Photodynamic therapy in combination with intravitreal ziv-aflibercept and aflibercept injection in patients with chronic or repeatedly recurrent acute central serous chorioretinopathy: a single-center retrospective study.

PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to assess the effect of off-label photodynamic therapy (PDT) in combination with intravitreal off-label ziv-aflibercept or off-label aflibercept injection in patients with chronic or repeatedly recurrent acute central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Changes in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and subfoveal subretinal fluid (sSRF) and maximum subretinal fluid (mSRF) were retrospectively analyzed in a single-center cohort study of 17 patients (18 eyes) with persistent subretinal fluid for more than 3 months of duration of CSC. Treatment efficacy was measured between injection and PDT at 30±15 days, 90±15 days and 180±30 days after PDT.
RESULTS: Significant reduction of sSRF and mSRF was shown after therapy with ziv-aflibercept and aflibercept combined with PDT (p<0.001). Course of BCVA showed non-significant improvement within 6 months (p=0.065). One case of allergic reaction after fluorescein angiography and one case of ophthalmic migraine after ziv-aflibercept injection were documented. One case of reversible vision loss occurred during 6 months after combination therapy. No other adverse events or side effects were reported.
CONCLUSION: Combination therapy of ziv-aflibercept and aflibercept with PDT seems to be beneficial, even in cases of chronic or repeatedly recurrent acute CSC. This includes cases of CSC resistant to or recurrent after medical treatment, PDT alone or therapy with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor alone.

Introduction

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is the fourth most common non-surgical retinopathy, mainly affecting middle-aged patients during their working years.1 It is an idiopathic condition that is characterized by serous neurosensory retinal detachment and/or pigment epithelial detachment, most often confined to the posterior pole and associated with leakage of fluid through the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) into the subretinal space. A common characteristic is a thickened choroid on optical coherence tomography (OCT).2,3 Choroidal hyperpermeability and RPE changes are the main factors involved in the pathophysiology.4

While acute CSC is typically self-limited within a few months with good visual outcome, about 10% of patients have several recurrences or a chronic course.4,5 Forty percent have bilateral involvement.6

The chronic course is shown to be a progressive chorioretinopathy with significant irreversible vision loss, decreased contrast sensitivity and/or a central scotoma due to photoreceptor damage, RPE atrophy or choroidal neovascularization (CNV).1,7–9 Chronic CSC leads to significantly lower vision-related quality of life and affects mainly working-aged patients. Therefore, it has a significant impact on patients’ personal and professional lives.10

While there is still no international consensus about a gold standard therapy, thanks to relatively high success rates, PDT is the treatment of choice in cases of chronic CSC, especially if the macula is involved and/or it does not respond to medical treatment.11

Several retrospective studies suggest that treatment of CSC patients is effective in 70%–100% patients with full-dose PDT and in 33%–100% with half-dose PDT.12 In cases not responding to or recurring after first PDT, the procedure can be repeated, but not indefinitely due to potential adverse events like RPE atrophy, choriocapillaris hypoperfusion and secondary CNV.13–15 During PDT, verteporfin dye accumulates around hyperpermeable choroidal vessels because of slow blood flow and vascular congestion. Activation of verteporfin by laser application causes photochemical damage to the choroidal epithelium, thereby leading to short-term choriocapillaris hypoperfusion and long-term remodeling. This in turn leads to the upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).14,16 While early increase of leakage was shown after PDT, VEGF is assumed to be one of the major factors responsible for increased vascular permeability, and can also lead to secondary CNV.17,18 Although these changes are mostly seen with full-dose PDT and decrease with dose reduction, they have also been reported in half-dose PDT.19–23

The upregulation of VEGF after PDT leads to the assumption that patients with CSC benefit from a synergistic effect of PDT combined with anti-VEGF agents.

Anti-VEGF monotherapy is considered to be a safe treatment option with acceptable improvement even in refractory cases, yet there is little known about combination therapy.24–27 Anti-VEGF therapy is assumed to cause a decrease of subretinal fluid (SRF) in CSC by reducing choroidal blood flow and choroidal thickness.28,29 While anti-VEGF monotherapy was not shown to be a promising alternative for PDT in the long run, combination therapy could possibly be a more effective alternative with fewer complications.30,31

Two small retrospective studies investigated the effect of combination therapy with anti-VEGF and PDT in CSC, but used pegaptanib and bevacizumab. Combination therapy seemed to aid in the resolution of SRF and was shown to be a safe treatment option, yet the benefit was not significant.32,33 We investigated the effects of the newer anti-VEGF agent ziv-aflibercept and aflibercept combined with PDT.

