| Literature DB >> 24124445 |
Yara Koréissi-Dembélé1, Nadia Fanou-Fogny, Diego Moretti, Stephan Schuth, Romain A M Dossa, Ines Egli, Michael B Zimmermann, Inge D Brouwer.
Abstract
Low iron and high phytic acid content make fonio based meals a poor source of bioavailable iron. Phytic acid degradation in fonio porridge using whole grain cereals as phytase source and effect on iron bioavailability when added to iron fortified fonio meals were investigated. Grains, nuts and seeds collected in Mali markets were screened for phytic acid and phytase activity. We performed an iron absorption study in Beninese women (n = 16), using non-dephytinised fonio porridge (FFP) and dephytinised fonio porridge (FWFP; 75% fonio-25% wheat), each fortified with (57)Fe or (58)Fe labeled FeSO4. Iron absorption was quantified by measuring the erythrocyte incorporation of stable iron isotopes. Phytic acid varied from 0.39 (bambara nut) to 4.26 g/100 g DM (pumpkin seed), with oilseeds values higher than grains and nuts. Phytase activity ranged from 0.17±1.61 (fonio) to 2.9±1.3 phytase unit (PU) per g (whole wheat). Phytic acid was almost completely degraded in FWFP after 60 min of incubation (pH≈5.0, 50°C). Phytate∶iron molar ratios decreased from 23.7∶1 in FFP to 2.7∶1 in FWFP. Iron fortification further reduced phytate∶iron molar ratio to 1.9∶1 in FFP and 0.3∶1 in FWFP, respectively. Geometric mean (95% CI) iron absorption significantly increased from 2.6% (0.8-7.8) in FFP to 8.3% (3.8-17.9) in FWFP (P<0.0001). Dephytinisation of fonio porridge with intrinsic wheat phytase increased fractional iron absorption 3.2 times, suggesting it could be a possible strategy to decrease PA in cereal-based porridges.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24124445 PMCID: PMC3790800 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070613
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Experimental design of iron absorption test with fonio porridge using stable iron isotope.
FFP, Fonio flour porridge; FWFP, fonio + wheat flour porridge; 57FeSO4 and 58FeSO4, ferrous sulfate labeled with Fe isotopes 57Fe and 58Fe, respectively.
Apparent phytase activity and phytic acid content of untreated grains, nuts and seeds.
| Grains, nuts and seeds common name | Botanical name | Phytase activity | Phytic acid (g/100 g dry matter) |
|
| |||
| Fonio |
| 0.17±1.61 | 0.89 |
| Wheat |
| 2.88±1.27 | 0.85 |
|
| |||
| Bambara nut |
| 0.65±7.25 | 0.39 |
|
| |||
| African locust bean |
| 0.54±0.95 | 0.46 |
| Baobab |
| 0.28±3.46 | 1.80 |
| Hibiscus |
| 0.86±7.13 | 1.16 |
| Pumpkin |
| 0.21±5.08 | 4.26 |
Measured at pH 5.0, 45°C.
1 phytase unit (PU) is equivalent to the enzymatic activity that liberates 1 µmol inorganic phosphate per min under specified conditions.
Values represent mean ± SD of triplicate analysis in dry products.
Values are mean of duplicate analysis in wet products.
Figure 2Phytic acid (IP6) content in fonio (75%) - wheat (25%) flour porridge at different incubation time (0 to 240 min).
phytate, phytate∶iron molar ratio and iron absorption from high phytate (without wheat) and low phytate (with wheat) iron-fortified fonio porridges.
| Fonio porridges | Phytate content in portion (mg, wet weight basis) | Phytate-to-iron molar ratio of fonio prorridges | Phytate-to-iron molar ratio of iron fortified fonio prorridges | Iron absorption (%) |
|
| 96.0±16.2 | 23.7∶1 | 1.9∶1 | 2.6 (0.8, 7.8) |
|
| 16.2±4.4 | 2.7∶1 | 0.3∶1 | 8.3 (3.8, 17.9) |
Geometric mean (−SD, +SD).
Values are significantly different (P<0.0001).
Figure 3Comparison of (log) fractional iron absorption between non-dephytinised (without wheat flour, FFP) and dephytinised (with wheat flour, FWFP) fonio porridge (n = 15).
Black lines show mean log fractional iron absorption from each meal. Geometric mean (95% CI) of iron absorption ratio from FFP and FWFP is 2.6 (0.8–7.8) and 8.3 (3.8–17.9) respectively. Log fractional iron absorption between meals significantly different (paired t test, P<0.0001).