Literature DB >> 24135253

Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness in mandibular prognathic patients with neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.

Chiung Shing Huang1, Jason Jia-Syuan Syu, Ellen Wen-Ching Ko, Yu Ray Chen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The buccal cortical thickness (BCT) between the mandibular canal and the corresponding external cortical surface was compared in patients with and without neurosensory disturbance (NSD) after they underwent a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) to correct mandibular prognathism. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective cohort study was conducted in 146 patients (95 women, 65.1%; 51 men, 34.9%) 18 to 39 years old who underwent bimaxillary surgery (ie, Le Fort I osteotomy and BSSO) to correct mandibular prognathism. NSD was identified using a light touch test with a Semmes-Weinstein monofilament and a pricking pain test with a sharp dental explorer 1 week after surgery. Preoperative cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging was used to visualize the bone contacts or fusion of the mandibular canal to the buccal cortical bone and to decrease injury to the mandibular nerve during surgical dissection. Preoperative CBCT imaging also was used to assess the BCT every 2 mm from the mandibular foramen to the furcation of the mandibular first molar in the NSD group and the sensory normal (N) group.
RESULTS: The incidence of NSD was 32.5% at 1 week after surgery. There was no statistically significant difference between men and women, the side affected, or genioplasty at the time of undergoing BSSO. Of the total sample group, decreased BCT was identified throughout the observed length of the mandibular canal in the NSD group compared with the N group. Statistically significant decreased BCTs were 16 to 20 mm and 24 mm in the total sample, 6 to 8 mm in the female group, and 16 to 18 mm in the male group.
CONCLUSION: Compared with the N group, BCTs in the NSD group were always decreased, especially those located at 16 to 20 mm and 24 mm in the total sample, 6 to 8 mm in the female group, and 16 to 18 mm in the male group.
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24135253     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  10 in total

1.  Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis of the Course and Position of Mandibular Canal.

Authors:  Hooman Khorshidi; Saeed Raoofi; Janan Ghapanchi; Shoaleh Shahidi; Maryam Paknahad
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-09-09

2.  The variable position of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) in the mandibular ramus: a computed tomography (CT) study.

Authors:  Andrew Y E Yeh; Brian P Finn; Robert H B Jones; Alastair N Goss
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Surgical implications of the anatomic situation of the mandibular canal for mandibular osteotomies: a cone beam computed tomographic study.

Authors:  P Nicol; T Loncle; G Pasquet; C Vacher
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 4.  Systematic review of preoperative mandibular canal position as it relates to postoperative neurosensory disturbance following the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  J Rich; B A Golden; C Phillips
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  Sensitive nerve function measurement in facial trauma: An observational study.

Authors:  Edson-Luiz Cetira-Filho; Fábio-Wildson-Gurgel Costa; Saulo-Ellery Santos; Manoel-de Jesus-Rodrigues Mello; Paulo-Goberlânio-de Barros Silva; Andréa-Silvia-Walter de Aguiar
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-01-01

6.  Does Sensory Retraining Improve Subjective Rating of Sensory Impairment after Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy?

Authors:  Yea-Ling Yang; Ellen Wen-Ching Ko; Yu-Ray Chen; Chiung Shing Huang
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-05-14

7.  Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy in the Shortest Buccal Bone Marrow Distances of the Mandible on the Coronal Plane.

Authors:  Chun-Ming Chen; Han-Jen Hsu; Ping-Ho Chen; Shih-Wei Liang; I-Ling Lin; Kun-Jung Hsu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Differences in the Buccal Bone Marrow Distance of ≤0.8 mm in the Mandible of Patients Undergoing Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy among the Different Skeletal Patterns: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Yu-Chuan Tseng; Shih-Wei Liang; Szu-Ting Chou; Shih-Chieh Chen; Chin-Yun Pan; Chun-Ming Chen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Computer-Assisted Orthognathic Surgery for Patients with Cleft Lip/Palate: From Traditional Planning to Three-Dimensional Surgical Simulation.

Authors:  Daniel Lonic; Betty Chien-Jung Pai; Kazuaki Yamaguchi; Peerasak Chortrakarnkij; Hsiu-Hsia Lin; Lun-Jou Lo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Inferior alveolar nerve canal position in relation to mandibular molars: A cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  K C Vidya; Jugajyoti Pathi; Sanjeeb Rout; Alok Sethi; N C Sangamesh
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-11-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.