Hae Min Kang1, Hyoung Jun Koh. 1. Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare treatment outcomes of photodynamic therapy (PDT), anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy and PDT combined with anti-VEGF therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). PROCEDURES: A total of 62 eyes of 62 patients who had completed at least 2 years of follow-up were retrospectively reviewed; 19 eyes received PDT only, 23 had anti-VEGF therapy only and 20 underwent combination therapy. Best-corrected visual acuity at baseline and each follow-up visit was investigated as a primary outcome measure. RESULTS: At year 2, the PDT and combination groups maintained significant visual improvement (p = 0.041 and p = 0.021), whereas the anti-VEGF group failed to do so (p = 0.673) when compared with the baseline. The combination group showed better visual outcome during follow-up, and significantly better visual outcome than the PDT group (p = 0.038) and the anti-VEGF group (p = 0.012) at year 2. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy leads to significantly better visual outcome than PDT and anti-VEGF monotherapy and is therefore a superior method for treating PCV, with a favorable visual outcome.
PURPOSE: To compare treatment outcomes of photodynamic therapy (PDT), anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy and PDT combined with anti-VEGF therapy for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). PROCEDURES: A total of 62 eyes of 62 patients who had completed at least 2 years of follow-up were retrospectively reviewed; 19 eyes received PDT only, 23 had anti-VEGF therapy only and 20 underwent combination therapy. Best-corrected visual acuity at baseline and each follow-up visit was investigated as a primary outcome measure. RESULTS: At year 2, the PDT and combination groups maintained significant visual improvement (p = 0.041 and p = 0.021), whereas the anti-VEGF group failed to do so (p = 0.673) when compared with the baseline. The combination group showed better visual outcome during follow-up, and significantly better visual outcome than the PDT group (p = 0.038) and the anti-VEGF group (p = 0.012) at year 2. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy leads to significantly better visual outcome than PDT and anti-VEGF monotherapy and is therefore a superior method for treating PCV, with a favorable visual outcome.
Authors: Kai Tang; Jun-Kang Si; Da-Dong Guo; Yan Cui; Yu-Xiang Du; Xue-Mei Pan; Hong-Sheng Bi Journal: Int J Ophthalmol Date: 2015-10-18 Impact factor: 1.779