OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Effective treatments for hollow organ stenosis, scarring, or agenesis are suboptimal or lacking. Tissue-engineered implants may provide a solution, but those performed to date are limited by poor mucosalization after transplantation. We aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature on tissue-engineered airway mucosa. Our objectives were to assess the success of this technology and its potential application to airway regenerative medicine and to determine the direction of future research to maximize its therapeutic and commercial potential. DATA SOURCES AND REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed searching Medline (January 1996) and Embase (January 1980) using search terms "tissue engineering" or "tissue" and "engineering" or "tissue engineered" and "mucous membrane" or "mucous" and "membrane" or "mucosa." Original studies utilizing tissue engineering to regenerate airway mucosa within the trachea or the main bronchi in animal models or human studies were included. RESULTS: A total of 719 papers matched the search criteria, with 17 fulfilling the entry criteria. Of these 17, four investigated mucosal engineering in humans, with the remaining 13 studies investigating mucosal engineering in animal models. The review demonstrated how an intact mucosal layer protects against infection and suggests a role for fibroblasts in facilitating epithelial regeneration in vitro. A range of scaffold materials were used, but no single material was clearly superior to the others. CONCLUSION: The review highlights gaps in the literature and recommends key directions for future research such as epithelial tracking and the role of the extracellular environment.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Effective treatments for hollow organ stenosis, scarring, or agenesis are suboptimal or lacking. Tissue-engineered implants may provide a solution, but those performed to date are limited by poor mucosalization after transplantation. We aimed to perform a systematic review of the literature on tissue-engineered airway mucosa. Our objectives were to assess the success of this technology and its potential application to airway regenerative medicine and to determine the direction of future research to maximize its therapeutic and commercial potential. DATA SOURCES AND REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed searching Medline (January 1996) and Embase (January 1980) using search terms "tissue engineering" or "tissue" and "engineering" or "tissue engineered" and "mucous membrane" or "mucous" and "membrane" or "mucosa." Original studies utilizing tissue engineering to regenerate airway mucosa within the trachea or the main bronchi in animal models or human studies were included. RESULTS: A total of 719 papers matched the search criteria, with 17 fulfilling the entry criteria. Of these 17, four investigated mucosal engineering in humans, with the remaining 13 studies investigating mucosal engineering in animal models. The review demonstrated how an intact mucosal layer protects against infection and suggests a role for fibroblasts in facilitating epithelial regeneration in vitro. A range of scaffold materials were used, but no single material was clearly superior to the others. CONCLUSION: The review highlights gaps in the literature and recommends key directions for future research such as epithelial tracking and the role of the extracellular environment.
Authors: Daniel J Weiss; Daniel Chambers; Adam Giangreco; Armand Keating; Darrell Kotton; Peter I Lelkes; Darcy E Wagner; Darwin J Prockop Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2015-04
Authors: Colin R Butler; Robert E Hynds; Claire Crowley; Kate H C Gowers; Leanne Partington; Nicholas J Hamilton; Carla Carvalho; Manuela Platé; Edward R Samuel; Alan J Burns; Luca Urbani; Martin A Birchall; Mark W Lowdell; Paolo De Coppi; Sam M Janes Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2017-02-05 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Martin J Elliott; Colin R Butler; Aikaterini Varanou-Jenkins; Leanne Partington; Carla Carvalho; Edward Samuel; Claire Crowley; Peggy Lange; Nicholas J Hamilton; Robert E Hynds; Tahera Ansari; Paul Sibbons; Anja Fierens; Claire McLaren; Derek Roebuck; Colin Wallis; Nagarajan Muthialu; Richard Hewitt; David Crabbe; Sam M Janes; Paolo De Coppi; Mark W Lowdell; Martin A Birchall Journal: Stem Cells Transl Med Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 6.940
Authors: Colin R Butler; Robert E Hynds; Kate H C Gowers; Dani Do Hyang Lee; James M Brown; Claire Crowley; Vitor H Teixeira; Claire M Smith; Luca Urbani; Nicholas J Hamilton; Ricky M Thakrar; Helen L Booth; Martin A Birchall; Paolo De Coppi; Adam Giangreco; Christopher O'Callaghan; Sam M Janes Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Claire Crowley; Poramate Klanrit; Colin R Butler; Aikaterini Varanou; Manuela Platé; Robert E Hynds; Rachel C Chambers; Alexander M Seifalian; Martin A Birchall; Sam M Janes Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Robert E Hynds; Kate H C Gowers; Ersilia Nigro; Colin R Butler; Paola Bonfanti; Adam Giangreco; Cecilia M Prêle; Sam M Janes Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 3.240