Literature DB >> 24140351

Presence and transport of the antimicrobials triclocarban and triclosan in a wastewater-dominated stream and freshwater environment.

Pradeep Gautam1, James S Carsella, Chad A Kinney.   

Abstract

The presence of the antimicrobials triclocarban (TCC) and triclosan (TCS)in Fountain Creek, a wastewater-dominated stream, and the Arkansas River, Colorado, USA was measured in the surface water, suspended sediments, and bed sediments during spring runoff (high flow) and summer base flow (low flow) conditions. Fountain Creak is a tributary of the Arkansas River. Passive polar organic chemical integrative samplers (POCIS) were used along with active sampling (water grab samples) to measure and TCS concentrations in these surface waters. The concentration of TCC and TCS, based on POCIS measurements, ranged from 4.5 to 47.3 ng/L and 3.9 to 28.3 ng/L, respectively, at the five sample sites monitored in this study under both flow conditions. The range of concentrations of TCC and TCS in suspended sediments was 0.7-57.3 ng/g and 0.7-13.3 ng/g, respectively, and was closely tied to the quantity of organic carbon in the suspended sediment, which ranged from 1.6 to 14.5%. The quantity of organic carbon in suspended sediment during the summer base flow was influenced by runoff from the burn area of a large forest fire that occurred between the two sampling periods. The primary transport mechanism of TCC and TCS in these surface waters was in the dissolved phase, with 64-99% of TCC and 68-99% of TCS transported in the dissolved phase. The total amount of TCS and TCC in bed-sediments was relatively low, with the maximum amount at any one site being 0.38 ± 0.15 ng/g TCS and 4.09 ± 5.26 ng/g TCC. Fountain Creek contributed up to 76% and 69% of the TCC and TCS, respectively, that is transported directly below its confluence with Arkansas River. Fountain Creek drained approximately 3.0 g/day TCS (in spring), 2.9 g/day TCS (in summer) and 1.9 g/day TCC (in spring), 2.0 g/day TCC (in-summer) into the Arkansas River, which suggests consistent input of TCC and TCS into Fountain Creek, such as in discharge of treated wastewater that is independent of changing creek flow conditions.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active sampling; POCIS; Passive sampling; Suspended sediments; Triclocarban; Triclosan

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24140351     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  4 in total

1.  Applying analytical decision methods for determination of the best treatment alternative to remove emerging micropollutants from drinking water and wastewater: triclosan example.

Authors:  Emrah Ozturk
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Chinese population exposure to triclosan and triclocarban as measured via human urine and nails.

Authors:  Jie Yin; Ling Wei; Ying Shi; Jing Zhang; Qingqing Wu; Bing Shao
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Occurrence, distribution, and multi-phase partitioning of triclocarban and triclosan in an urban river receiving wastewater treatment plants effluent in China.

Authors:  Xi-Kui Wang; Xia-Jie Jiang; Yi-Nan Wang; Jing Sun; Chen Wang; Ting-Ting Shen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Human fetal exposure to triclosan and triclocarban in an urban population from Brooklyn, New York.

Authors:  Benny F G Pycke; Laura A Geer; Mudar Dalloul; Ovadia Abulafia; Alizee M Jenck; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 9.028

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.