Intravitreal aflibercept was shown to be efficient in reducing choroidal thickness and appeared to induce greater reduction of choroidal thickness compared to ranibizumab.34,35

Aflibercept is a fusion protein that binds to VEGF subtypes A and B as well as to placental growth factor and has a greater binding affinity to VEGF than bevacizumab and ranibizumab.36 Aflibercept was also shown to be a safe agent in CSC therapy.37 Ziv-aflibercept contains aflibercept, however, in a higher osmolarity of the buffering solution. Ziv-aflibercept is approved for the intravenous treatment of various malignant tumors. The intravitreal use is off-label, with recent clinical data showing long-term safety and efficacy in retinal diseases.38

At Triemli City Hospital, Zurich, therapy with ziv-aflibercept or aflibercept combined with PDT has been used since 2015 in primarily chronic or repeatedly recurrent acute, therapy-refractory cases of CSC.

We retrospectively analyzed the anatomical and functional outcome of patients with persistent SRF due to CSC treated with a combination of PDT and ziv-aflibercept or aflibercept.

Patients and methods

This retrospective, single-center cohort study of patients with CSC was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zurich, Switzerland, and was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

All included patients signed research consent forms at initial presentation allowing their data to be used for retrospective analysis. In addition, all patients signed an informed consent form for off-label use of PDT and off-label use of ziv-aflibercept and aflibercept.

Primary outcomes were functional and anatomical changes, documented by BCVA, maximum subretinal and subfoveal subretinal fluid (mSRF and sSRF). Treatment effects were measured after intravitreal anti-VEGF injection, before PDT, at 30±15 days, 90±15 days and 180±30 days after PDT. BCVA was measured using Snellen charts and subsequently converted into Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters for statistical analysis. mSRF and sSRF were evaluated by spectral domain Heidelberg Spectralis OCT® (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) with a standard set of 19 B-scans (setting: 512 A-scans, 20°×20°). If mSRF was outside this standard set in some cases, manual scans were performed by medical technical assistants. In cases without additional scans, the mSRF within the standard scan was measured. OCT scans were compared using the “follow-up” mode of the eye-tracking-assisted Heidelberg Spectralis® system (AutoRescan), allowing precise comparison. All SRF measurements were independently performed by two ophthalmologists (JD and FF).

In addition to the OCT examination, all patients underwent a complete ophthalmic examination at each regular visit including BCVA, air-tonometry, slit-lamp examination and fundoscopy.

Eighteen eyes of 17 consecutive patients were evaluated at the Department of Ophthalmology at Triemli City Hospital, Zurich, between 2015 and August 2017, whose treatment consisted of ziv-aflibercept and aflibercept in adjunct with PDT.

Patients who were over 18 years of age, diagnosed with CSC on fluorescein angiography (FA) and indocyanine green angiography, and received intravitreal ziv-aflibercept and aflibercept injection within 30 days prior to PDT were included.

Patients were excluded if other retinal vasculopathies like polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) or CNV secondary to CSC as well as other ocular diseases potentially affecting BCVA were diagnosed. In addition, patients with a history of intraocular surgery within the last 3 months before treatment or intraocular pressure >21 mmHg despite therapy were excluded.

Intravitreal injections of 0.05 mL aflibercept (Eylea®; Bayer Schweiz AG, Zurich, Switzerland) or 0.06–0.07 mL ziv-aflibercept (Zaltrap®; Sanofi-Aventis AG, Vernier, Switzerland) were administered within 30 days prior to treatment with PDT with verteporfin (Visudyne®; Novartis AG, Basel, Switzerland). Ziv-aflibercept was filled into sterile syringes (1.0 mL Luer Lock, article no 309628; Becton Dickinson AG, Allschwil, Switzerland) by the pharmacy at Triemli City Hospital using an isolator system and following national guidelines.

