Ellen Wiebe1. 1. 1013-750 W Broadway, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1H9. ellenwiebe@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare experiences, attitudes, and beliefs of immigrant and nonimmigrant women presenting for abortion with regard to contraception, and to identify difficulties involved in accessing contraception in Canada. DESIGN: A survey of immigrant and nonimmigrant women asking about women's experiences with and attitudes toward contraceptives and any barriers to contraceptive access they have encountered. Demographic data including ethnicity, country of origin, and length of residence in Canada were collected. SETTING: Two urban abortion clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Women presenting for first-trimester abortion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Type of contraception used when the unwanted pregnancy was conceived, attitudes to contraceptives, and barriers to access of contraceptives. RESULTS: A total of 999 women completed questionnaires during the study period (75.9% response rate); 466 of them (46.6%) were born in Canada. Immigrant women presenting for abortion were less likely to be using hormonal contraception when they got pregnant (12.5% vs 23.5%, P < .001) and had more negative attitudes toward hormonal contraception (62.6% vs 51.6%, P < .003). They reported having more difficulties accessing contraception before the abortion (24.8% vs 15.3%, P < .001) than nonimmigrant women did. About half of all the women expressed fear about intrauterine device use. The longer immigrant women had lived in Canada, the more likely they were to have similar responses to those of Canadian-born women. CONCLUSION: The information provided by this study might be valuable for family doctors and other clinicians to improve contraceptive information resources for immigrants to address existing knowledge gaps and other culturally relevant concerns. As about half of all women presenting for abortion expressed negative attitudes toward the more effective methods of contraception, it is important that family doctors educate all women at risk for unintended pregnancies.
OBJECTIVE: To compare experiences, attitudes, and beliefs of immigrant and nonimmigrant women presenting for abortion with regard to contraception, and to identify difficulties involved in accessing contraception in Canada. DESIGN: A survey of immigrant and nonimmigrant women asking about women's experiences with and attitudes toward contraceptives and any barriers to contraceptive access they have encountered. Demographic data including ethnicity, country of origin, and length of residence in Canada were collected. SETTING: Two urban abortion clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Women presenting for first-trimester abortion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Type of contraception used when the unwanted pregnancy was conceived, attitudes to contraceptives, and barriers to access of contraceptives. RESULTS: A total of 999 women completed questionnaires during the study period (75.9% response rate); 466 of them (46.6%) were born in Canada. Immigrant women presenting for abortion were less likely to be using hormonal contraception when they got pregnant (12.5% vs 23.5%, P < .001) and had more negative attitudes toward hormonal contraception (62.6% vs 51.6%, P < .003). They reported having more difficulties accessing contraception before the abortion (24.8% vs 15.3%, P < .001) than nonimmigrant women did. About half of all the women expressed fear about intrauterine device use. The longer immigrant women had lived in Canada, the more likely they were to have similar responses to those of Canadian-born women. CONCLUSION: The information provided by this study might be valuable for family doctors and other clinicians to improve contraceptive information resources for immigrants to address existing knowledge gaps and other culturally relevant concerns. As about half of all women presenting for abortion expressed negative attitudes toward the more effective methods of contraception, it is important that family doctors educate all women at risk for unintended pregnancies.