Jody L Sindelar1, Stephanie S O'Malley2. 1. Yale School of Public Health, Yale School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208034, New Haven, CT 06520-8034, USA. Electronic address: jody.sindelar@yale.edu. 2. Yale Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, 34 Park Street, New Haven, CT 06519-1187, USA. Electronic address: stephanie.omalley@yale.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Smoking is the most preventable cause of death, thus justifying efforts to effectively motivate quitting. We compared the effectiveness of financial versus health messages to motivate smoking cessation. Low-income individuals disproportionately smoke and, given their greater income constraints, we hypothesized that making financial costs of smoking more salient would encourage more smokers to try quitting. Further, we predicted that financial messages would be stronger in financial settings where pecuniary constraints are most salient. METHODS: We conducted a field study in low-income areas of New Haven, Connecticut using brochures with separate health vs. financial messages to motivate smoking cessation. Displays were rotated among community settings-check-cashing, health clinics, and grocery stores. We randomized brochure displays with gain-framed cessation messages across locations. RESULTS: Our predictions were confirmed. Financial messages attracted significantly more attention than health messages, especially in financial settings. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that greater emphasis on the financial gains to quitting and use of financial settings to provide cessation messages may be more effective in motivating quitting. Importantly, use of financial settings could open new, non-medical venues for encouraging cessation. Encouraging quitting could improve health, enhance spending power of low-income smokers, and reduce health disparities in both health and purchasing power.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Smoking is the most preventable cause of death, thus justifying efforts to effectively motivate quitting. We compared the effectiveness of financial versus health messages to motivate smoking cessation. Low-income individuals disproportionately smoke and, given their greater income constraints, we hypothesized that making financial costs of smoking more salient would encourage more smokers to try quitting. Further, we predicted that financial messages would be stronger in financial settings where pecuniary constraints are most salient. METHODS: We conducted a field study in low-income areas of New Haven, Connecticut using brochures with separate health vs. financial messages to motivate smoking cessation. Displays were rotated among community settings-check-cashing, health clinics, and grocery stores. We randomized brochure displays with gain-framed cessation messages across locations. RESULTS: Our predictions were confirmed. Financial messages attracted significantly more attention than health messages, especially in financial settings. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that greater emphasis on the financial gains to quitting and use of financial settings to provide cessation messages may be more effective in motivating quitting. Importantly, use of financial settings could open new, non-medical venues for encouraging cessation. Encouraging quitting could improve health, enhance spending power of low-income smokers, and reduce health disparities in both health and purchasing power.
Authors: Richard O'Connor; Brian Fix; Paula Celestino; Shannon Carlin-Menter; Andrew Hyland; K Michael Cummings Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2006 Jan-Feb
Authors: Kevin G Volpp; Andrea Gurmankin Levy; David A Asch; Jesse A Berlin; John J Murphy; Angela Gomez; Harold Sox; Jingsan Zhu; Caryn Lerman Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Brian P Jenssen; Mary Kate Kelly; Jennifer Faerber; Chloe Hannan; David A Asch; Justine Shults; Robert A Schnoll; Alexander G Fiks Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2020-06-22 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Erin S Rogers; Marc I Rosen; Brian Elbel; Binhuan Wang; Kelly Kyanko; Elizabeth Vargas; Christina N Wysota; Scott E Sherman Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Darla E Kendzor; Michael S Businelle; Joseph J C Waring; Ashley J Mathews; Daryl W Geller; Jocelyn M Barton; Adam C Alexander; Emily T Hébert; Chaelin K Ra; Damon J Vidrine Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 4.773