The PDT verteporfin dose was 3 mg/m2 (half dose) or 6 mg/m2 (full dose) based on body surface area. Body surface area was calculated from a normogram based on the height and weight of the patient on the day of treatment. The solution was infused through intravenous access over a 10-minute period. Then, 15 minutes after the start of infusion, laser treatment was applied with a 689 nm diode laser (Coherent Opal Photoactivator; Coherent Inc., Dieburg, Germany) on a slit-lamp delivery system (BQ 900 slit lamp; Haag-Streit AG, Köniz, Switzerland). Laser light was delivered for 83 seconds with a full light fluence of 50 J/cm2 and an intensity of 600 mW/cm2. The size of the PDT spot was determined as the greatest linear dimension of the choroidal hyperpermeable lesion. In cases of multifocal lesions, several laser spots were applied consecutively without overlap. Patients were instructed to avoid direct sunlight and to wear sun glasses while outdoors for the next 48 hours.

Statistical analysis was performed using the R programming language (version 3.3.3; https://www.R-project.org/). The exact sign test was used to compare ETDRS BCVA before treatment and 6 months post-PDT. The intraclass correlation coefficient for SRF measurements was computed for a two-way model estimating agreement for single-measures units. As reliability was excellent (ICC >0.98), the mean was computed and used for all analyses for SRF. The dependent sample t-test (for normally distributed differences) or the exact Wilcoxon signed rank test (for not normally distributed differences) was used to compare central and maximum SRF before treatment with PDT and 1, 3 and 6 months post-PDT. For these tests, a last value carried forward approach was used to replace missing values.

Results

Eighteen eyes of 17 patients with chronic or repeatedly recurrent acute CSC received a combination therapy of ziv-aflibercept or aflibercept and PDT. Seventeen eyes were treated with half-dose PDT, while one eye received full-dose PDT due to recurrence after previous half-dose PDT. Fifteen patients received ziv-aflibercept and 3 patients received aflibercept. Fifteen patients had follow-up measurements at 1 month, 16 patients at 3 months and 14 patients at 6 months.

Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics						ETDRS BCVA		OCT measurements, sSRF/mSRF (μm)
Patient ID	Gender	Age (years)	Eye	Risk factors	Duration of CSC before ZivA-PDT	Baseline	At 6 months	Baseline	At 6 months
1	M	58	OD	CS	>4 years	40	40	193/262	0/0
2	F	52	OD	HT	9 months	75	85	144/149	0/48
3	M	42	OD	S	9 months	80	85	344/366	0/5
4	M	42	OS		1 year*	85	MD	37/107	MD
5	M	68	OD	CS, HT	4 months	60	80	311/327	0/0
6	M	53	OD	HT	8 months	75	MD	234/324	MD
7	M	40	OD	S	1.5 years	70	35	115/233	84/144
8	M	69	OD		6 years	55	70	282/282	112/112
9	M	46	OS	CS, HT	5.5 years	85	85	200/200	0/68
10	M	53	OS	CS	1.5 years	65	85	162/212	0/178
11	M	47	OD		6 months	75	MD	301/301	MD
12	F	67	OD	CS	>3 years	5	MD	184/185	MD
13	M	48	OS		>4.5 years	65	70	199/231	231/240
14	M	51	OD		3.5 years	70	70	316/322	106/107
15	M	64	OS	HT	>4 years	75	75	251/252	177/177
16	M	46	OS	HT	1.5 years	65	75	75/79	14/14
17	M	40	OS		>2.5 years	85	85	100/100	0/117
18	F	61	OD		>1 years	80	75	250/250	30/39
Mean/summary	15 M/3 F	52.6	11 OD/7 OS	6× HT/5× CS 2× S	>28.5 months	67.2	75.0	205/232	54/78
±SD		9.8			>20.0 months	18.8	15.4	86/81	74/72

Note:

Bilateral CSC, diagnosis for 1 year, but symptoms of the treated eye for just 1 month.

Abbreviations: BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; CS, corticosteroids; CSC, central serous chorioretinopathy; ETDRS, Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study; F, female; HT, hypertension; M, male; MD, missing data; mSRF, maximum subretinal fluid; OCT, optical coherence tomography; OD, right eye; OS, left eye; PDT, photodynamic therapy; S, stress; SD, standard deviation; sSRF, subfoveal subretinal fluid; ZivA, ziv-aflibercept and aflibercept.

Patients received various other therapies during observation period. Therapies are listed in Table 2.

