Literature DB >> 24139271

Comparison of the mechanical behavior between controlled memory and superelastic nickel-titanium files via finite element analysis.

Leandro de Arruda Santos1, Maria Guiomar de Azevedo Bahia, Estevam Barbosa de Las Casas, Vicente Tadeu Lopes Buono.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the flexibility and torsional stiffness of a controlled memory (CM) nickel-titanium (NiTi) file and compare its mechanical responses with those of a superelastic NiTi file with the same geometry using finite element simulation.
METHODS: A commercially available instrument with a tip size of 30 and a 0.06 taper was selected for this study. The geometric model for finite element analysis was generated by micro-computed tomographic scanning, and the data for the constitutive model of controlled memory NiTi were obtained from the literature. The numeric analysis was performed in ABAQUS (SIMULIA, Providence, RI) with boundary conditions that were based on the ISO 3630-1 specification.
RESULTS: The CM NiTi file exhibited the least bending moment and maximum stress value (523 MPa) under 45° bending simulation. However, the least torsional stiffness was calculated for this same instrument.
CONCLUSIONS: The higher flexibility and potential fatigue resistance of the CM NiTi files were confirmed, indicating that this new technology represents an improvement in the mechanical behavior of the rotary NiTi files.
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Controlled memory NiTi files; NiTi rotary files; finite element analysis; mechanical behavior; superelastic NiTi files

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24139271     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.07.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  14 in total

1.  [Construction and mechanical analysis of finite element model for bending property of controlled memory wire nickel-titanium rotary file].

Authors:  H Y Fu; F F Wang; X M Hou
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-02-18

2.  Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of One Curve, F6 Skytaper, Protaper Next, and Hyflex CM endodontic files.

Authors:  Charlotte Gouédard; Laurent Pino; Reza Arbab-Chirani; Shabnam Arbab-Chirani; Valérie Chevalier
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2022-03-04

3.  Evaluation of apical root defects during canal instrumentation with two different nickel-titanium (NiTi) systems by optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Wenxin Zhang; Yuhong Liang
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 3.719

4.  Comparison and evaluation of surface deformation of Hyflex controlled memory and Hyflex electric discharge machining nickel titanium rotary files and cyclic fatigue resistance after instrumentation and heat sterilization - An in vitro study.

Authors:  Paramarshi Das; D V Swapna; Roopa R Nadig
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2020-08-04

5.  Topographic Analysis of HyFlex(®) Controlled Memory Nickel-Titanium Files.

Authors:  Dina Al-Sudani
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

6.  Cyclic fatigue, bending resistance, and surface roughness of ProTaper Gold and EdgeEvolve files in canals with single- and double-curvature.

Authors:  Wafaa A Khalil; Zuhair S Natto
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2019-04-26

7.  Influence of the Pecking Motion Frequency on the Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Endodontic Rotary Files.

Authors:  Álvaro Zubizarreta-Macho; Jesús Mena Álvarez; Alberto Albaladejo Martínez; Juan José Segura-Egea; Javier Caviedes Brucheli; Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Roberto López Píriz; Óscar Alonso-Ezpeleta
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Effects of R-Phase on Mechanical Responses of a Nickel-Titanium Endodontic Instrument: Structural Characterization and Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Leandro de Arruda Santos; Pedro Damas Resende; Maria Guiomar de Azevedo Bahia; Vicente Tadeu Lopes Buono
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2016-05-22

9.  Torsional and Bending Properties of V Taper 2H, ProTaper NEXT, NRT, and One Shape.

Authors:  Soram Oh; Kee-Yeon Kum; Kwon Cho; Soo-Hyuk Lee; Seung-Hyun You; Jonggun Go; Bong-Ki Jeon; Sang-Woo Kim; Tae-Hwan Kim; Ji-Hyun Jang; Hiran Perinpanayagam; Jin-Woo Kim; Seok Woo Chang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  In vitro comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of TruNatomy in single and double curvature canals compared with different nickel-titanium rotary instruments.

Authors:  Amr M Elnaghy; Shaymaa E Elsaka; Ayman O Mandorah
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.