AIMS: To compare a brief versus a brief plus intensive self-help version of 'Balance', a fully automated online alcohol intervention, on self-reported alcohol consumption. DESIGN: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Participants in both conditions received an online single session screening procedure including personalized normative feedback. The control group also received an online booklet about the effects of alcohol. The treatment group received the online multi-session follow-up program, Balance. SETTING: Online study in Norway. PARTICIPANTS: At-risk drinkers were recruited by internet advertisements and assigned randomly to one of the two conditions (n = 244). MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was self-reported alcohol consumption the previous week measured 6 months after screening. FINDINGS: Regression analysis, using baseline carried forward imputation (intent-to-treat), with baseline variables as covariates, showed that intervention significantly affected alcohol consumption at 6 months (B = 2.96; 95% confidence interval = 0.02-5.90; P = 0.049). Participants in the intensive self-help group drank an average of three fewer standard alcohol units compared with participants in the brief self-help group. CONCLUSIONS: The online Balance intervention, added to a brief online screening intervention, may aid reduction in alcohol consumption compared with the screening intervention and an educational booklet.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To compare a brief versus a brief plus intensive self-help version of 'Balance', a fully automated online alcohol intervention, on self-reported alcohol consumption. DESIGN: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Participants in both conditions received an online single session screening procedure including personalized normative feedback. The control group also received an online booklet about the effects of alcohol. The treatment group received the online multi-session follow-up program, Balance. SETTING: Online study in Norway. PARTICIPANTS: At-risk drinkers were recruited by internet advertisements and assigned randomly to one of the two conditions (n = 244). MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was self-reported alcohol consumption the previous week measured 6 months after screening. FINDINGS: Regression analysis, using baseline carried forward imputation (intent-to-treat), with baseline variables as covariates, showed that intervention significantly affected alcohol consumption at 6 months (B = 2.96; 95% confidence interval = 0.02-5.90; P = 0.049). Participants in the intensive self-help group drank an average of three fewer standard alcohol units compared with participants in the brief self-help group. CONCLUSIONS: The online Balance intervention, added to a brief online screening intervention, may aid reduction in alcohol consumption compared with the screening intervention and an educational booklet.
Authors: Brian D Kiluk; Lara A Ray; Justin Walthers; Michael Bernstein; Jeffery S Tonigan; Molly Magill Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Eric A Dedert; Jennifer R McDuffie; Roy Stein; J Murray McNiel; Andrzej S Kosinski; Caroline E Freiermuth; Adam Hemminger; John W Williams Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2015-08-04 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Eileen Fs Kaner; Fiona R Beyer; Claire Garnett; David Crane; Jamie Brown; Colin Muirhead; James Redmore; Amy O'Donnell; James J Newham; Frank de Vocht; Matthew Hickman; Heather Brown; Gregory Maniatopoulos; Susan Michie Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-09-25
Authors: Claire Garnett; David Crane; Robert West; Susan Michie; Jamie Brown; Adam Winstock Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Mikkel Magnus Thørrisen; Tore Bonsaksen; Jens Christoffer Skogen; Lisebet Skeie Skarpaas; Aleksandra Sevic; Willem van Mechelen; Randi Wågø Aas Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-06-25
Authors: Andrew Jones; Elly McGrath; Katrijn Houben; Chantal Nederkoorn; Eric Robinson; Matt Field Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 3.295