Table 2

Treatment

Patient ID	Treatment before ZivA-PDT	Treatment during 1st month after ZivA-PDT	Treatment till 3rd month after ZivA-PDT	Treatment till 6th month after ZivA-PDT
1	Acetazolamide, nepafenac	Eplerenone	Eplerenone	Eplerenone, 1× zivafl, 1× HD-PDT
2	Horse chestnut dry extract, acetazolamide, nepafenac, eplerenone	1× zivafl	1× zivafl	1× FD-PDT
3	Acetazolamide, eplerenone	Melatonin	Spironolactone, 1× zivafl, FD-PDT
4
5	Eplerenone
6
7	Acetazolamide, nepafenac, melatonin			1× zivafl
8	Eplerenone		1× zivafl	1× FD-PDT, 2× zivafl
9	Eplerenone
10	Acetazolamide, nepafenac, eplerenone	Eplerenone	1× zivafl	2× zivafl, 1× HD-PDT
11	Nepafenac, eplerenone		1× zivafl	Rifampicin 1× zivafl, 1× HD-PDT
12	3× bevacizumab
13	Acetazolamide, eplerenone, 2× zivafl, 1× HD-PDT		1× afl	Eplerenone 1× afl
14	Acetazolamide, nepafenac, eplerenone 2× HD-PDT			1× zivafl
15	Acetazolamide, 1× HD-PDT
16	Acetazolamide, 2× zivafl
17	Eplerenone, 1× HD-PDT			1× zivafl
18	Acetazolamide, eplerenone, nepafenac, 2× zivafl		Spironolactone 1× zivafl	1× FD-PDT
Summary	15× medication	3× medication	3× medication	3× medication
	9× intravitreal injection	1× injection	7× injection	9× injection
	5× HD-PDT		1× FD-PDT	3× HD-PDT, 3× FD-PDT

Note: Blank spaces in the table indicate either no treatment before ZivA-PDT or data not available.

Abbreviations: afl, aflibercept; FD, full-dose; HD, half-dose; PDT, photodynamic therapy; ZivA, ziv-aflibercept and aflibercept; zivafl, ziv-aflibercept.

Best corrected visual acuity

The primary endpoint, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change at 6 months follow-up, showed an improvement by a median of 2.5 ETDRS letters from a high median baseline BCVA of 72.5 letters. As shown in Figure 1 and Table 3, this improvement did just not reach statistical significance (p=0.065). Only 1 patient lost more than 5 letters compared to baseline at the 6-month follow-up. Eight patients gained BCVA after 6 months. Five patients showed no change in BCVA from baseline.

Figure 1

ETDRS BCVA.

Notes: Boxplots show median, first and third quartile, upper/lower whisker extends from the hinge to the largest/smallest value no further than 1.5×IQR from the hinge. Dots indicate individual values.

Abbreviations: BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; ETDRS, Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study; IQR, interquartile range; PDT, photodynamic therapy; ZivA, ziv-aflibercept and aflibercept.

Table 3

ETDRS

BCVA (by ETDRS)	Median ETDRS	Interquartile range	Significance
Before treatment	72.50	65.00, 78.75
1 month after PDT	75.00	67.50, 83.50
3 months after PDT	72.50	65.00, 85.00
6 months after PDT	75.00	70.00, 85.00	0.065#

Notes: p-value, comparison with before treatment.

Continuity for the distribution of the paired differences was not given, and therefore a sign test was performed.

Abbreviations: BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; ETDRS, Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study; PDT, photodynamic therapy.

Subfoveal subretinal fluid height

SRF height regressed from a mean of 205.19 μm at baseline to 90.53 μm at month 1 and 53.79 μm at month 6. The mean sSRF height was significantly greater before initiation of treatment compared to 6 months after treatment (p<0.001). At month 6, no patient showed more sSRF than at baseline. At the 6-month follow-up, 13 out of 14 patients showed a reduction of sSRF. Some regression in sSRF (−43.64 μm) was seen after an average of 12 days following the intravitreal injection of ziv-aflibercept and aflibercept alone prior to PDT treatment.

Figure 2 and Table 4 show sSRF height course for the whole group of patients.

Figure 2

Subfoveal SRF.

Notes: Boxplots show median, first and third quartile, upper/lower whisker extends from the hinge to the largest/smallest value no further than 1.5×IQR from the hinge. Dots indicate individual values.

