Emily S Finn1, Xilin Shen2, John M Holahan3, Dustin Scheinost4, Cheryl Lacadie2, Xenophon Papademetris5, Sally E Shaywitz3, Bennett A Shaywitz3, R Todd Constable6. 1. Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: emily.finn@yale.edu. 2. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 3. Yale Center for Dyslexia and Creativity, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. 5. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 6. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Functional connectivity analyses of functional magnetic resonance imaging data are a powerful tool for characterizing brain networks and how they are disrupted in neural disorders. However, many such analyses examine only one or a small number of a priori seed regions. Studies that consider the whole brain frequently rely on anatomic atlases to define network nodes, which might result in mixing distinct activation time-courses within a single node. Here, we improve upon previous methods by using a data-driven brain parcellation to compare connectivity profiles of dyslexic (DYS) versus non-impaired (NI) readers in the first whole-brain functional connectivity analysis of dyslexia. METHODS: Whole-brain connectivity was assessed in children (n = 75; 43 NI, 32 DYS) and adult (n = 104; 64 NI, 40 DYS) readers. RESULTS: Compared to NI readers, DYS readers showed divergent connectivity within the visual pathway and between visual association areas and prefrontal attention areas; increased right-hemisphere connectivity; reduced connectivity in the visual word-form area (part of the left fusiform gyrus specialized for printed words); and persistent connectivity to anterior language regions around the inferior frontal gyrus. CONCLUSIONS: Together, findings suggest that NI readers are better able to integrate visual information and modulate their attention to visual stimuli, allowing them to recognize words on the basis of their visual properties, whereas DYS readers recruit altered reading circuits and rely on laborious phonology-based "sounding out" strategies into adulthood. These results deepen our understanding of the neural basis of dyslexia and highlight the importance of synchrony between diverse brain regions for successful reading.
BACKGROUND: Functional connectivity analyses of functional magnetic resonance imaging data are a powerful tool for characterizing brain networks and how they are disrupted in neural disorders. However, many such analyses examine only one or a small number of a priori seed regions. Studies that consider the whole brain frequently rely on anatomic atlases to define network nodes, which might result in mixing distinct activation time-courses within a single node. Here, we improve upon previous methods by using a data-driven brain parcellation to compare connectivity profiles of dyslexic (DYS) versus non-impaired (NI) readers in the first whole-brain functional connectivity analysis of dyslexia. METHODS: Whole-brain connectivity was assessed in children (n = 75; 43 NI, 32 DYS) and adult (n = 104; 64 NI, 40 DYS) readers. RESULTS: Compared to NI readers, DYS readers showed divergent connectivity within the visual pathway and between visual association areas and prefrontal attention areas; increased right-hemisphere connectivity; reduced connectivity in the visual word-form area (part of the left fusiform gyrus specialized for printed words); and persistent connectivity to anterior language regions around the inferior frontal gyrus. CONCLUSIONS: Together, findings suggest that NI readers are better able to integrate visual information and modulate their attention to visual stimuli, allowing them to recognize words on the basis of their visual properties, whereas DYS readers recruit altered reading circuits and rely on laborious phonology-based "sounding out" strategies into adulthood. These results deepen our understanding of the neural basis of dyslexia and highlight the importance of synchrony between diverse brain regions for successful reading.
Authors: Damien A Fair; Nico U F Dosenbach; Jessica A Church; Alexander L Cohen; Shefali Brahmbhatt; Francis M Miezin; Deanna M Barch; Marcus E Raichle; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-08-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Bennett A Shaywitz; Pawel Skudlarski; John M Holahan; Karen E Marchione; R Todd Constable; Robert K Fulbright; Daniel Zelterman; Cheryl Lacadie; Sally E Shaywitz Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Bennett A Shaywitz; Sally E Shaywitz; Kenneth R Pugh; W Einar Mencl; Robert K Fulbright; Pawel Skudlarski; R Todd Constable; Karen E Marchione; Jack M Fletcher; G Reid Lyon; John C Gore Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2002-07-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Maki S Koyama; Adriana Di Martino; Clare Kelly; Devika R Jutagir; Jessica Sunshine; Susan J Schwartz; Francisco X Castellanos; Michael P Milham Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Elizabeth S Norton; Jessica M Black; Leanne M Stanley; Hiroko Tanaka; John D E Gabrieli; Carolyn Sawyer; Fumiko Hoeft Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2014-06-20 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Nicole Landi; Jeffrey G Malins; Stephen J Frost; James S Magnuson; Peter Molfese; Kayleigh Ryherd; Jay G Rueckl; William E Mencl; Kenneth R Pugh Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 3.139