Literature DB >> 24138483

OH radicals from the indirect actions of X-rays induce cell lethality and mediate the majority of the oxygen enhancement effect.

Ryoichi Hirayama1, Atsushi Ito, Miho Noguchi, Yoshitaka Matsumoto, Akiko Uzawa, Gen Kobashi, Ryuichi Okayasu, Yoshiya Furusawa.   

Abstract

We examined OH radical-mediated indirect actions from X irradiation on cell killing in wild-type Chinese hamster ovary cell lines (CHO and AA8) under oxic and hypoxic conditions, and compared the contribution of direct and indirect actions under both conditions. The contribution of indirect action on cell killing can be estimated from the maximum degree of protection by dimethylsulfoxide, which suppresses indirect action by quenching OH radicals without affecting the direct action of X rays on cell killing. The contributions of indirect action on cell killing of CHO cells were 76% and 50% under oxic and hypoxic conditions, respectively, and those for AA8 cells were 85% and 47%, respectively. Therefore, the indirect action on cell killing was enhanced by oxygen during X irradiation in both cell lines tested. Oxygen enhancement ratios (OERs) at the 10% survival level (D10 or LD90) for CHO and AA8 cells were 2.68 ± 0.15 and 2.76 ± 0.08, respectively. OERs were evaluated separately for indirect and direct actions, which gave the values of 3.75 and 2.01 for CHO, and 4.11 and 1.32 for AA8 cells, respectively. Thus the generally accepted OER value of ∼3 is best understood as the average of the OER values for both indirect and direct actions. These results imply that both indirect and direct actions on cell killing require oxygen for the majority of lethal DNA damage, however, oxygen plays a larger role in indirect than for direct effects. Conversely, the lethal damage induced by the direct action of X rays are less affected by oxygen concentration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24138483     DOI: 10.1667/RR13368.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  10 in total

1.  Sensitisation of cancer cells to radiotherapy by serine and glycine starvation.

Authors:  Mattia Falcone; Alejandro Huerta Uribe; Vasileios Papalazarou; Alice C Newman; Dimitris Athineos; Katrina Stevenson; Charles-Etienne Gabriel Sauvé; Yajing Gao; Jin K Kim; Michael Del Latto; Maria Kierstead; Chao Wu; J Joshua Smith; Paul B Romesser; Anthony J Chalmers; Karen Blyth; Oliver D K Maddocks
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 9.075

2.  Catalytic activity imperative for nanoparticle dose enhancement in photon and proton therapy.

Authors:  Lukas R H Gerken; Alexander Gogos; Fabian H L Starsich; Helena David; Maren E Gerdes; Hans Schiefer; Serena Psoroulas; David Meer; Ludwig Plasswilm; Damien C Weber; Inge K Herrmann
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 17.694

3.  Radiation Promptly Alters Cancer Live Cell Metabolic Fluxes: An In Vitro Demonstration.

Authors:  David Campos; Wenny Peeters; Kwangok Nickel; Brian Burkel; Johan Bussink; Randall J Kimple; Albert van der Kogel; Kevin W Eliceiri; Michael W Kissick
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Effects of indirect actions and oxygen on relative biological effectiveness: estimate of DSB induction and conversion induced by gamma rays and helium ions.

Authors:  Ju-Ying Tsai; Fang-Hsin Chen; Tsung-Yu Hsieh; Ya-Yun Hsiao
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Modeling Direct and Indirect Action on Cell Survival After Photon Irradiation under Normoxia and Hypoxia.

Authors:  Hans Liew; Stewart Mein; Jürgen Debus; Ivana Dokic; Andrea Mairani
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Impact of Target Oxygenation on the Chemical Track Evolution of Ion and Electron Radiation.

Authors:  Daria Boscolo; Michael Krämer; Martina C Fuss; Marco Durante; Emanuele Scifoni
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Kill-painting of hypoxic tumours in charged particle therapy.

Authors:  Walter Tinganelli; Marco Durante; Ryoichi Hirayama; Michael Krämer; Andreas Maier; Wilma Kraft-Weyrather; Yoshiya Furusawa; Thomas Friedrich; Emanuele Scifoni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  5,6-Dihydropyrimidine peroxyl radical reactivity in DNA.

Authors:  Joanna Maria N San Pedro; Marc M Greenberg
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Localized hydroxyl radical generation at mmol/L and mol/L levels in water by photon irradiation.

Authors:  Yukihiro Ogawa; Emiko Sekine-Suzuki; Megumi Ueno; Ikuo Nakanishi; Ken-Ichiro Matsumoto
Journal:  J Clin Biochem Nutr       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.114

Review 10.  Difference in Acquired Radioresistance Induction Between Repeated Photon and Particle Irradiation.

Authors:  Katsutoshi Sato; Takashi Shimokawa; Takashi Imai
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.