Literature DB >> 20871266

A brief retrospective report on the feasibility of epidermal growth factor receptor and KRAS mutation analysis in transesophageal ultrasound- and endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine needle cytological aspirates.

Olga C J Schuurbiers1, Monika G Looijen-Salamon, Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg, Henricus F M van der Heijden.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Molecular testing for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and KRAS mutations is of increasing clinical importance in daily practice. In this study, we aimed to investigate the yield and applicability of molecular testing for KRAS and EGFR mutations in cytologic specimens obtained by EUS or endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA).
METHODS: We selected all patients with an EUS- or EBUS-guided FNA positive for lung adenocarcinoma from the database of our tertiary care center for endosonography. Direct smears were Giemsa and Papanicolaou stained. The remaining material was processed in cell blocks. Both cell blocks and smears were considered suitable for molecular analysis when >40% of the aspirated cells were tumor cells. All eligible samples were investigated for KRAS and EGFR mutations by polymerase chain reaction followed by direct sequencing.
RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-two patients underwent EUS or EBUS-FNA using 22-gauge needles. In 35 patients, FNA showed lung adenocarcinoma. In eight patients, molecular analysis could not be performed because of insufficient material after routine and immunocytochemistry (n = 3), a low percentage (<40%) of tumor cells (n = 3), or an insufficient DNA quality (n = 2). The average percentage of tumor cells was 73% ± 23%. Molecular analysis could reliably be performed in 27 patients (77%). Mutation analysis showed KRAS and EGFR mutations in tumor samples from 10 (37%) and two (7%) patients, respectively. In one patient, two EGFR mutations (p.Thr790Met and p.Leu858Arg) were detected.
CONCLUSIONS: Molecular analysis for KRAS and EGFR mutations can be performed routinely in cytologic specimens from EUS- and EBUS-guided FNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20871266     DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181f0bd93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  32 in total

Review 1.  Acquisition and processing of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens in the era of targeted lung cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  William Bulman; Anjali Saqi; Charles A Powell
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  The importance of a satisfactory biopsy for the diagnosis of lung cancer in the era of personalized treatment.

Authors:  L M Ofiara; A Navasakulpong; N Ezer; A V Gonzalez
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Adequacy of lymph node transbronchial needle aspirates using convex probe endobronchial ultrasound for multiple tumor genotyping techniques in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Erik Folch; Norihiro Yamaguchi; Paul A VanderLaan; Olivier N Kocher; David H Boucher; Michael A Goldstein; Mark S Huberman; Michael S Kent; Sidharta P Gangadharan; Daniel B Costa; Adnan Majid
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 4.  Current status and perspective of EBUS-TBNA.

Authors:  Takahiro Nakajima; Kazuhiro Yasufuku; Ichiro Yoshino
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-02-26

5.  Molecular profiling of thin-prep FNA samples in assisting clinical management of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Daniela Petriella; Domenico Galetta; Vincenza Rubini; Eufemia Savino; Angelo Paradiso; Giovanni Simone; Stefania Tommasi
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.695

6.  Cell block samples from endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration provide sufficient material for ancillary testing in lung cancer-a quaternary referral centre experience.

Authors:  Emily Hopkins; David Moffat; Ian Parkinson; Peter Robinson; Hubertus Jersmann; Brendan Dougherty; Mohammed I Birader; Kate Francis; Phan Nguyen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Adequacy of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration samples processed as histopathological samples for genetic mutation analysis in lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Abiramy Jeyabalan; Nidhi Bhatt; Martin J Plummeridge; Andrew R L Medford
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-09

8.  Screening for EGFR and KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung carcinomas using DNA extraction by hydrothermal pressure coupled with PCR-based direct sequencing.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Bing-Quan Wu; Hao-Hao Zhong; Pei Hui; Wei-Gang Fang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-08-15

9.  Protocol to Improve Genotyping of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Diagnosed Using EBUS-TBNA.

Authors:  Christina R Bellinger; Deepankar Sharma; Travis Dotson; Jimmy Ruiz; Graham Parks; Edward F Haponik
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.954

Review 10.  EGFR mutation testing on cytological and histological samples in non-small cell lung cancer: a Polish, single institution study and systematic review of European incidence.

Authors:  Anna Szumera-Ciećkiewicz; Włodzimierz T Olszewski; Andrzej Tysarowski; Dariusz M Kowalski; Maciej Głogowski; Maciej Krzakowski; Janusz A Siedlecki; Michał Wągrodzki; Monika Prochorec-Sobieszek
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-11-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.