Literature DB >> 24138063

Minimally invasive removal of thoracic and lumbar spinal tumors using a nonexpandable tubular retractor.

Andre Nzokou1, Alexander G Weil, Daniel Shedid.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Resection of spinal tumors traditionally requires bilateral subperiosteal muscle stripping, extensive laminectomy, and, in cases of foraminal extension, partial or radical facetectomy. Fusion is often warranted in cases of facetectomy to prevent deformity, pain, and neurological deterioration. Recent reports have demonstrated safety and efficacy of mini-open removal of these tumors using expandable tubular retractors. The authors report their experience with the minimally invasive removal of extradural foraminal and intradural-extramedullary tumors using the nonexpandable tubular retractor.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive resection of spinal tumors at Notre Dame Hospital was performed.
RESULTS: Between December 2005 and March 2012, 13 patients underwent minimally invasive removal of spinal tumors at Notre Dame Hospital, Montreal. There were 6 men and 7 women with a mean age of 55 years (range 20-80 years). There were 2 lumbar and 2 thoracic intradural-extramedullary tumors and 7 thoracic and 2 lumbar extradural foraminal tumors. Gross-total resection was achieved in 12 patients. Subtotal resection (90%) was attained in 1 patient because the tumor capsule was adherent to the diaphragm. The average duration of surgery was 189 minutes (range 75-540 minutes), and the average blood loss was 219 ml (range 25-500 ml). There were no major procedure-related complications. Pathological analysis revealed benign schwannoma in 8 patients and meningioma, metastasis, plasmacytoma, osteoid osteoma, and hemangiopericytoma in 1 patient each. The average equivalent dose of postoperative narcotics after surgery was 66.3 mg of morphine. The average length of hospitalization was 66 hours (range 24-144 hours). All working patients returned to normal activities within 4 weeks. The average MRI and clinical follow-up were 13 and 21 months, respectively (range 2-68 months). At last follow-up, 92% of patients had improvement or resolution of pain with a visual analog scale score that improved from 7.8 to 1.2. All patients with neurological impairment improved. The American Spinal Injury Association grade improved in all but 1 patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Intradural-extramedullary and extradural tumors can be completely and safely resected through a minimally invasive approach using the nonexpandable tubular retractor. This approach may be associated with even less tissue destruction than mini-open techniques, translating into a quicker functional recovery. In cases of foraminal tumors, by eliminating the need for facetectomy, this minimally invasive approach may decrease the incidence of postoperative deformity and eliminate the need for adjunctive fusion surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24138063     DOI: 10.3171/2013.9.SPINE121061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  12 in total

1.  Surgical management of solitary nerve sheath tumors originating around the epiconus or conus medullaris: a retrospective case analysis based on neurological function.

Authors:  Kentaro Naito; Toru Yamagata; Atsufumi Nagahama; Shinichi Kawahara; Kenji Ohata; Toshihiro Takami
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Minimally Invasive Tubular Retractor Surgery for Intradural Extramedullary Spinal Tumor Reduces Postoperative Degeneration of Paraspinal Muscle.

Authors:  Zhexi He; Cho Ying Li; Calvin Hoi-Kwan Mak; Tat Shing Tse; Fung Ching Cheung
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2022-07-06

Review 3.  Minimally invasive resection of extradural dumbbell tumors of thoracic spine: surgical techniques and literature review.

Authors:  Chunbo Li; Yun Ye; Yutong Gu; Jian Dong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Minimally invasive resection of an extradural far lateral lumbar schwannoma with zygapophyseal joint sparing: surgical nuances and literature review.

Authors:  Vítor M Gonçalves; Bruno Santiago; Vítor C Ferreira; Manuel Cunha E Sá
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2014-09-18

5.  Minimally invasive repair of a pseudomeningocele caused by a sheared intrathecal catheter following implantation of a drug delivery system.

Authors:  S Raju; P O Champagne; L Walsh; Daniel J Denis
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-12-06

6.  Analysis of the Surgical Technique and Outcome of the Thoracic and Lumbar Intradural Spinal Tumor Excision Using Minimally Invasive Tubular Retractor System.

Authors:  Binoy Damodar Thavara; Geo Senil Kidangan; Bijukrishnan Rajagopalawarrier
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

7.  Comparison of Minimally Invasive Tubular Surgery with Conventional Surgery in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Metastasis.

Authors:  Yunpeng Cui; Xuedong Shi; Chuan Mi; Bing Wang; Yuanxing Pan; Yunfei Lin
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  Minimally Invasive Removal of Extra- and Intradural Spinal Tumors Using Full Endoscopic Visualization.

Authors:  Joel Caballero-García; Yurledys Jhohana Linares-Benavides; Ueza Laurinelis Salazar Leitão; Carlos Aparicio-García; Misael López-Sánchez
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-08-30

9.  Comparison of Neuroendoscopic and Microscopic Surgery for Unilateral Hemilaminectomy: Experience of a Single Institution.

Authors:  Wei Zeng; Haixiao Jiang; Shiwei He; Yukun Zhang; Bo Yu; Hui Wang; Cunzu Wang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-29

Review 10.  When Less Is More: The indications for MIS Techniques and Separation Surgery in Metastatic Spine Disease.

Authors:  Scott L Zuckerman; Ilya Laufer; Arjun Sahgal; Yoshiya J Yamada; Meic H Schmidt; Dean Chou; John H Shin; Naresh Kumar; Daniel M Sciubba
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 3.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.