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; PDT, photodynamic therapy; SRF, subretinal fluid; ZivA, ziv-aflibercept and aflibercept.

Table 4

sSRF

	Mean sSRF (μm)	SD	Significance
sSRF before treatment	205.19	88.45
sSRF after injection, before PDT	161.56	94.77	0.002#
sSRF 1 month after PDT	90.53	88.24	<0.001
sSRF 3 months after PDT	134.97	104.55	0.008
sSRF 6 months after PDT	53.79	76.50	<0.001

Notes: p-value, comparison with before treatment.

Paired differences were not normally distributed, and therefore an exact Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed.

Abbreviations: PDT, photodynamic therapy; SD, standard deviation; sSRF, subfoveal subretinal fluid.

Maximum subretinal fluid height

mSRF decreased in two steps. The first improvement was shown between the ziv-aflibercept and aflibercept injection and PDT (−52.78 μm, p=0.002); the second improvement occurred after PDT. The mean mSRF height reduction was −114.47 μm at month 1 (p<0.001), −101.11 μm at month 3 (p=0.008) and −146.75 μm at month 6 (p<0.001). Thirteen patients showed a reduction of mSRF at the 6-month measurement (n=14). One patient had no relevant change in mSRF between initial and final measurement.

Changes in sSRF are shown in Figure 3 and Table 5.

Figure 3

Maximum SRF.

Notes: Boxplots show median, first and third quartile, upper/lower whisker extends from the hinge to the largest/smallest value no further than 1.5×IQR from the hinge. Dots indicate individual values.

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; PDT, photodynamic therapy; SRF, subretinal fluid; ZivA, ziv-aflibercept and aflibercept.

Table 5

mSRF

	Mean mSRF (μm)	SD	Significance
mSRF before treatment	232.17	83.77
mSRF after injection, before PDT	179.39	84.34	<0.001#
mSRF 1 month after PDT	106.80	90.80	<0.001
mSRF 3 months after PDT	143.06	97.97	0.002
mSRF 6 months after PDT	77.54	74.21	<0.001

Notes: p-value, comparison with before treatment.

Paired differences were not normally distributed, and therefore an exact Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed.

Abbreviations: mSRF, maximum subretinal fluid; PDT, photodynamic therapy; SD, standard deviation.

Safety

One case of ophthalmic migraine after intravitreal injection and one case of allergic reaction to the FA were documented. None of the eyes experienced adverse events following the intravitreal injection of ziv-aflibercept/aflibercept. One patient had transient vision loss of more than 10 letters in ETDRS BCVA but recovered to baseline ETDRS BCVA after observation period.

Discussion

Our results indicate improved functional and anatomic outcomes in patients with persistent SRF in chronic or repeatedly recurrent acute CSC patients after a combination therapy of ziv-aflibercept and aflibercept and PDT, despite a long history of CSC (28.5 months, standard deviation 20.0 months, range 4 months–6 years) and multiple prior treatments.

Reduction of SRF occurred in two steps. While first reduction of mSRF and sSRF was seen after the intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment with ziv-aflibercept and aflibercept, the second improvement was seen after PDT. BCVA could be stabilized at baseline levels after therapy and during the observation period.

The fact that vision improvement did not quite reach a statistical significance might be attributed to two factors. First, there could be the irreversible retinal and RPE changes in patients with chronic CSC. Second, the high good baseline visual acuity limits the possibility for vision improvement (ceiling effect). In this context, not losing vision could be considered as a good functional outcome.

The good baseline visual acuity, despite the long duration of CSC, might be explained by a relevant number of patients with repeatedly recurrent acute CSC over a long period of time versus patients with chronic persistent CSC over a long time period.

Despite an initial anatomic benefit following ziv-aflibercept and aflibercept only, it remains difficult to judge whether the combined treatment has an additional benefit, especially since there is no control group.

Yet the idea of a synergistic effect is supported by results in other entities with pachychoroid (which were excluded in our study) like PCV where combination therapy seemed to be beneficial.39,40 Mukai et al showed a protective effect of combination therapy of bevacizumab with PDT compared to PDT alone in patients with PCV. Less choriocapillaris occlusions were found in the group that received combination therapy.41 Combination therapy was also shown to be beneficial in the long-term.42

In the present study, although good short-term results were demonstrated at 1st month measurement, sSRF and mSRF showed evidence of recurrence after 3 months of treatment. Twelve of 18 patients required retreatment within 6 months, indicating that in these selected, quite chronic respectively recurrent cases of CSC (high number of various prior treatments), the combination of ziv-aflibercept and aflibercept and PDT is only able to achieve short-term improvements in most patients in this study.

