| Literature DB >> 24138438 |
Jody D Ciolino1, Renée H Martin, Wenle Zhao, Edward C Jauch, Michael D Hill, Yuko Y Palesch.
Abstract
In logistic regression analysis for binary clinical trial data, adjusted treatment effect estimates are often not equivalent to unadjusted estimates in the presence of influential covariates. This article uses simulation to quantify the benefit of covariate adjustment in logistic regression. However, International Conference on Harmonization guidelines suggest that covariate adjustment be prespecified. Unplanned adjusted analyses should be considered secondary. Results suggest that if adjustment is not possible or unplanned in a logistic setting, balance in continuous covariates can alleviate some (but never all) of the shortcomings of unadjusted analyses. The case of log binomial regression is also explored.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24138438 PMCID: PMC4279871 DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2013.834912
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biopharm Stat ISSN: 1054-3406 Impact factor: 1.051