Literature DB >> 24133504

The importance and application of the ancestral recombination graph.

Miguel Arenas1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  ancestral material; ancestral recombination graph; phylogenetic bias; recombinant fragment; recombination breakpoints; recombination network

Year:  2013        PMID: 24133504      PMCID: PMC3796270          DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Genet        ISSN: 1664-8021            Impact factor:   4.599


× No keyword cloud information.
One of the most important evolutionary forces is recombination, it increases genetic diversity and promotes adaptation through exchange of genetic material and where existent mutations are shuffled. Knowledge about recombination is, for example, fundamental to understand genome structure (Reich et al., 2001), phenotypic diversity (Zhang et al., 2002), and diverse genetic diseases (Daly et al., 2001). Indeed, recombination should be considered to properly study molecular evolution and perform phylogenetic inferences (e.g., Schierup and Hein, 2000; Anisimova et al., 2003; Arenas and Posada, 2010c). The recombination evolutionary history is commonly represented by the ancestral recombination graph (ARG) (Griffiths and Marjoram, 1997), an illustrative example is shown in Figure 1. Counterintuitively, ARGs have not been widely used, perhaps as a consequence of the difficulties to infer explicit ARGs and the complexity of the ARG representation. The aim of this general commentary is to describe the importance and application of the ARG.
Figure 1

Illustrative example of an ARG. RE indicates recombination events. Numbers in nodes indicate intervals of ancestral material. Note that each recombinant fragment (1–2, 3–6, and 7–9) has its own most recent common ancestor (MRCA), all of which finally coalesce into a grand MRCA (GMRCA). At the bottom, the trees corresponding to each recombinant fragment are shown.

Illustrative example of an ARG. RE indicates recombination events. Numbers in nodes indicate intervals of ancestral material. Note that each recombinant fragment (1–2, 3–6, and 7–9) has its own most recent common ancestor (MRCA), all of which finally coalesce into a grand MRCA (GMRCA). At the bottom, the trees corresponding to each recombinant fragment are shown.

Working with the ARG

A key aspect of ARG software is the ARG format. Notice that the description of an ARG is not straightforward because it is not a simple phylogenetic network and therefore, it cannot be represented by a classic network format [e.g., Extended Newick; see Arenas et al. (2010)]. Any ARG format must include not only the evolutionary history, but also the regions with ancestral material (material that reaches the sample) for each node (see Figure 1). Only a few ARG formats have been developed so far (Buendia and Narasimhan, 2006; Vos et al., 2012) and there is a need for a standard format that would allow an easy communication among different ARG software. In this regard, recently McGill et al. (2013) presented the ArgML format that is based on XML syntax and can include detailed information about the ARG (e.g., recombination breakpoints and ancestral material). These features suggest ArgML as a successful candidate to the standard ARG format. Several methods and computer tools exist to simulate and infer ARGs. From the simulation perspective, to my knowledge, only two programs can output a simulated ARG, namely, Serial NetEvolve (Buendia and Narasimhan, 2006) and NetRecodon (Arenas and Posada, 2010a). Most of simulation tools only simulate a tree for each recombinant fragment, but these trees can be then combined to generate the ARG by using tools like CombineTrees (see Woolley et al., 2008). On the other hand, the inference of ARGs is complex and computationally extensive (see Rasmussen and Siepel, 2013 and references therein). For this reason, a common procedure to infer an ARG consists of the detection of recombination breakpoints (see Martin et al., 2011) followed by a phylogenetic tree reconstruction for each recombinant fragment and finally, a combination of all the reconstructed trees. Actually, the IRiS tool (Javed et al., 2011) has automated this whole procedure described above. However, in recent years, new methods to directly infer ARGs are emerging. For example, ACG (O'Fallon, 2013) that is based on a Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) procedure to compute the full likelihood of the ARG, or ARGweaver (Rasmussen and Siepel, 2013) that is based on hidden Markov models (HMM) and can infer ARGs from genome-wide data.

