Literature DB >> 24134065

Suprasegmental lexical stress cues in visual speech can guide spoken-word recognition.

Alexandra Jesse1, James M McQueen.   

Abstract

Visual cues to the individual segments of speech and to sentence prosody guide speech recognition. The present study tested whether visual suprasegmental cues to the stress patterns of words can also constrain recognition. Dutch listeners use acoustic suprasegmental cues to lexical stress (changes in duration, amplitude, and pitch) in spoken-word recognition. We asked here whether they can also use visual suprasegmental cues. In two categorization experiments, Dutch participants saw a speaker say fragments of word pairs that were segmentally identical but differed in their stress realization (e.g., 'ca-vi from cavia "guinea pig" vs. 'ka-vi from kaviaar "caviar"). Participants were able to distinguish between these pairs from seeing a speaker alone. Only the presence of primary stress in the fragment, not its absence, was informative. Participants were able to distinguish visually primary from secondary stress on first syllables, but only when the fragment-bearing target word carried phrase-level emphasis. Furthermore, participants distinguished fragments with primary stress on their second syllable from those with secondary stress on their first syllable (e.g., pro-'jec from projector "projector" vs. 'pro-jec from projectiel "projectile"), independently of phrase-level emphasis. Seeing a speaker thus contributes to spoken-word recognition by providing suprasegmental information about the presence of primary lexical stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24134065     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.834371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  6 in total

1.  English Listeners Use Suprasegmental Cues to Lexical Stress Early During Spoken-Word Recognition.

Authors:  Alexandra Jesse; Katja Poellmann; Ying-Yee Kong
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Low-frequency fine-structure cues allow for the online use of lexical stress during spoken-word recognition in spectrally degraded speech.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Beat gestures influence which speech sounds you hear.

Authors:  Hans Rutger Bosker; David Peeters
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 5.530

Review 4.  Neural pathways for visual speech perception.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Einat Liebenthal
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Evidence For Selective Adaptation and Recalibration in the Perception of Lexical Stress.

Authors:  Hans Rutger Bosker
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 1.835

6.  Visual speech discrimination and identification of natural and synthetic consonant stimuli.

Authors:  Benjamin T Files; Bosco S Tjan; Jintao Jiang; Lynne E Bernstein
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.