Literature DB >> 24136493

Risk factors for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement during chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer.

Tobin Strom1, Andy M Trotti, Julie Kish, Nikhil G Rao, Judith McCaffrey, Tapan A Padhya, Hui-Yi Lin, William Fulp, Jimmy J Caudell.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing chemoradiotherapy may require percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement because of dehydration or significant weight loss.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the need for the reactive placement of a PEG tube during chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer and to identify patient or tumor factors associated with reactively requiring the placement of a PEG tube. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Single-institution retrospective review of 297 patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma between May 1, 2004, and June 30, 2012, with a minimum follow-up period of 3 months. EXPOSURE: Placement of a PEG tube. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors associated with symptomatic requirement for the reactive placement of a PEG tube.
RESULTS: In total, 128 patients did not receive a prophylactic PEG tube within 10 days of initiation of chemoradiotherapy. Fifteen of 128 patients (11.7%) required the reactive placement of a PEG tube during or within 3 months of chemoradiotherapy. The median time to PEG tube removal was 3.3 months, and 14 of 15 patients had their PEG tube removed at the last follow-up analysis. Independent risk factors for PEG tube placement included the following: accelerated irradiation fractionation (odds ratio, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.1-16.5; P = .04), a tumor T classification of 3 or higher (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.0-11.9; P = .04), a cumulative cisplatin dose of 200 mg/m² or higher (odds ratio, 6.7; 95% CI, 1.2-36.7; P = .03), and a body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of less than 25 (odds ratio, 5.8; 95% CI, 1.4-23.9; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although the overall risk is low, a body mass index of less than 25, accelerated irradiation fractionation, a tumor T classification of 3 or higher, and a cumulative cisplatin dose of 200 mg/m² or higher are associated with symptomatic need for the reactive placement of a PEG tube in patients with oropharyngeal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24136493     DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  12 in total

1.  Validation of an updated evidence-based protocol for proactive gastrostomy tube insertion in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  T E Brown; V Getliffe; M D Banks; B G M Hughes; C Y Lin; L M Kenny; J D Bauer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Pretreatment factors associated with functional oral intake and feeding tube use at 1 and 6 months post-radiotherapy (+/- chemotherapy) for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Molly K Barnhart; Elizabeth C Ward; Bena Cartmill; Rachelle A Robinson; Virginia A Simms; Sophie J Chandler; Elea T Wurth; Robert I Smee
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Clinical predictors for reactive tube feeding in patients with advanced oropharynx cancer receiving radiotherapy ± chemotherapy.

Authors:  Belinda Vangelov; Robert I Smee
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Reduced feeding tube duration with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Analysis.

Authors:  Beth M Beadle; Kai-Ping Liao; Sharon H Giordano; Adam S Garden; Katherine A Hutcheson; Stephen Y Lai; B Ashleigh Guadagnolo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Age most significant predictor of requiring enteral feeding in head-and-neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Sean Sachdev; Tamer Refaat; Ian D Bacchus; Vythialinga Sathiaseelan; Bharat B Mittal
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 6.  Nutritional interventions in head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy: a narrative review.

Authors:  Maurizio Bossola
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Late Feeding Tube Dependency in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated with Definitive Radiation Therapy and Concurrent Systemic Therapy.

Authors:  Cole Friedes; Jessica Klingensmith; Nana Nimo; Jessica Gregor; Ryan Burri
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-04-15

8.  Intravenous fluids for pain management in head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemoradiation.

Authors:  Charlotte I Rivers; Austin J Iovoli; Udit Chatterjee; Gregory M Hermann; Anurag K Singh
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-05

9.  A single-institution, randomized, pilot study evaluating the efficacy of gabapentin and methadone for patients undergoing chemoradiation for head and neck squamous cell cancer.

Authors:  Gregory M Hermann; Austin J Iovoli; Alexis J Platek; Chong Wang; Austin Miller; Kristopher Attwood; Daniel J Bourgeois; Anurag K Singh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 6.921

Review 10.  Narrative review of the management of oral mucositis during chemoradiation for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Lauren F Judge; Mark K Farrugia; Anurag K Singh
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.