PURPOSE: To compare (18)F-fluorocholine positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) for the detection of lymph node metastases in a large cohort of patients with high-risk prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with prostate-specific antigen levels between 20 and 99 ng/mL and/or Gleason score 8-10 cancers, planned for treatment with curative intent following a negative or inconclusive standard bone scan, were investigated with (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT followed by an ePLND. None of the patients received hormonal therapy prior to these staging procedures. Results for PET/CT were compared on a per-patient basis with histopathology from ePLND. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated. RESULTS: PET/CT detected a total of 76 suspected lymph node metastases and four suspected bone metastases in 33 (29 %) of the 112 included patients. Of these, 35 suspected lymph node metastases, only within the anatomical template area of an ePLND, were found in 21 of the patients. Histopathology of the ePLND specimens detected 117 lymph node metastases in 48 (43 %) of the 112 patients. Per-patient sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT for lymph node metastases within the ePLND template were 0.33, 0.92, 0.76 and 0.65, respectively. Only 11 patients had lymph nodes larger than 10 mm that would have been reported by CT alone. CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT detects lymph node metastases in a significant proportion of patients with high-risk prostate cancer with a high specificity, but low sensitivity.
PURPOSE: To compare (18)F-fluorocholine positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) for the detection of lymph node metastases in a large cohort of patients with high-risk prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients with prostate-specific antigen levels between 20 and 99 ng/mL and/or Gleason score 8-10 cancers, planned for treatment with curative intent following a negative or inconclusive standard bone scan, were investigated with (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT followed by an ePLND. None of the patients received hormonal therapy prior to these staging procedures. Results for PET/CT were compared on a per-patient basis with histopathology from ePLND. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated. RESULTS: PET/CT detected a total of 76 suspected lymph node metastases and four suspected bone metastases in 33 (29 %) of the 112 included patients. Of these, 35 suspected lymph node metastases, only within the anatomical template area of an ePLND, were found in 21 of the patients. Histopathology of the ePLND specimens detected 117 lymph node metastases in 48 (43 %) of the 112 patients. Per-patient sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT for lymph node metastases within the ePLND template were 0.33, 0.92, 0.76 and 0.65, respectively. Only 11 patients had lymph nodes larger than 10 mm that would have been reported by CT alone. CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT detects lymph node metastases in a significant proportion of patients with high-risk prostate cancer with a high specificity, but low sensitivity.
Authors: Orazio Schillaci; Ferdinando Calabria; Mario Tavolozza; Carmelo Cicciò; Marco Carlani; Cristiana R Caracciolo; Roberta Danieli; Antonio Orlacchio; Giovanni Simonetti Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: Axel Heidenreich; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Nicolas Mottet; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filliberto Zattoni Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Hanneke J M Meijer; Emile N van Lin; Oscar A Debats; J Alfred Witjes; Paul N Span; Johannes H A M Kaanders; Jelle O Barentsz Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-06-02 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Pasquale Martino; Vincenzo Scattoni; Andrea B Galosi; Paolo Consonni; Carlo Trombetta; Silvano Palazzo; Carmen Maccagnano; Giovanni Liguori; Massimo Valentino; Michele Battaglia; Libero Barozzi Journal: World J Urol Date: 2011-05-08 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Axel Häcker; Stefan Jeschke; Karl Leeb; Kurt Prammer; Josef Ziegerhofer; Wolfgang Sega; Werner Langsteger; Guenter Janetschek Journal: J Urol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Henrik Kjölhede; Göran Ahlgren; Helen Almquist; Fredrik Liedberg; Kerstin Lyttkens; Thomas Ohlsson; Ola Bratt Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Andrei Fodor; Andrea Lancia; Francesco Ceci; Maria Picchio; Morten Hoyer; Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa; Piet Ost; Paolo Castellucci; Elena Incerti; Nadia Di Muzio; Gianluca Ingrosso Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-05-11 Impact factor: 4.226