Applying the ARG

ARGs can be applied for a variety of purposes, some examples are described below. Detailed visualization and understanding of relationships among lineages, timing of recombination events and genetic exchange (e.g., Utro et al., 2012). The ARG can be used in a variety of population genetics inferences related with demographics, population divergence times, migration and selection. Note that these population genetics scenarios may affect the length and shape of the ARG (Hudson and Kaplan, 1988; Griffiths and Marjoram, 1997; Rasmussen and Siepel, 2013). For example, it is known that variable population sizes can alter the branch lengths, in particular coalescences are more likely to occur when the population is small. Therefore, the ARG can be used to find correlations between recombination rate and population size over time (e.g., Birkner et al., 2013). Recombination can bias phylogenetic tree reconstruction (e.g., Schierup and Hein, 2000; Posada and Crandall, 2002) and derived inferences (Anisimova et al., 2003; Arenas and Posada, 2010a,b,c). In order to avoid such a bias, trees embedded in the ARG can be used to correctly perform phylogenetic estimations (e.g., ancestral sequence reconstruction or molecular adaptation) accounting for recombination (e.g., Perez-Losada et al., 2009, 2011). Molecular evolution can be simulated over an ARG (e.g., Buendia and Narasimhan, 2006) and the simulated genetic data can be applied for hypothesis testing, to evaluate analytical tools (see the reviews Arenas, 2012, 2013) or to estimate evolutionary parameters by using approaches like approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) (Wilson et al., 2009; Lopes et al., in press).

Conclusions

The ARG is indispensable to study evolutionary scenarios where recombination has occurred. With the development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies there is a growing number of genomes at our disposal, many of which could have evolved under recombination (e.g., Utro et al., 2012; Rasmussen and Siepel, 2013). As a consequence, the importance and application of ARGs is expected to increase over the next years. In order to make progress in the use of ARGs, a key aspect is the design of a standard format to represent the ARG. In this regard, McGill et al. (2013) presented a format based on XML syntax that can easily be used to store and communicate ARGs.
  26 in total

1.  Genome shuffling leads to rapid phenotypic improvement in bacteria.

Authors:  Ying-Xin Zhang; Kim Perry; Victor A Vinci; Keith Powell; Willem P C Stemmer; Stephen B del Cardayré
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Computational design of centralized HIV-1 genes.

Authors:  Miguel Arenas; David Posada
Journal:  Curr HIV Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.581

3.  Serial NetEvolve: a flexible utility for generating serially-sampled sequences along a tree or recombinant network.

Authors:  Patricia Buendia; Giri Narasimhan
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  IRiS: construction of ARG networks at genomic scales.

Authors:  Asif Javed; Marc Pybus; Marta Melé; Filippo Utro; Jaume Bertranpetit; Francesc Calafell; Laxmi Parida
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  Analysing recombination in nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  Darren P Martin; Philippe Lemey; David Posada
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 7.090

6.  An ancestral recombination graph for diploid populations with skewed offspring distribution.

Authors:  Matthias Birkner; Jochen Blath; Bjarki Eldon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The coalescent process in models with selection and recombination.

Authors:  R R Hudson; N L Kaplan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Phylodynamics of HIV-1 from a phase III AIDS vaccine trial in Bangkok, Thailand.

Authors:  Marcos Pérez-Losada; David V Jobes; Faruk Sinangil; Keith A Crandall; Miguel Arenas; David Posada; Phillip W Berman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  ACG: rapid inference of population history from recombining nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  Brendan D O'Fallon
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  A comparison of phylogenetic network methods using computer simulation.

Authors:  Steven M Woolley; David Posada; Keith A Crandall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Methodologies for Microbial Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction.

Authors:  Miguel Arenas
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  Spatial and temporal simulation of human evolution. Methods, frameworks and applications.

Authors:  Macarena Benguigui; Miguel Arenas
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.236

Review 3.  Forensic genetics and genomics: Much more than just a human affair.

Authors:  Miguel Arenas; Filipe Pereira; Manuela Oliveira; Nadia Pinto; Alexandra M Lopes; Veronica Gomes; Angel Carracedo; Antonio Amorim
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 4.  Recombination in viruses: mechanisms, methods of study, and evolutionary consequences.

Authors:  Marcos Pérez-Losada; Miguel Arenas; Juan Carlos Galán; Ferran Palero; Fernando González-Candelas
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.342

5.  Horizontal gene transfer and recombination analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genes helps discover its close relatives and shed light on its origin.

Authors:  Vladimir Makarenkov; Bogdan Mazoure; Guillaume Rabusseau; Pierre Legendre
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-01-21

6.  A Deep-Learning Approach for Inference of Selective Sweeps from the Ancestral Recombination Graph.

Authors:  Hussein A Hejase; Ziyi Mo; Leonardo Campagna; Adam Siepel
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Bayesian inference of ancestral recombination graphs.

Authors:  Ali Mahmoudi; Jere Koskela; Jerome Kelleher; Yao-Ban Chan; David Balding
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 8.  Selecting among Alternative Scenarios of Human Evolution by Simulated Genetic Gradients.

Authors:  Catarina Branco; Miguel Arenas
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 4.096

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.