Literature DB >> 24135303

Renal artery stenosis in patients with resistant hypertension.

Marcin Protasiewicz1, Jacek Kądziela, Karol Początek, Rafał Poręba, Maciej Podgórski, Arkadiusz Derkacz, Aleksander Prejbisz, Andrzej Mysiak, Andrzej Januszewicz, Adam Witkowski.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the significance of renal translesional pressure gradients in predicting improvement in resistant hypertension after stenting for moderate renal artery stenosis (RAS). In 37 patients with RAS and resistant hypertension subjected to renal stenting, translesional pressure gradients both at rest and hyperemic were measured using a pressure guidewire. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements were performed in all patients on admission and 3 months after the intervention. Angioplasty was successful in all patients, with reduction of artery diameter stenosis from 60 ± 12% to 10 ± 6% (p <0.0001). At 3 months, with maintained hypotensive agents (4.0 ± 1.4 vs 4.0 ± 1.6), significant reductions in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure were noted (-5 and -2 mm Hg, respectively). In multivariate analysis, the mean baseline gradient (MBG) was the only independent predictor of improvement in SBP (regression coefficient 0.292; standard error 0.11; p value 0.014). In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, MBG had a larger area under the curve than other parameters, and the MBG >22 mm Hg had the highest sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy (50%, 95%, and 0.74%, respectively) in predicting hypertension improvement after stenting. In patients with MBG >22 mm Hg, SBP decreased by 12 versus 3 mm Hg (p <0.01) in patients with MBG ≤22 mm Hg, whereas diastolic blood pressure in both groups decreased by 3 versus 1 mm Hg, respectively (NS). In conclusion, MBG value of >22 mm Hg provides the highest accuracy in predicting hypertension improvement after stenting for moderate RAS in patients with resistant hypertension.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24135303     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.06.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

Review 1.  Renal Artery Stenosis in Patients with Resistant Hypertension: Stent It or Not?

Authors:  Patricia Van der Niepen; Patrick Rossignol; Jean-Philippe Lengelé; Elena Berra; Pantelis Sarafidis; Alexandre Persu
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  How should we define appropriate patients for percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty treatment?

Authors:  Yoshio Iwashima; Toshihiko Ishimitsu
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.872

3.  Predictors of cardiac benefits of renal artery stenting from a multicentre retrospective registry.

Authors:  Yuri Nakajima; Osami Kawarada; Akihiro Higashimori; Yoshiaki Yokoi; Kan Zen; Hitoshi Anzai; Hideki Doi; Seiji Hokimoto; Shigenori Ito; Taku Kato; Teruyoshi Kume; Yoshiaki Shintani; Shuzou Tanimoto; Yoshinori Tsubakimoto; Makoto Utsunomiya; Kunihiro Nishimura; Satoshi Yasuda
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2017-09-14

Review 4.  Where and when device therapy may be useful in the management of drug-resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Herbert D Aronow; Jun Li; Sahil A Parikh
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Long-term outcomes and determinants of stenosis recurrence after renal artery angioplasty in hypertensive patients with renovascular disease.

Authors:  Agnieszka Rosławiecka; Anna Kabłak-Ziembicka; Rafał Badacz; Daniel Rzeźnik; Piotr Pieniążek; Mariusz Trystuła; Tadeusz Przewłocki
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 1.426

6.  Pressure gradient measurement to verify hemodynamic results of the chimney endovascular aortic repair (chEVAR) technique.

Authors:  Artur Igor Milnerowicz; Aleksandra Milnerowicz; Tomasz Bańkowski; Marcin Protasiewicz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.