Literature DB >> 24132806

Inexpensive video-laryngoscopy guided intubation using a personal computer: initial experience of a novel technique.

John George Karippacheril1, Goneppanavar Umesh, Venkateswaran Ramkumar.   

Abstract

Video-laryngoscopy may provide an enhanced view of laryngeal structures compared to direct visualization. Commercial video-laryngoscopes are often expensive, limiting its adoption for routine use. We describe our initial experience using an inexpensive custom made device. Patients >15 years age, were randomly chosen, after informed consent, for video-laryngoscopy. A custom device easily assembled using an USB endoscopic camera, a conventional Macintosh laryngoscope blade size 3 or 4, and a personal computer was used. Patients with Mallampati class 1-3 were chosen. Video-laryngoscopy was recorded and reviewed. Twenty-four patients aged 16-68 years, of mean weight 58.46 ± 12.54 (40-86) kg were studied. The glottis could be visualized and intubation could be performed in all patients with 22/24 patients on first attempt. Mean duration of laryngoscopy was 22.17 ± 12.78 (7-59) s. Time taken for intubation, was mean of 28.58 ± 21.01 (9-89) s. Three patients with anticipated difficult airways could be intubated on the first attempt. Minor blood staining of the airway was seen in the video in two patients. Cormack-Lehane laryngoscopy grade visualized was 1 in 9/24, 2 in 15/24 patients. Percentage of glottic opening score was 62.29 ± 28.40 (20-100) %. Real-time video could be captured in all cases. The custom-made, inexpensive, video-laryngoscopy device is safe and reliable for clinical use. Real-time visualization and endotracheal intubation were successful in all patients, including those with anticipated difficult airway. Further, this device helps in archiving the video of intubation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24132806     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-013-9522-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  11 in total

1.  Assessment of laryngeal view: percentage of glottic opening score vs Cormack and Lehane grading.

Authors:  E A Ochroch; J E Hollander; S Kush; F S Shofer; R M Levitan
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  First clinical evaluation of the C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope during routine and difficult intubation.

Authors:  Erol Cavus; Tobias Neumann; Volker Doerges; Thora Moeller; Edwin Scharf; Klaus Wagner; Berthold Bein; Goetz Serocki
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 3.  Video-laryngoscopes in the adult airway management: a topical review of the literature.

Authors:  P Niforopoulou; I Pantazopoulos; T Demestiha; E Koudouna; T Xanthos
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 2.105

4.  Laryngeal view during laryngoscopy: a randomized trial comparing cricoid pressure, backward-upward-rightward pressure, and bimanual laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Richard M Levitan; William C Kinkle; William J Levin; Worth W Everett
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 5.721

5.  Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope.

Authors:  Götz Serocki; Berthold Bein; Jens Scholz; Volker Dörges
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Difficult airway management in the emergency department: GlideScope videolaryngoscopy compared to direct laryngoscopy.

Authors:  Jarrod M Mosier; Uwe Stolz; Stephen Chiu; John C Sakles
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 1.484

7.  Assessment and confirmation of tracheal intubation when capnography fails: a novel use for an USB camera.

Authors:  John George Karippacheril; Goneppanavar Umesh; Shetty Nanda
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  A videographic analysis of laryngeal exposure comparing the articulating laryngoscope and external laryngeal manipulation.

Authors:  E A Ochroch; R M Levitan
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.

Authors:  André van Zundert; Ralph Maassen; Ruben Lee; Remi Willems; Michel Timmerman; Marc Siemonsma; Marc Buise; Marco Wiepking
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 10.  Glidescope® video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Donald E G Griesdale; David Liu; James McKinney; Peter T Choi
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 5.063

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Journal of clinical monitoring and computing 2014 end of year summary: respiration.

Authors:  D S Karbing; S E Rees; M B Jaffe
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Videolaryngoscopy using an Android smartphone: A direct digital technique.

Authors:  John George Karippacheril; Minh Le Cong
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-02

3.  Comparison of VividTrac®, Airtraq®, King Vision®, Macintosh Laryngoscope and a Custom-Made Videolaryngoscope for difficult and normal airways in mannequins by novices.

Authors:  Szilárd Rendeki; Dóra Keresztes; Gábor Woth; Ákos Mérei; Martin Rozanovic; Mátyás Rendeki; József Farkas; Diána Mühl; Bálint Nagy
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Performance of custom made videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Pawan Kumar Hamal; Rupesh Kumar Yadav; Pragya Malla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Digitizing the direct laryngoscopy experience: the economic way!!

Authors:  Neha Hasija; Suniti Kale; Kiran Kumar Girdhar
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-05-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.