Literature DB >> 24133209

The E295K cancer variant of human polymerase β favors the mismatch conformational pathway during nucleotide selection.

Brian E Eckenroth1, Jamie B Towle-Weicksel, Joann B Sweasy, Sylvie Doublié.   

Abstract

DNA polymerase β (pol β) is responsible for gap filling synthesis during repair of damaged DNA as part of the base excision repair pathway. Human pol β mutations were recently identified in a high percentage (∼30%) of tumors. Characterization of specific cancer variants is particularly useful to further the understanding of the general mechanism of pol β while providing context to disease contribution. We showed that expression of the carcinoma variant E295K induces cellular transformation. The poor polymerase activity exhibited by the variant was hypothesized to be caused by the destabilization of proper active site assembly by the glutamate to lysine mutation. Here, we show that this variant exhibits an unusual preference for binding dCTP opposite a templating adenine over the cognate dTTP. Biochemical studies indicate that the noncognate competes with the cognate nucleotide for binding to the polymerase active site with the noncognate incorporation a function of higher affinity and not increased activity. In the crystal structure of the variant bound to dA:dCTP, the fingers domain closes around the mismatched base pair. Nucleotide incorporation is hindered because key residues in the polymerase active site are not properly positioned for nucleotidyl transfer. In contrast to the noncognate dCTP, neither the cognate dTTP nor its nonhydrolyzable analog induced fingers closure, as isomorphous difference Fourier maps show that the cognate nucleotides are bound to the open state of the polymerase. Comparison with published structures provides insight into the structural rearrangements within pol β that occur during the process of nucleotide discrimination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crystallography; DNA Polymerase; DNA Repair; Mutagenesis; Protein Conformation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24133209      PMCID: PMC3843097          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M113.510891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  56 in total

Review 1.  An open and closed case for all polymerases.

Authors:  S Doublié; M R Sawaya; T Ellenberger
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  Loss of DNA polymerase beta stacking interactions with templating purines, but not pyrimidines, alters catalytic efficiency and fidelity.

Authors:  William A Beard; David D Shock; Xiao-Ping Yang; Saundra F DeLauder; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-12-26       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  A reexamination of the nucleotide incorporation fidelity of DNA polymerases.

Authors:  Alexander K Showalter; Ming-Daw Tsai
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2002-08-27       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Functional mutation of DNA polymerase beta found in human gastric cancer--inability of the base excision repair in vitro.

Authors:  A Iwanaga; M Ouchida; K Miyazaki; K Hori; T Mukai
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1999-10-22       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Minor groove interactions at the DNA polymerase beta active site modulate single-base deletion error rates.

Authors:  W P Osheroff; W A Beard; S Yin; S H Wilson; T A Kunkel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-09-08       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Polymerase beta simulations suggest that Arg258 rotation is a slow step rather than large subdomain motions per se.

Authors:  Linjing Yang; William A Beard; Samuel H Wilson; Suse Broyde; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-04-12       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  DNA polymerase beta: contributions of template-positioning and dNTP triphosphate-binding residues to catalysis and fidelity.

Authors:  V S Kraynov; A K Showalter; J Liu; X Zhong; M D Tsai
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-12-26       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Local deformations revealed by dynamics simulations of DNA polymerase Beta with DNA mismatches at the primer terminus.

Authors:  Linjing Yang; William Beard; Samuel Wilson; Benoit Roux; Suse Broyde; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-08-16       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Use of 2-aminopurine and tryptophan fluorescence as probes in kinetic analyses of DNA polymerase beta.

Authors:  Christopher A Dunlap; Ming-Daw Tsai
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Maximum-likelihood density modification.

Authors:  T C Terwilliger
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2000-08
View more
  13 in total

1.  Remote Mutations Induce Functional Changes in Active Site Residues of Human DNA Polymerase β.

Authors:  Brian E Eckenroth; Jamie B Towle-Weicksel; Antonia A Nemec; Drew L Murphy; Joann B Sweasy; Sylvie Doublié
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies of DNA polymerase β: the critical role of fingers domain movements and a novel non-covalent step during nucleotide selection.

Authors:  Jamie B Towle-Weicksel; Shibani Dalal; Christal D Sohl; Sylvie Doublié; Karen S Anderson; Joann B Sweasy
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  New structural snapshots provide molecular insights into the mechanism of high fidelity DNA synthesis.

Authors:  Bret D Freudenthal; William A Beard; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2015-04-30

Review 4.  Base excision repair: a critical player in many games.

Authors:  Susan S Wallace
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-04-26

5.  Substrate-induced DNA polymerase β activation.

Authors:  William A Beard; David D Shock; Vinod K Batra; Rajendra Prasad; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Defective Nucleotide Release by DNA Polymerase β Mutator Variant E288K Is the Basis of Its Low Fidelity.

Authors:  Mariam M Mahmoud; Allison Schechter; Khadijeh S Alnajjar; Ji Huang; Jamie Towle-Weicksel; Brian E Eckenroth; Sylvie Doublié; Joann B Sweasy
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Single molecule glycosylase studies with engineered 8-oxoguanine DNA damage sites show functional defects of a MUTYH polyposis variant.

Authors:  Shane R Nelson; Scott D Kathe; Thomas S Hilzinger; April M Averill; David M Warshaw; Susan S Wallace; Andrea J Lee
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  A Change in the Rate-Determining Step of Polymerization by the K289M DNA Polymerase β Cancer-Associated Variant.

Authors:  Khadijeh S Alnajjar; Beatriz Garcia-Barboza; Amirsoheil Negahbani; Maryam Nakhjiri; Boris Kashemirov; Charles McKenna; Myron F Goodman; Joann B Sweasy
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  DNA Polymerase β Cancer-Associated Variant I260M Exhibits Nonspecific Selectivity toward the β-γ Bridging Group of the Incoming dNTP.

Authors:  Khadijeh S Alnajjar; Amirsoheil Negahbani; Maryam Nakhjiri; Ivan S Krylov; Boris A Kashemirov; Charles E McKenna; Myron F Goodman; Joann B Sweasy
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Induced Fit in the Selection of Correct versus Incorrect Nucleotides by DNA Polymerase β.

Authors:  Beth Moscato; Monalisa Swain; J Patrick Loria
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.