Literature DB >> 24129010

Lipreading in school-age children: the roles of age, hearing status, and cognitive ability.

Nancy Tye-Murray, Sandra Hale, Brent Spehar, Joel Myerson, Mitchell S Sommers.   

Abstract

PURPOSE The study addressed three research questions: Does lipreading improve between the ages of 7 and 14 years? Does hearing loss affect the development of lipreading? How do individual differences in lipreading relate to other abilities? METHOD Forty children with normal hearing (NH) and 24 with hearing loss (HL) were tested using 4 lipreading instruments plus measures of perceptual, cognitive, and linguistic abilities. RESULTS For both groups, lipreading performance improved with age on all 4 measures of lipreading, with the HL group performing better than the NH group. Scores from the 4 measures loaded strongly on a single principal component. Only age, hearing status, and visuospatial working memory were significant predictors of lipreading performance. CONCLUSIONS Results showed that children's lipreading ability is not fixed but rather improves between 7 and 14 years of age. The finding that children with HL lipread better than those with NH suggests experience plays an important role in the development of this ability. In addition to age and hearing status, visuospatial working memory predicts lipreading performance in children, just as it does in adults. Future research on the developmental time-course of lipreading could permit interventions and pedagogies to be targeted at periods in which improvement is most likely to occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24129010      PMCID: PMC5736322          DOI: 10.1044/2013_JSLHR-H-12-0273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  25 in total

1.  Stimulus-based lexical distinctiveness as a general word-recognition mechanism.

Authors:  Sven L Mattys; Lynne E Bernstein; Edward T Auer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-05

2.  Age-related changes on a children's test of sensory-level speech perception capacity.

Authors:  T E Hnath-Chisolm; E Laipply; A Boothroyd
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  An exploration of why preschoolers perform differently than do adults in audiovisual speech perception tasks.

Authors:  R N Desjardins; J Rogers; J F Werker
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1997-07

4.  Intermodal timing relations and audio-visual speech recognition by normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  M McGrath; Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Speech perception in normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Q Summerfield
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.291

6.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children.

Authors:  J Bench; A Kowal; J Bamford
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1979-08

7.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08

Review 8.  Working-memory capacity and phonological processing in deafened adults and individuals with a severe hearing impairment.

Authors:  Björn Lyxell; Ulf Andersson; Erik Borg; Inga-Stina Ohlsson
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Audiovisual integration and lipreading abilities of older adults with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Mitchell S Sommers; Brent Spehar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Role of visual speech in phonological processing by children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Susan Jerger; Nancy Tye-Murray; Hervé Abdi
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  15 in total

1.  Effects of Context Type on Lipreading and Listening Performance and Implications for Sentence Processing.

Authors:  Brent Spehar; Stacey Goebel; Nancy Tye-Murray
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Electrophysiological evidence for a self-processing advantage during audiovisual speech integration.

Authors:  Avril Treille; Coriandre Vilain; Sonia Kandel; Marc Sato
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Audiovisual Enhancement of Speech Perception in Noise by School-Age Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.

Authors:  Kaylah Lalonde; Ryan W McCreery
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Audiovisual integration for speech during mid-childhood: electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Natalya Kaganovich; Jennifer Schumaker
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Shared and modality-specific brain regions that mediate auditory and visual word comprehension.

Authors:  Anne Keitel; Joachim Gross; Christoph Kayser
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Hearing Status Affects Children's Emotion Understanding in Dynamic Social Situations: An Eye-Tracking Study.

Authors:  Yung-Ting Tsou; Boya Li; Mariska E Kret; Johan H M Frijns; Carolien Rieffe
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  Multisensory training can promote or impede visual perceptual learning of speech stimuli: visual-tactile vs. visual-auditory training.

Authors:  Silvio P Eberhardt; Edward T Auer; Lynne E Bernstein
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  Neural pathways for visual speech perception.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Einat Liebenthal
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Teaching Children With Hearing Loss to Recognize Speech: Gains Made With Computer-Based Auditory and/or Speechreading Training.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Brent Spehar; Mitchell Sommers; Elizabeth Mauzé; Joe Barcroft; Heather Grantham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Visual speech discrimination and identification of natural and synthetic consonant stimuli.

Authors:  Benjamin T Files; Bosco S Tjan; Jintao Jiang; Lynne E Bernstein
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.