Literature DB >> 24144894

Utility of heel dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in diagnosing osteoporosis.

Sharon H Chou1, Jessica Hwang1, Siu-Ling Ma2, Tamara Vokes3.   

Abstract

Although peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements have been found to predict fractures in population studies of white subjects, little is known about their utility in other races and in patients with greater risk of fracture. In a cross-sectional study of 874 women referred for bone mineral density (BMD) testing, we examined the utility of heel BMD in African-American (AA) compared with Caucasian (CA) women and in women using glucocorticoids. The ability of heel T-score to predict central osteoporosis was similar in AA and CA women (odds ratio [OR] per 1 unit decrease in T-score of 2.79 [95% confidence interval {CI} 2.16-3.60] and 3.15 [95% CI 2.53-3.92], respectively). The association between heel T-score and prevalent vertebral fractures was also similar in the 2 groups (OR 1.46 [95% CI 1.15-1.85] in AA and 1.42 [95% CI 1.16-1.74] in CA). In women using glucocorticoids heel T-score was better than central T-score in predicting vertebral fractures (OR 1.38 [95% CI 1.03-1.85] and 1.22 [95% CI 0.86-1.73], respectively). We conclude that in a multiracial referral population heel BMD predicts central osteoporosis and prevalent vertebral fractures equally well in AA as in CA women and may be better than central BMD in assessing fragility in glucocorticoid users.
Copyright © 2014 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heel bone mineral density; osteoporosis; peripheral bone densitometry; racial differences

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24144894      PMCID: PMC3946648          DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2013.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  27 in total

1.  Prediction of fracture risk in postmenopausal white women with peripheral bone densitometry: evidence from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Paul D Miller; Ethel S Siris; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Kenneth G Faulkner; Lois E Wehren; Thomas A Abbott; Ya-Ting Chen; Marc L Berger; Arthur C Santora; Louis M Sherwood
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Central DXA utilization shifts from office-based to hospital-based settings among medicare beneficiaries in the wake of reimbursement changes.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Elizabeth Delzell; Hong Zhao; Andrew J Laster; Kenneth G Saag; Meredith L Kilgore; Michael A Morrisey; Nicole C Wright; Huifeng Yun; Jeffrey R Curtis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Clinical use of bone densitometry: scientific review.

Authors:  Steven R Cummings; David Bates; Dennis M Black
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-10-16       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Patterns of use of the bone mineral density test in Ontario, 1992-1998.

Authors:  S B Jaglal; W J McIsaac; G Hawker; L Jaakkimainen; S M Cadarette; B T Chan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-10-31       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Bone mineral density measurement and treatment for osteoporosis in older individuals with fractures: a gap in evidence-based practice guideline implementation.

Authors:  Adrianne Feldstein; Patricia J Elmer; Eric Orwoll; Michael Herson; Teresa Hillier
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-10-13

6.  Severity of prevalent vertebral fractures and the risk of subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures: results from the MORE trial.

Authors:  P D Delmas; H K Genant; G G Crans; J L Stock; M Wong; E Siris; J D Adachi
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Older women with fractures: patients falling through the cracks of guideline-recommended osteoporosis screening and treatment.

Authors:  Adrianne C Feldstein; Gregory A Nichols; Patricia J Elmer; David H Smith; Mikel Aickin; Michael Herson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 8.  Patterns of bone mineral density testing: current guidelines, testing rates, and interventions.

Authors:  Charles A Morris; Danielle Cabral; Hailu Cheng; Jeffrey N Katz; Joel S Finkelstein; Jerry Avorn; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  BMD at multiple sites and risk of fracture of multiple types: long-term results from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures.

Authors:  Katie L Stone; Dana G Seeley; Li-Yung Lui; Jane A Cauley; Kristine Ensrud; Warren S Browner; Michael C Nevitt; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 10.  Indications and reporting for dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  1 in total

1.  Deep learning approach for automatic segmentation of ulna and radius in dual-energy X-ray imaging.

Authors:  Fan Yang; Xin Weng; Yuehong Miao; Yuhui Wu; Hong Xie; Pinggui Lei
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-12-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.