Literature DB >> 24137017

Auditory distortions: origins and functions.

Paul Avan, Béla Büki, Christine Petit.   

Abstract

To enhance weak sounds while compressing the dynamic intensity range, auditory sensory cells amplify sound-induced vibrations in a nonlinear, intensity-dependent manner. In the course of this process, instantaneous waveform distortion is produced, with two conspicuous kinds of interwoven consequences, the introduction of new sound frequencies absent from the original stimuli, which are audible and detectable in the ear canal as otoacoustic emissions, and the possibility for an interfering sound to suppress the response to a probe tone, thereby enhancing contrast among frequency components. We review how the diverse manifestations of auditory nonlinearity originate in the gating principle of their mechanoelectrical transduction channels; how they depend on the coordinated opening of these ion channels ensured by connecting elements; and their links to the dynamic behavior of auditory sensory cells. This paper also reviews how the complex properties of waves traveling through the cochlea shape the manifestations of auditory nonlinearity. Examination methods based on the detection of distortions open noninvasive windows on the modes of activity of mechanosensitive structures in auditory sensory cells and on the distribution of sites of nonlinearity along the cochlear tonotopic axis, helpful for deciphering cochlear molecular physiology in hearing-impaired animal models. Otoacoustic emissions enable fast tests of peripheral sound processing in patients. The study of auditory distortions also contributes to the understanding of the perception of complex sounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24137017     DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00029.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Rev        ISSN: 0031-9333            Impact factor:   37.312


  29 in total

1.  Distinct roles of stereociliary links in the nonlinear sound processing and noise resistance of cochlear outer hair cells.

Authors:  Woongsu Han; Jeong-Oh Shin; Ji-Hyun Ma; Hyehyun Min; Jinsei Jung; Jinu Lee; Un-Kyung Kim; Jae Young Choi; Seok Jun Moon; Dae Won Moon; Jinwoong Bok; Chul Hoon Kim
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Non-invasive intraoperative monitoring of cochlear function by cochlear microphonics during cerebellopontine-angle surgery.

Authors:  Blandine Lourenço; Béatriz Madero; Stéphane Tringali; Xavier Dubernard; Toufic Khalil; André Chays; Arnaud Bazin; Thierry Mom; Paul Avan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Auditory cortex interneuron development requires cadherins operating hair-cell mechanoelectrical transduction.

Authors:  Baptiste Libé-Philippot; Vincent Michel; Jacques Boutet de Monvel; Sébastien Le Gal; Typhaine Dupont; Paul Avan; Christine Métin; Nicolas Michalski; Christine Petit
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Simultaneous Intracochlear Pressure Measurements from Two Cochlear Locations: Propagation of Distortion Products in Gerbil.

Authors:  Wei Dong
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-01

5.  [Objective audiometry with DPOAEs : New findings for generation mechanisms and clinical applications. German version].

Authors:  D Zelle; E Dalhoff; A W Gummer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  The effects of hypotensive anaesthesia on otoacoustic emissions: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study with objective outcome measures.

Authors:  Ibrahim Aladag; Ziya Kaya; Levent Gurbuzler; Ahmet Eyibilen; Murat Songu; Duzgun Ates; Unal Erkorkmaz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Synaptic transmission between end bulbs of Held and bushy cells in the cochlear nucleus of mice with a mutation in Otoferlin.

Authors:  Samantha Wright; Youngdeok Hwang; Donata Oertel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Differences in postinjury auditory system pathophysiology after mild blast and nonblast acute acoustic trauma.

Authors:  Nicholas Race; Jesyin Lai; Riyi Shi; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  An unusually powerful mode of low-frequency sound interference due to defective hair bundles of the auditory outer hair cells.

Authors:  Kazusaku Kamiya; Vincent Michel; Fabrice Giraudet; Brigitte Riederer; Isabelle Foucher; Samantha Papal; Isabelle Perfettini; Sébastien Le Gal; Elisabeth Verpy; Weiliang Xia; Ursula Seidler; Maria-Magdalena Georgescu; Paul Avan; Aziz El-Amraoui; Christine Petit
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Loss of the tectorial membrane protein CEACAM16 enhances spontaneous, stimulus-frequency, and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Mary Ann Cheatham; Richard J Goodyear; Kazuaki Homma; P Kevin Legan; Julia Korchagina; Souvik Naskar; Jonathan H Siegel; Peter Dallos; Jing Zheng; Guy P Richardson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.