Stacey C Sigmon1, Mollie E Patrick. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, University Health Center Campus, 1 S. Prospect St, Burlington, VT 05401, USA. stacey.sigmon@uvm.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable death in the United States and world. Despite the availability of numerous therapies for smoking cessation, additional efficacious interventions are greatly needed. We provide a narrative review of published studies evaluating financial incentives for smoking cessation and discuss the parameters important for ensuring the efficacy of incentive interventions for smoking cessation. METHODS: Published studies that evaluated the impact of incentives to promote smoking cessation and included an appropriate control or comparison condition were identified and reviewed. RESULTS: Incentives are efficacious for promoting smoking abstinence across the general population of smokers as well as substance abusers, adolescents, patients with pulmonary disease, patients with serious mental illness and other challenging subgroups. To develop and implement an effective incentive treatment for smoking, special attention should be paid to biochemical verification of smoking status, incentive magnitude and the schedule of incentive delivery. CONCLUSION: Consistent with the extensive literature showing that incentives are effective in reducing illicit drug use, a large body of evidence supports their effectiveness in reducing smoking. Continued efforts are warranted to further develop and disseminate incentive-based treatments for smoking cessation across clinical settings and populations.
OBJECTIVE: Cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable death in the United States and world. Despite the availability of numerous therapies for smoking cessation, additional efficacious interventions are greatly needed. We provide a narrative review of published studies evaluating financial incentives for smoking cessation and discuss the parameters important for ensuring the efficacy of incentive interventions for smoking cessation. METHODS: Published studies that evaluated the impact of incentives to promote smoking cessation and included an appropriate control or comparison condition were identified and reviewed. RESULTS: Incentives are efficacious for promoting smoking abstinence across the general population of smokers as well as substance abusers, adolescents, patients with pulmonary disease, patients with serious mental illness and other challenging subgroups. To develop and implement an effective incentive treatment for smoking, special attention should be paid to biochemical verification of smoking status, incentive magnitude and the schedule of incentive delivery. CONCLUSION: Consistent with the extensive literature showing that incentives are effective in reducing illicit drug use, a large body of evidence supports their effectiveness in reducing smoking. Continued efforts are warranted to further develop and disseminate incentive-based treatments for smoking cessation across clinical settings and populations.
Authors: J R Hughes; S B Gulliver; J W Fenwick; W A Valliere; K Cruser; S Pepper; P Shea; L J Solomon; B S Flynn Journal: Health Psychol Date: 1992 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Kevin M Gray; Matthew J Carpenter; Nathaniel L Baker; Karen J Hartwell; A Lee Lewis; D Walter Hiott; Deborah Deas; Himanshu P Upadhyaya Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2010-10-08
Authors: Jin H Yoon; Stephen T Higgins; Matthew P Bradstreet; Gary J Badger; Colleen S Thomas Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2009-04-24 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Darla E Kendzor; Michael S Businelle; Insiya B Poonawalla; Erica L Cuate; Anshula Kesh; Debra M Rios; Ping Ma; David S Balis Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: James Mackillop; Cara M Murphy; Rosemarie A Martin; Monika Stojek; Jennifer W Tidey; Suzanne M Colby; Damaris J Rohsenow Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-10-24 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Marlon P Mundt; Timothy B Baker; David L Fraser; Stevens S Smith; Megan E Piper; Michael C Fiore Journal: Value Health Date: 2018-09-20 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Dana A Cavallo; Judith L Cooney; Ty S Schepis; Grace Kong; Thomas B Liss; Amanda K Liss; Thomas J McMahon; Charla Nich; Theresa Babuscio; Bruce J Rounsaville; Kathleen M Carroll Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 4.492