INTRODUCTION: Adequate tumor acquisition is essential to identify somatic molecular alterations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocations. The success and failure rates for tumor genotyping of tissue obtained from fine-needle aspirates of nodal tissue using a convex probe endobronchial ultrasound (CP-EBUS) and other diagnostic modalities in routine NSCLC care have not been described. METHODS: Clinicopathologic data, tumor genotype success and failure rates were retrospectively compiled and analyzed from 207 patient-tumor samples sent for routine tumor genotype in clinical practice, including 42 patient-tumor samples obtained from hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes using CP-EBUS. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 65 years, 62.3% were women, 77.8% were white, 26.6% were never smokers, 73.9% had advanced NSCLC, and 84.1% had adenocarcinoma histology. Tumor tissue was obtained from CP-EBUS-derived hilar or mediastinal nodes in 42 cases (20.2% of total). In this latter cohort, the overall success rate for EGFR mutation analysis was 95.2%, for Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutation 90.5%, and for ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization 90.5%. In the complete 207 tumors, the success rate for EGFR was 92.3%, for KRAS 91.8%, and for ALK 89.9%. The failure rates were not significantly different when comparing CP-EBUS-derived nodal tissue versus all other samples or versus surgical biopsies of mediastinal nodes, but were significantly lower than image-guided percutaneous transthoracic core-needle biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: The success rate of multiple tumor genomic analyses techniques for EGFR, KRAS, and ALK gene abnormalities using routine lung cancer tissue samples obtained from hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes by means of CP-EBUS exceeds 90%, and this method of tissue acquisition is not inferior to other specimen types. Tumor genotype techniques are feasible in most CP-EBUS-derived samples and therefore further expansion of routine tumor genotype for the care of patients with NSCLC may be possible using targeted sample acquisition through CP-EBUS.
INTRODUCTION: Adequate tumor acquisition is essential to identify somatic molecular alterations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocations. The success and failure rates for tumor genotyping of tissue obtained from fine-needle aspirates of nodal tissue using a convex probe endobronchial ultrasound (CP-EBUS) and other diagnostic modalities in routine NSCLC care have not been described. METHODS: Clinicopathologic data, tumor genotype success and failure rates were retrospectively compiled and analyzed from 207 patient-tumor samples sent for routine tumor genotype in clinical practice, including 42 patient-tumor samples obtained from hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes using CP-EBUS. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 65 years, 62.3% were women, 77.8% were white, 26.6% were never smokers, 73.9% had advanced NSCLC, and 84.1% had adenocarcinoma histology. Tumor tissue was obtained from CP-EBUS-derived hilar or mediastinal nodes in 42 cases (20.2% of total). In this latter cohort, the overall success rate for EGFR mutation analysis was 95.2%, for Kirsten ratsarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutation 90.5%, and for ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization 90.5%. In the complete 207 tumors, the success rate for EGFR was 92.3%, for KRAS 91.8%, and for ALK 89.9%. The failure rates were not significantly different when comparing CP-EBUS-derived nodal tissue versus all other samples or versus surgical biopsies of mediastinal nodes, but were significantly lower than image-guided percutaneous transthoracic core-needle biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: The success rate of multiple tumor genomic analyses techniques for EGFR, KRAS, and ALK gene abnormalities using routine lung cancer tissue samples obtained from hilar or mediastinal lymph nodes by means of CP-EBUS exceeds 90%, and this method of tissue acquisition is not inferior to other specimen types. Tumor genotype techniques are feasible in most CP-EBUS-derived samples and therefore further expansion of routine tumor genotype for the care of patients with NSCLC may be possible using targeted sample acquisition through CP-EBUS.
Authors: Olga C J Schuurbiers; Monika G Looijen-Salamon; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Henricus F M van der Heijden Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Alda L Tam; Edward S Kim; J Jack Lee; Joe E Ensor; Marshall E Hicks; Ximing Tang; George R Blumenschein; Christine M Alden; Jeremy J Erasmus; Anne Tsao; Scott M Lippman; Waun K Hong; Ignacio I Wistuba; Sanjay Gupta Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Felix J F Herth; Jouke T Annema; Ralf Eberhardt; Kazuhiro Yasufuku; Armin Ernst; Mark Krasnik; Robert C Rintoul Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Neal Navani; James M Brown; Matthew Nankivell; Ian Woolhouse; Richard N Harrison; Vandana Jeebun; Mohammed Munavvar; Benjamin J Ng; Doris M Rassl; Mary Falzon; Gabrijela Kocjan; Robert C Rintoul; Andrew G Nicholson; Sam M Janes Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-04-13 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Ronald van Eijk; Jappe Licht; Melanie Schrumpf; Mehrdad Talebian Yazdi; Dina Ruano; Giusi I Forte; Petra M Nederlof; Maud Veselic; Klaus F Rabe; Jouke T Annema; Vincent Smit; Hans Morreau; Tom van Wezel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-03-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: George Santis; Roger Angell; Guillermina Nickless; Alison Quinn; Amanda Herbert; Paul Cane; James Spicer; Ronan Breen; Emma McLean; Khalid Tobal Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-09-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Laura Millares; Mireia Serra; Felipe Andreo; Jose Sanz-Santos; Concepción Montón; Carles Grimau; Miguel Gallego; Laia Setó; Neus Combalia; Mariona Llatjos; Rosa Escoda; Eva Castellà; Eduard Monsó Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2015-06-29 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: Christopher J Manley; Rohit Kumar; Yulan Gong; Min Huang; Shuanzeng Sam Wei; Rajeswari Nagarathinam; Alan Haber; Brian Egleston; Douglas Flieder; Hormoz Ehya Journal: J Am Soc Cytopathol Date: 2021-10-23
Authors: Antonio R Lucena-Araujo; Jason P Moran; Paul A VanderLaan; Dora Dias-Santagata; Erik Folch; Adnan Majid; Michael S Kent; Sidharta P Gangadharan; Deepa Rangachari; Mark S Huberman; Susumu S Kobayashi; Daniel B Costa Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Nikhil Jagan; Carolina A Landeen; Douglas R Moore; Adam D Highley; Ryan W Walters; Zachary S DePew Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Maria-Rosa Ghigna; Adrian Crutu; Valentina Florea; Séverine Feuillet-Soummer; Pierre Baldeyrou; Julien Adam; Ludovic Lacroix; Benjamin Besse; Olaf Mercier; Elie Fadel; Peter Dorfmuller; Rida El Ayoubi; Vincent Thomas de Montpréville Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Vanda F Torous; Deepa Rangachari; Benjamin P Gallant; Meghan Shea; Daniel B Costa; Paul A VanderLaan Journal: J Am Soc Cytopathol Date: 2018-02-16