Literature DB >> 24135417

Cost utility analysis of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Kevin J Renfree1, Steven J Hattrup, Yu-Hui H Chang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty provides satisfactory outcomes, but its cost-effectiveness is unproven. We prospectively analyzed outcomes and costs for primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
METHODS: Thirty serial patients (16 women and 14 men; mean age, 74.1 years [range, 61.1-87.3 years]) with rotator cuff arthropathy had active motion recorded and completed function tests (visual pain analog scale; Simple Shoulder Test; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Outcome score; EuroQol; and Short Form-36 Health Survey) preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 and 2 years. Costs included professional fees, operating room and supply costs, and hospital care. Changes were compared by the Wilcoxon signed rank test, and quality-adjusted life-years were calculated preoperatively and postoperatively.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients completed the study. Clinical and functional outcomes demonstrated significant improvement (P < .05). Significantly improved (P < .05) Short Form-36 subgroups included physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, vitality, and physical composite score. EuroQol dimensions of usual activities and pain/discomfort improved significantly (P < .05). Calculations with the SF-6D showed that median QALYs improved from 6.56 preoperatively to 7.43 at 1-year follow-up (P <.09) and from 6.56 preoperatively to 7.58 at 2-year follow-up (P <.003). The increase in QALYs calculated from the EQ-5D was somewhat greater, changing from 6.21 preoperatively to 7.69 at 1-year follow-up (P <.0001) and from 6.13 to 8.10 at 2-year follow-up (P <.04). Mean cost was $21,536. Cost utility at 2 years was $26,920/quality-adjusted life-year by the Short Form 6 Dimensions and $16,747/quality-adjusted life-year by the EuroQol.
CONCLUSION: EuroQol and Short Form-36 results demonstrated modestly cost-effective (<$50,000/quality-adjusted life-year) improvement for cuff tear arthropathy patients after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, economic and decision analysis.
Copyright © 2013 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost-effectiveness; Economic and Decision Analysis; Level II; cost utility; quality-adjusted life-years; reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24135417      PMCID: PMC4440574          DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  18 in total

1.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.

Authors:  John Brazier; Jennifer Roberts; Mark Deverill
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  EuroQol: the current state of play.

Authors:  R Brooks
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Cost-utility analyses in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Carmen A Brauer; Allison B Rosen; Natalia V Olchanski; Peter J Neumann
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years.

Authors:  Jacques Guery; Luc Favard; François Sirveaux; Didier Oudet; Daniel Mole; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  Interpretation of cost-effectiveness analyses.

Authors:  D K Owens
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey.

Authors:  J Brazier; T Usherwood; R Harper; K Thomas
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Reverse prostheses in arthropathies with cuff tear: are survivorship and function maintained over time?

Authors:  Luc Favard; Christophe Levigne; Cécile Nerot; Christian Gerber; Lieven De Wilde; Daniel Mole
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of total ankle arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nelson F SooHoo; Gerald Kominski
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Cost-effectiveness analyses of elective orthopaedic surgical procedures in patients with inflammatory arthropathies.

Authors:  H Osnes-Ringen; M K Kvamme; I S Kristiansen; M Thingstad; J E Henriksen; T K Kvien; H Dagfinrud
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 10.  Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Olivier Ethgen; Olivier Bruyère; Florent Richy; Charles Dardennes; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  13 in total

1.  Expanding roles for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Jay D Keener
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

Review 2.  Cost-utility studies in upper limb orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review of published literature.

Authors:  P V Rajan; Rameez A Qudsi; G S M Dyer; E Losina
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 3.  Advances and Update on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stephen G Thon; Adam J Seidl; Jonathan T Bravman; Eric C McCarty; Felix H Savoie; Rachel M Frank
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-02

Review 4.  Is there evidence that the outcomes of primary anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty are getting better?

Authors:  Jeremy S Somerson; Moni B Neradilek; Jason E Hsu; Benjamin C Service; Albert O Gee; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Is Advanced Imaging to Assess Rotator Cuff Integrity Before Shoulder Arthroplasty Cost-effective? A Decision Modeling Study.

Authors:  Jay M Levin; John Wickman; Alexander L Lazarides; Daniel J Cunningham; Daniel E Goltz; Richard C Mather; Oke Anakwenze; Tally E Lassiter; Christopher S Klifto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Is the Most Cost-effective Treatment Strategy for Proximal Humerus Fractures in Older Adults: A Cost-utility Analysis.

Authors:  Hassaan Abdel Khalik; Brittany Humphries; Michael Zoratti; Daniel Axelrod; Colin Kruse; Bill Ristevski; Krishan Rajaratnam; Michael Gardner; Jean-Éric Tarride; Herman Johal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Does arthroscopic subacromial decompression improve quality of life.

Authors:  U Butt; A Whiteman; J Wilson; E Paul; B Roy
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Cost-effectiveness of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Does indication affect outcome?

Authors:  Jamie A Nicholson; Rhiannon Jones; Deborah J MacDonald; Iain Brown; Julie McBirnie
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-01-23

9.  Surgeon-Directed Cost Variation in Isolated Rotator Cuff Repair.

Authors:  E Bailey Terhune; Peter C Cannamela; Jared S Johnson; Charles D Saad; John Barnes; Janette Silbernagel; Thomas Faciszewski; Kevin G Shea
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-12-16

10.  Redefining the Economics of Geriatric Orthopedics.

Authors:  Jeremy Truntzer; Christopher Nacca; David Paller; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2014-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.