Literature DB >> 2727470

Covariate imbalance and random allocation in clinical trials.

S J Senn1.   

Abstract

A model is developed to estimate the effect of covariate imbalance on the size of a test of treatment efficacy in randomized clinical trials comparing two treatments when dispersion parameters are known. It is concluded that tests of homogeneity on the covariates should not be performed, that covariate imbalance is just as much a problem for large studies as for small ones in terms of effect on size, and that the effect of correlation between covariates and measures of efficacy is more complex than has previously been suggested. The best way to adjust for covariate imbalance is by an analysis of covariance.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2727470     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780080410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  64 in total

1.  Understanding controlled trials: baseline imbalance in randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  C Roberts; D J Torgerson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-17

2.  The ability of familiarity, disruption, and the relative strength of nonenvironmental context cues to explain unreliable environmental-context-dependent memory effects in free recall.

Authors:  A Rutherford
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-12

3.  Chronic fatigue in general practice: is counselling as good as cognitive behaviour therapy? A UK randomised trial.

Authors:  L Ridsdale; E Godfrey; T Chalder; P Seed; M King; P Wallace; S Wessely
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of repeated cross-sectional cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 0.968

5.  Choice of statistical model for cost-effectiveness analysis and covariate adjustment: empirical application of prominent models and assessment of their results.

Authors:  Theodoros Mantopoulos; Paul M Mitchell; Nicky J Welton; Richard McManus; Lazaros Andronis
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-10-07

6.  Minimal sufficient balance-a new strategy to balance baseline covariates and preserve randomness of treatment allocation.

Authors:  Wenle Zhao; Michael D Hill; Yuko Palesch
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 7.  Reporting attrition in randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Jo C Dumville; David J Torgerson; Catherine E Hewitt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-04-22

8.  The impact of covariate adjustment at randomization and analysis for binary outcomes: understanding differences between superiority and noninferiority trials.

Authors:  Katherine Nicholas; Sharon D Yeatts; Wenle Zhao; Jody Ciolino; Keith Borg; Valerie Durkalski
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  A model-based conditional power assessment for decision making in randomized controlled trial studies.

Authors:  Baiming Zou; Jianwen Cai; Gary G Koch; Haibo Zhou; Fei Zou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Using audit information to adjust parameter estimates for data errors in clinical trials.

Authors:  Bryan E Shepherd; Pamela A Shaw; Lori E Dodd
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.