Following treatments were indicated faster, and even within the 1st month (3 of 18 eyes), which is at least partly due to the retrospective study design.32,33 The variety of treatments applied after combination therapy (Table 2) is a limitation of our study, but also indicates the complexity and challenge inherent in this specific patient population. The limited duration of effect in a high number of eyes (12 of 18) following the combination therapy used in this study stands in contrast to the results of the two other studies of Arevalo and Maier, in which combination therapy of bevacizumab and pegaptanib with full-dose PDT in CSC showed good long-term results.32,33 Arevalo and Espinoza showed better visual outcome in combination therapy, although not significantly compared to PDT alone within 12 months. PDT was not repeated in the study group of 8 patients compared to 8 more PDT sessions in PDT group of 10 patients within 12 months of observation group.33 One difference in their study protocol was the time of anti-VEGF injection. While Arevalo and Espinoza and Maier et al injected anti-VEGF immediately after PDT, the injection time of the present study was up to 30 days prior to PDT.32,33 While verteporfin dye accumulates around hyperpermeable areas, the injection of anti-VEGF before PDT could have a negative effect on the efficacy of PDT by reducing hyperpermeability. We, however, selected this treatment strategy to block VEGF, as upregulation of VEGF is a known and potentially unfavorable consequence of PDT. Another difference of our study compared to the two studies already mentioned is the longer mean duration of CSC before treatment, that is, 28.5 months compared to 11.6 months and 15.3 months, as well as the number of pretreatments (15× medical treatment, 9× intravitreal injections, 5× PDT on 18 eyes), which was higher compared to Maier et al (no detailed information on 9 eyes) and Arevalo and Espinoza (2× PDT, 1× intravitreal injection on 8 eyes).32,33 While in the present study, 17 eyes received half-dose PDT and one eye received full-dose PDT, the study protocols of Arevalo and Espinoza and Maier et al used full-dose PDT in all cases.32,33 In our study the duration of treatment effect was less favorable compared to the results of Maier et al and Arevalo and Espinoza.32,33 It remains unclear if this is due to the selected treatment strategy or due to the selected patient population. We consider the higher affinity for VEGF of the VEGF inhibitors used in our study less likely to be the reason for the difference in durability.

At 6 months, sSRF and mSRF decreased again; yet due to the many retreatments during this period, our long-term data cannot be interpreted as a success of combination therapy but rather as a success of persistent search for the optimal individualized treatment regime and in some cases a success of repeating injections.

Although individual cases of chronic or recurrent acute CSC courses must not be over-interpreted due to the common “waxing and waning” in the natural course of chronic CSC, it must be mentioned that overall results appear helpful in the management of these chronic or repeatedly recurrent acute and difficult to manage cases. Three cases had an optimal treatment response (≤15 microns of SRF) without recurrence within the observation period and without any need for further treatment.

Our study was too small to draw conclusions from subgroups but similar predictive factors as in anti-VEGF monotherapy may play a role. Kim et al identified clinical characteristics for good responders to intravitreal bevacizumab monotherapy in CSC, that is, better vision, smaller lesion and thicker choroid at baseline. It was also suggested that successive treatment with anti-VEGF injections is beneficial in the so-called responders to anti-VEGF.43 This seems reasonable in regard to the pharmacokinetics and the limited half-life of available anti-VEGF drugs, whereas aflibercept appears to have the longest duration of effect in the eye among all the currently available VEGF inhibitors.44

Conclusion

Our results suggest that short-term improvements in BCVA and a reduction of SRF can be achieved by combination therapy and that further monotherapy and combination therapies can sustain the beneficial effects. However, it is also obvious that combination therapy with ziv-aflibercept and aflibercept and PDT is far from an ideal treatment strategy in this specific patient population with chronic respectively repeatedly recurrent acute CSC. Further larger and controlled studies are required to obtain definite answers for this specific patient population. Despite these limitations, the combination therapy of ziv-aflibercept and aflibercept with PDT appears to be safe for up to 6 months and is therefore a potential treatment option for this challenging disease.