BACKGROUND: We compared the visibility of retinal and choroidal pathologies using high-penetration optical coherence tomography (HP-OCT) with a long-wavelength light source (1,050 nm) and conventional spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) in age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: One hundred and forty-six eyes were included: 63 eyes with AMD, 79 eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), and four eyes with retinal angiomatous proliferation. The SD-OCT and HP-OCT images were compared using the grading criteria to grade the visibility of the retinal changes, the line corresponding to the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and the chorioscleral interface (CSI). In 132 eyes with a pigment epithelial detachment (PED), we graded the structures inside the PED, Bruch's line, and the CSI. We compared the visibility of those changes in eyes with subretinal hyperreflective changes due to a subretinal hemorrhage (SRH) (n = 17) or a hemorrhage inside the PED (HPED) (n = 12). RESULTS: HP-OCT provided superior visibility of the following structures compared to SD-OCT (P < 0.01): the CSI, structures inside the PED, Bruch's line inside the PED, the CSI inside the PED, SRH, type 1 CNV, polyps, and HPED. There were no significant differences between the two OCT devices in the scores for the RPE line, retinal morphology, or type 2 CNV and/or fibrin. CONCLUSION: HP-OCT visualizes morphologies beneath the RPE better than SD-OCT, and is equivalent to SD-OCT for visualizing morphologies above the RPE.
BACKGROUND: We compared the visibility of retinal and choroidal pathologies using high-penetration optical coherence tomography (HP-OCT) with a long-wavelength light source (1,050 nm) and conventional spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) in age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: One hundred and forty-six eyes were included: 63 eyes with AMD, 79 eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), and four eyes with retinal angiomatous proliferation. The SD-OCT and HP-OCT images were compared using the grading criteria to grade the visibility of the retinal changes, the line corresponding to the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), and the chorioscleral interface (CSI). In 132 eyes with a pigment epithelial detachment (PED), we graded the structures inside the PED, Bruch's line, and the CSI. We compared the visibility of those changes in eyes with subretinal hyperreflective changes due to a subretinal hemorrhage (SRH) (n = 17) or a hemorrhage inside the PED (HPED) (n = 12). RESULTS:HP-OCT provided superior visibility of the following structures compared to SD-OCT (P < 0.01): the CSI, structures inside the PED, Bruch's line inside the PED, the CSI inside the PED, SRH, type 1 CNV, polyps, and HPED. There were no significant differences between the two OCT devices in the scores for the RPE line, retinal morphology, or type 2 CNV and/or fibrin. CONCLUSION:HP-OCT visualizes morphologies beneath the RPE better than SD-OCT, and is equivalent to SD-OCT for visualizing morphologies above the RPE.
Authors: Maciej Wojtkowski; Rainer Leitgeb; Andrzej Kowalczyk; Tomasz Bajraszewski; Adolf F Fercher Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Teresa C Chen; Barry Cense; Mark C Pierce; Nader Nassif; B Hyle Park; Seok H Yun; Brian R White; Brett E Bouma; Guillermo J Tearney; Johannes F de Boer Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2005-12
Authors: Boris Povazay; Boris Hermann; Angelika Unterhuber; Bernd Hofer; Harald Sattmann; Florian Zeiler; James E Morgan; Christiane Falkner-Radler; Carl Glittenberg; Susanne Blinder; Wolfgang Drexler Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2007 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Benjamin Potsaid; Bernhard Baumann; David Huang; Scott Barry; Alex E Cable; Joel S Schuman; Jay S Duker; James G Fujimoto Journal: Opt Express Date: 2010-09-13 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Geeta A Lalwani; Philip J Rosenfeld; Anne E Fung; Sander R Dubovy; Stephen Michels; William Feuer; Janet L Davis; Harry W Flynn; Maria Esquiabro Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2009-04-18 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Daniel M de Bruin; Daina L Burnes; John Loewenstein; Yueli Chen; Susie Chang; Teresa C Chen; Daniel D Esmaili; Johannes F de Boer Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-04-04 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Elizabeth A Verner-Cole; John P Campbell; Thomas S Hwang; Michael L Klein; Andreas K Lauer; Dongseok Choi; Steven T Bailey Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2014-05-22 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Chun On Lee; Xiujuan Zhang; Nan Yuan; Shumin Tang; Li Jia Chen; Carol Y Cheung; Jason C Yam Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 4.379