Literature DB >> 24127851

Are prophylactic antibiotics necessary in patients with preoperative sterile urine undergoing ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy?

Cheng-Hsing Hsieh1, Stephen Shei-Dei Yang, Chia-Da Lin, Shang-Jen Chang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in reducing post-surgical infections in patients undergoing ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy (URSL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was a double-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Between 2009 and 2012, 212 patients with preoperative sterile urine undergoing URSL were randomly allocated, in a ratio of 1:1:1:1, to receive prophylactic antibiotics with single-dose i.v. cefazolin (1 g), ceftriaxone (1 g) or oral levofloxacin (500 mg), or no treatment (control group), respectively. Urine analysis and urine cultures were obtained between postoperative days 5 and 7. Pyuria was defined as ≥10 white blood cells/high power field. Significant bacteriuria was defined as ≥100,000 colony-forming units uropathogens/mL. Febrile urinary tract infection (fUTI) was defined as a body temperature of 38.5 °C with pyuria or significant bacteriuria ≤7 days after surgery.
RESULTS: In total, 206 patients were eligible for analysis. The rates of postoperative pyuria were significantly lower in patients with prophylaxis than in the control group (48.4 vs 64.7%, P = 0.04). Patients receiving prophylaxis with levofloxacin and ceftriaxone had a significantly lower risk of pyuria compared with the control group (52.0 and 36.5 vs 64.7%, respectively; P < 0.05). The rates of bacteriuria and fUTI tended to be lower in patients with prophylaxis, although the difference was not significant (4.5 vs 11.8%, P = 0.09, 1.3 vs 5.9%, P = 0.09). There was no significant difference in rates of bacteriuria and fUTI between the four groups. Patients with proximal stones had a higher risk of developing postoperative fUTI (odds ratio 9.35; P = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: Antibiotic prophylaxis significantly reduces the incidence of pyuria after URSL and tends to diminish the risk of bacteriuria and fUTI.
© 2013 The Authors. BJU International © 2013 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antibiotics; infection; prophylaxis; stones; ureteroscopy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24127851     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  4 in total

Review 1.  Antibiotic use and the prevention and management of infectious complications in stone disease.

Authors:  Daniel A Wollin; Adrian D Joyce; Mantu Gupta; Michael Y C Wong; Pilar Laguna; Stavros Gravas; Jorge Gutierrez; Luigi Cormio; Kunjie Wang; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  The stone surgeon in the mirror: how are German-speaking urologists treating large renal stones today?

Authors:  Martin Schoenthaler; Simon Hein; Christian Seitz; Christian Türk; Hansjörg Danuser; Werner Vach; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Comparison of Fragmentation and Dusting Modality Using Holmium YAG Laser during Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of Ureteral Stone: A Single-Center's Experience.

Authors:  Bo-Han Chen; Tsu-Feng Lin; Chih-Chun Tsai; Marcelo Chen; Allen W Chiu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 4.  Antibiotic prophylaxis and its appropriate timing for urological surgical procedures in patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria: A systematic review.

Authors:  Jorge A Ramos; Diego F Salinas; Johanna Osorio; Alberto Ruano-Ravina
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2016-06-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.