Literature DB >> 24145899

Biomarker-based predictive models for prognosis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Xiaowei William Su1, Zachary Simmons2, Ryan Michael Mitchell3, Lan Kong4, Helen Elizabeth Stephens2, James Robert Connor1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Although median survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is 2 to 4 years, survival ranges from months to decades, creating prognostic uncertainty. Strategies to predict prognosis would benefit clinical management and outcomes assessments of clinical trials.
OBJECTIVE: To identify biomarkers in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with ALS that can predict prognosis. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, AND
SETTING: We conducted a retrospective study of plasma (n = 29) and CSF (n = 33) biomarkers identified in samples collected between March 16, 2005, and August 22, 2007, from patients with ALS at an academic tertiary care center. Participants included patients who were undergoing diagnostic evaluation in the neurology outpatient clinic and were eventually identified as having definite, probable, laboratory-supported probable, or possible ALS as defined by revised El-Escorial criteria. All were white and none had a family history of ALS. Clinical information extended from initial presentation to death. Genotyping for hemochromatosis (HFE) gene status was performed. Multiplex and immunoassay analysis of plasma and CSF was used to measure levels of 35 biomarkers. Statistical modeling was used to identify biomarker panels that could predict total disease duration. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Total disease duration, defined as the time from symptom onset to death, was the main outcome. The hypothesis being tested was formulated after data collection.
RESULTS: Multivariable models for total disease duration using biomarkers from plasma, CSF, and plasma and CSF combined incorporated 7, 6, and 6 biomarkers to achieve goodness-of-fit R2 values of 0.769, 0.617, and 0.962, respectively. After classification into prognostic categories, actual and predicted values achieved moderate to good agreement, with Cohen κ values of 0.526, 0.515, and 0.930 for plasma, CSF, and plasma and CSF combined models, respectively. Inflammatory biomarkers, including select interleukins, growth factors such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and l-ferritin, had predictive value. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study provides proof-of-concept for a novel multivariable modeling strategy to predict ALS prognosis. These results support unbiased biomarker discovery efforts in larger patient cohorts with detailed longitudinal follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24145899     DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.4646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Neurol        ISSN: 2168-6149            Impact factor:   18.302


  26 in total

Review 1.  Use of biomarkers in ALS drug development and clinical trials.

Authors:  Nadine Bakkar; Ashley Boehringer; Robert Bowser
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Stratification of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients: a crowdsourcing approach.

Authors:  Robert Kueffner; Neta Zach; Maya Bronfeld; Raquel Norel; Nazem Atassi; Venkat Balagurusamy; Barbara Di Camillo; Adriano Chio; Merit Cudkowicz; Donna Dillenberger; Javier Garcia-Garcia; Orla Hardiman; Bruce Hoff; Joshua Knight; Melanie L Leitner; Guang Li; Lara Mangravite; Thea Norman; Liuxia Wang; Jinfeng Xiao; Wen-Chieh Fang; Jian Peng; Chen Yang; Huan-Jui Chang; Gustavo Stolovitzky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Ophthalmic Manifestations of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).

Authors:  Nicholas J Volpe; Joseph Simonett; Amani A Fawzi; Teepu Siddique
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2015

4.  An exploratory study of serum creatinine levels in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Xueping Chen; Xiaoyan Guo; Rui Huang; Zhenzhen Zheng; Yongping Chen; Hui-Fang Shang
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 5.  Hereditary Motor Neuropathies and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: a Molecular and Clinical Update.

Authors:  Rocio Garcia-Santibanez; Matthew Burford; Robert C Bucelli
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 6.  Fluid-Based Biomarkers for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Lucas T Vu; Robert Bowser
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.620

7.  Outcome measures in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis clinical trials.

Authors:  Sabrina Paganoni; Merit Cudkowicz; James D Berry
Journal:  Clin Investig (Lond)       Date:  2014

8.  Combined Metabolomics and Transcriptomics Approaches to Assess the IL-6 Blockade as a Therapeutic of ALS: Deleterious Alteration of Lipid Metabolism.

Authors:  Franck Patin; Thomas Baranek; Patrick Vourc'h; Lydie Nadal-Desbarats; Jean-François Goossens; Sylviane Marouillat; Anne-Frédérique Dessein; Amandine Descat; Blandine Madji Hounoum; Clément Bruno; Hervé Watier; Mustafa Si-Tahar; Samuel Leman; Jean-Claude Lecron; Christian R Andres; Philippe Corcia; Hélène Blasco
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 9.  A Perspective on Roles Played by Innate and Adaptive Immunity in the Pathobiology of Neurodegenerative Disorders.

Authors:  Howard E Gendelman; R Lee Mosley
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Elevated Levels of IFN-γ in CSF and Serum of Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Juan Liu; Lina Gao; Dawei Zang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.