BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of children with asthma have delayed diagnosis of asthma by health care providers. Manual chart review according to established criteria is more accurate than directly using diagnosis codes, which tend to under-identify asthmatics, but chart reviews are more costly and less timely. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of a computational approach to asthma ascertainment, characterizing its utility and feasibility toward large-scale deployment in electronic medical records. METHODS: A natural language processing (NLP) system was developed for extracting predetermined criteria for asthma from unstructured text in electronic medical records and then inferring asthma status based on these criteria. Using manual chart reviews as a gold standard, asthma status (yes vs no) and identification date (first date of a "yes" asthma status) were determined by the NLP system. RESULTS: Patients were a group of children (n = 112, 84% Caucasian, 49% girls) younger than 4 years (mean 2.0 years, standard deviation 1.03 years) who participated in previous studies. The NLP approach to asthma ascertainment showed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and median delay in diagnosis of 84.6%, 96.5%, 88.0%, 95.4%, and 0 months, respectively; this compared favorably with diagnosis codes, at 30.8%, 93.2%, 57.1%, 82.2%, and 2.3 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Automated asthma ascertainment from electronic medical records using NLP is feasible and more accurate than traditional approaches such as diagnosis codes. Considering the difficulty of labor-intensive manual record review, NLP approaches for asthma ascertainment should be considered for improving clinical care and research, especially in large-scale efforts.
BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of children with asthma have delayed diagnosis of asthma by health care providers. Manual chart review according to established criteria is more accurate than directly using diagnosis codes, which tend to under-identify asthmatics, but chart reviews are more costly and less timely. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of a computational approach to asthma ascertainment, characterizing its utility and feasibility toward large-scale deployment in electronic medical records. METHODS: A natural language processing (NLP) system was developed for extracting predetermined criteria for asthma from unstructured text in electronic medical records and then inferring asthma status based on these criteria. Using manual chart reviews as a gold standard, asthma status (yes vs no) and identification date (first date of a "yes" asthma status) were determined by the NLP system. RESULTS:Patients were a group of children (n = 112, 84% Caucasian, 49% girls) younger than 4 years (mean 2.0 years, standard deviation 1.03 years) who participated in previous studies. The NLP approach to asthma ascertainment showed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and median delay in diagnosis of 84.6%, 96.5%, 88.0%, 95.4%, and 0 months, respectively; this compared favorably with diagnosis codes, at 30.8%, 93.2%, 57.1%, 82.2%, and 2.3 months, respectively. CONCLUSION:Automated asthma ascertainment from electronic medical records using NLP is feasible and more accurate than traditional approaches such as diagnosis codes. Considering the difficulty of labor-intensive manual record review, NLP approaches for asthma ascertainment should be considered for improving clinical care and research, especially in large-scale efforts.
Authors: M D Silverstein; J W Yunginger; C E Reed; T Petterson; D Zimmerman; J T Li; W M O'Fallon Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: M D Silverstein; C E Reed; E J O'Connell; L J Melton; W M O'Fallon; J W Yunginger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1994-12-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthew F Daley; Jennifer Barrow; Kellyn Pearson; Lori A Crane; Dexiang Gao; John M Stevenson; Stephen Berman; Allison Kempe Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Chung-Il Wi; Sunghwan Sohn; Mary C Rolfes; Alicia Seabright; Euijung Ryu; Gretchen Voge; Kay A Bachman; Miguel A Park; Hirohito Kita; Ivana T Croghan; Hongfang Liu; Young J Juhn Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2017-08-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Zhen Hu; Genevieve B Melton; Nathan D Moeller; Elliot G Arsoniadis; Yan Wang; Mary R Kwaan; Eric H Jensen; Gyorgy J Simon Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2017-02-10
Authors: Prakash Adekkanattu; Evan T Sholle; Joseph DeFerio; Jyotishman Pathak; Stephen B Johnson; Thomas R Campion Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2018-12-05