Literature DB >> 24126572

Integrating the management of Ruaha landscape of Tanzania with local needs and preferences.

Michel Masozera1, Jon D Erickson, Deana Clifford, Peter Coppolillo, Harrison G Sadiki, Jonna K Mazet.   

Abstract

Sustainable management of landscapes with multiple competing demands such as the Ruaha Landscape is complex due to the diverse preferences and needs of stakeholder groups involved. This study uses conjoint analysis to assess the preferences of representatives from three stakeholder groups-local communities, district government officials, and non-governmental organizations-toward potential solutions of conservation and development tradeoffs facing local communities in the Ruaha Landscape of Tanzania. Results demonstrate that there is little consensus among stakeholders about the best development strategies for the Ruaha region. This analysis suggests a need for incorporating issues deemed important by these various groups into a development strategy that aims to promote conservation of the Ruaha Landscape and improve the livelihood of local communities.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24126572     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013-0175-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  9 in total

1.  Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care.

Authors:  M Ryan; S Farrar
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-03

2.  Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: an application to in vitro fertilisation.

Authors:  M Ryan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 3.  Integrating protected area management with local needs and aspirations.

Authors:  Michael P Wells; Thomas O McShane
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Collaborative environmental planning in river management: an application of multicriteria decision analysis in the White River Watershed in Vermont.

Authors:  Caroline Hermans; Jon Erickson; Tom Noordewier; Amy Sheldon; Mike Kline
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 6.789

5.  Resource use among rural agricultural households near protected areas in Vietnam: the social costs of conservation and implications for enforcement.

Authors:  Pamela D McElwee
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Parks and people: assessing the human welfare effects of establishing protected areas for biodiversity conservation.

Authors:  David S Wilkie; Gilda A Morelli; Josefien Demmer; Malcolm Starkey; Paul Telfer; Matthew Steil
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.560

7.  Parents' preferences for services for children with hearing loss: a conjoint analysis study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Fitzpatrick; Douglas E Coyle; Andrée Durieux-Smith; Ian D Graham; Douglas E Angus; Isabelle Gaboury
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Women and health care professionals' preferences for Down's Syndrome screening tests: a conjoint analysis study.

Authors:  Amanda J Bishop; Theresa M Marteau; David Armstrong; Lyn S Chitty; Louise Longworth; Martin J Buxton; Cheryl Berlin
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Accelerated human population growth at protected area edges.

Authors:  George Wittemyer; Paul Elsen; William T Bean; A Coleman O Burton; Justin S Brashares
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 47.728

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  An adaptive watershed management assessment based on watershed investigation data.

Authors:  Min Goo Kang; Seung Woo Park
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  New perspectives in ecosystem services science as instruments to understand environmental securities.

Authors:  Ferdinando Villa; Brian Voigt; Jon D Erickson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 6.237

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.