Thomas W LeBlanc1, Jordan E Lodato, David C Currow, Amy P Abernethy. 1. Duke University Medical Center; Duke Cancer Institute; Center for Learning Health Care, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC; and Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Palliative care is increasingly viewed as a necessary component of cancer care, especially for patients with advanced disease. Rigorous clinical trials are thus needed to build the palliative care evidence base, but clinical research-especially participant recruitment-is difficult. Major barriers include (1) patient factors, (2) "gatekeeping," and (3) ethical concerns. Here we discuss an approach to overcoming these barriers, using the Palliative Care Trial (PCT) as a case study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The PCT was a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial (RCT) of different service delivery models to improve pain control in the palliative setting. It used a recruitment protocol that fused evidence-based strategies with principles of "social marketing," an approach involving the systematic application of marketing techniques. Main components included (1) an inclusive triage algorithm, (2) information booklets targeting particular stakeholders, (3) a specialized recruitment nurse, and (4) standardization of wording across all study communications. RESULTS:From an eligible pool of 607 patients, the PCT enrolled 461 patients over 26 months. Twenty percent of patients referred to the palliative care service were enrolled (76% of those eligible after screening). Several common barriers were minimized; among those who declined participation, family disinterest was uncommon (5%), as was the perception of burden imposed (4%). CONCLUSION: Challenges to clinical trial recruitment in palliative care are significant but not insurmountable. A carefully crafted recruitment and retention protocol can be effective. Our experience with designing and deploying a social-marketing-based protocol shows the benefits of such an approach.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Palliative care is increasingly viewed as a necessary component of cancer care, especially for patients with advanced disease. Rigorous clinical trials are thus needed to build the palliative care evidence base, but clinical research-especially participant recruitment-is difficult. Major barriers include (1) patient factors, (2) "gatekeeping," and (3) ethical concerns. Here we discuss an approach to overcoming these barriers, using the Palliative Care Trial (PCT) as a case study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The PCT was a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial (RCT) of different service delivery models to improve pain control in the palliative setting. It used a recruitment protocol that fused evidence-based strategies with principles of "social marketing," an approach involving the systematic application of marketing techniques. Main components included (1) an inclusive triage algorithm, (2) information booklets targeting particular stakeholders, (3) a specialized recruitment nurse, and (4) standardization of wording across all study communications. RESULTS: From an eligible pool of 607 patients, the PCT enrolled 461 patients over 26 months. Twenty percent of patients referred to the palliative care service were enrolled (76% of those eligible after screening). Several common barriers were minimized; among those who declined participation, family disinterest was uncommon (5%), as was the perception of burden imposed (4%). CONCLUSION: Challenges to clinical trial recruitment in palliative care are significant but not insurmountable. A carefully crafted recruitment and retention protocol can be effective. Our experience with designing and deploying a social-marketing-based protocol shows the benefits of such an approach.
Authors: Amy P Abernethy; David C Currow; Tania Shelby-James; Debra Rowett; Frank May; Gregory P Samsa; Roger Hunt; Helena Williams; Adrian Esterman; Paddy A Phillips Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2012-10-24 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Laura C Hanson; Janet Bull; Kathryn Wessell; Lisa Massie; Rachael E Bennett; Jean S Kutner; Noreen M Aziz; Amy Abernethy Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Gareth J Watts; Katherine Clark; Meera Agar; Patricia M Davidson; Christine McDonald; Lawrence T Lam; Dimitar Sajkov; Nicola McCaffrey; Matthew Doogue; Amy P Abernethy; David C Currow Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Jayita Kedar Deodhar; Vanita Noronha; Mary Ann Muckaden; Shrikant Atreya; Amit Joshi; Sandeep P Tandon; Arunangshu Ghoshal; Naveen S Salins; Vijay M Patil; Kumar Prabhash Journal: Indian J Palliat Care Date: 2017 Jul-Sep
Authors: Ramy Sedhom; Richard Nudotor; Karen M Freund; Thomas J Smith; Lisa A Cooper; Jill T Owczarzak; Fabian M Johnston Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2021-01-21
Authors: Anne M Finucane; Emma Carduff; Jean Lugton; Stephen Fenning; Bridget Johnston; Marie Fallon; David Clark; Juliet A Spiller; Scott A Murray Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2018-01-26 Impact factor: 3.234