh Blackwood; Thierry Calandra; Linda L Chlan; Karen Choong; Bronwen Connolly; Paul Dark; Luigi Ferrucci; Simon Finfer; Timothy D Girard; Carol Hodgson; Ramona O Hopkins; Catherine L Hough; James C Jackson; Flavia R Machado; John C Marshall; Cheryl Misak; Dale M Needham; Pinaki Panigrahi; Konrad Reinhart; Sachin Yende; Ross Zafonte; Kathryn M Rowan; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 21.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.