Literature DB >> 24144233

Performance of ELISA and PCR methods for the determination of allergens in food: an evaluation of six years of proficiency testing for soy (Glycine max L.) and wheat gluten (Triticum aestivum L.).

Alexandra Scharf1, Udo Kasel, Gerhard Wichmann, Matthias Besler.   

Abstract

For the routine detection of allergens in foods, PCR and/or ELISA methods are employed. To assess the suitability of these methods, proficiency tests (PTs) could be used as a valuable instrument. It is a common practice to evaluate the results with respect to the experimentally obtained robust mean without considering the actual allergen content. In the present study, an overview is given of the results of allergen PTs for the determination of soy and gluten conducted by Dienstleistung Lebensmittel Analytik GbR (DLA). A total of 16 PTs were evaluated with respect to the comparison of PCR and ELISA performances and a new focus on the actually spiked values. The analytes were added in the ranges of 7.8-6264 mg/kg (gluten) and 184-5500 mg/kg (soy protein) in differently composed matrices such as pastry, infant food, and sausage meat. The evaluation of the PTs showed a widely reliable qualitative detection of both allergens by PCR methods. ELISA performances differed for soy and gluten. Although a high number of false-negative results occurred for the detection of soy, the qualitative detection of gluten was appropriate. Quantitative results showed obvious test kit-specific differences for the ELISA methods, but the limits of quantification were suitable for gluten determination. Both ELISA and PCR methods demonstrated their valuable contribution in food allergen determination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24144233     DOI: 10.1021/jf402619d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  6 in total

1.  The feasibility of harmonizing gluten ELISA measurements.

Authors:  Malgorzata Rzychon; Marcel Brohée; Fernando Cordeiro; Reka Haraszi; Franz Ulberth; Gavin O'Connor
Journal:  Food Chem       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 7.514

Review 2.  Gluten Detection Methods and Their Critical Role in Assuring Safe Diets for Celiac Patients.

Authors:  Claudia E Osorio; Jaime H Mejías; Sachin Rustgi
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  LAMP-LFD Based on Isothermal Amplification of Multicopy Gene ORF160b: Applicability for Highly Sensitive Low-Tech Screening of Allergenic Soybean (Glycine max) in Food.

Authors:  Stefanie M Allgöwer; Chris A Hartmann; Clarissa Lipinski; Vera Mahler; Stefanie Randow; Elke Völker; Thomas Holzhauser
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-11-26

4.  Rapid and accurate electrochemical sensor for food allergen detection in complex foods.

Authors:  Madanodaya Sundhoro; Srikanth R Agnihotra; Nazir D Khan; Abigail Barnes; Joseph BelBruno; Lukasz Mendecki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Development of triplex PCR for simultaneous detection of soybean and wheat.

Authors:  Jiyong Shin; Mi-Ju Kim; Hae-Yeong Kim
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 3.231

6.  The Development of Highly Specific and Sensitive Primers for the Detection of Potentially Allergenic Soybean (Glycine max) Using Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Combined with Lateral Flow Dipstick (LAMP-LFD).

Authors:  Stefanie M Allgöwer; Chris A Hartmann; Thomas Holzhauser
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-04-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.