Literature DB >> 24124185

Parameter sensitivity analysis of a lumped-parameter model of a chain of lymphangions in series.

Samira Jamalian1, Christopher D Bertram, William J Richardson, James E Moore.   

Abstract

Any disruption of the lymphatic system due to trauma or injury can lead to edema. There is no effective cure for lymphedema, partly because predictive knowledge of lymphatic system reactions to interventions is lacking. A well-developed model of the system could greatly improve our understanding of its function. Lymphangions, defined as the vessel segment between two valves, are the individual pumping units. Based on our previous lumped-parameter model of a chain of lymphangions, this study aimed to identify the parameters that affect the system output the most using a sensitivity analysis. The system was highly sensitive to minimum valve resistance, such that variations in this parameter caused an order-of-magnitude change in time-average flow rate for certain values of imposed pressure difference. Average flow rate doubled when contraction frequency was increased within its physiological range. Optimum lymphangion length was found to be some 13-14.5 diameters. A peak of time-average flow rate occurred when transmural pressure was such that the pressure-diameter loop for active contractions was centered near maximum passive vessel compliance. Increasing the number of lymphangions in the chain improved the pumping in the presence of larger adverse pressure differences. For a given pressure difference, the optimal number of lymphangions increased with the total vessel length. These results indicate that further experiments to estimate valve resistance more accurately are necessary. The existence of an optimal value of transmural pressure may provide additional guidelines for increasing pumping in areas affected by edema.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lumped-parameter model; lymph transport; lymphatic system; mathematical model; parameter sensitivity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24124185      PMCID: PMC3882543          DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00403.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  25 in total

Review 1.  The physiology of the lymphatic system.

Authors:  M A Swartz
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2001-08-23       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  The morphology of the human lymphatic vessels in the head and neck.

Authors:  Wei-Ren Pan; Cara Michelle le Roux; Sidney M Levy; Christopher A Briggs
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.414

3.  Simulation of a chain of collapsible contracting lymphangions with progressive valve closure.

Authors:  C D Bertram; C Macaskill; J E Moore
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Passive pressure-diameter relationship and structural composition of rat mesenteric lymphangions.

Authors:  Elaheh Rahbar; Jon Weimer; Holly Gibbs; Alvin T Yeh; Christopher D Bertram; Michael J Davis; Michael A Hill; David C Zawieja; James E Moore
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.589

5.  Intrinsic increase in lymphangion muscle contractility in response to elevated afterload.

Authors:  Michael J Davis; Joshua P Scallan; John H Wolpers; Mariappan Muthuchamy; Anatoliy A Gashev; David C Zawieja
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.733

6.  Development of a model of a multi-lymphangion lymphatic vessel incorporating realistic and measured parameter values.

Authors:  C D Bertram; C Macaskill; M J Davis; J E Moore
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2013-06-26

Review 7.  Lymphedema.

Authors:  S G Rockson
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Inhibition of the active lymph pump by flow in rat mesenteric lymphatics and thoracic duct.

Authors:  Anatoliy A Gashev; Michael J Davis; David C Zawieja
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Incorporating measured valve properties into a numerical model of a lymphatic vessel.

Authors:  C D Bertram; C Macaskill; J E Moore
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 1.763

Review 10.  Modelling the lymphatic system: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  K N Margaris; R A Black
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.118

View more
  19 in total

1.  Consequences of intravascular lymphatic valve properties: a study of contraction timing in a multi-lymphangion model.

Authors:  Christopher D Bertram; Charlie Macaskill; Michael J Davis; James E Moore
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Determining the combined effect of the lymphatic valve leaflets and sinus on resistance to forward flow.

Authors:  John T Wilson; Raoul van Loon; Wei Wang; David C Zawieja; James E Moore
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  The relationship between lymphangion chain length and maximum pressure generation established through in vivo imaging and computational modeling.

Authors:  Mohammad S Razavi; Tyler S Nelson; Zhanna Nepiyushchikh; Rudolph L Gleason; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  The advection of microparticles, MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells in response to very low Reynolds numbers.

Authors:  Sinéad T Morley; Michael T Walsh; David T Newport
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  Valve-related modes of pump failure in collecting lymphatics: numerical and experimental investigation.

Authors:  C D Bertram; C Macaskill; M J Davis; J E Moore
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2017-07-11

6.  Lymphatic remodelling in response to lymphatic injury in the hind limbs of sheep.

Authors:  Tyler S Nelson; Zhanna Nepiyushchikh; Joshua S T Hooks; Mohammad S Razavi; Tristan Lewis; Cristina C Clement; Merrilee Thoresen; Matthew T Cribb; Mindy K Ross; Rudolph L Gleason; Laura Santambrogio; John F Peroni; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 25.671

7.  Integrated geometric and mechanical analysis of an image-based lymphatic valve.

Authors:  Daniel J Watson; Igor Sazonov; David C Zawieja; James E Moore; Raoul van Loon
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Minimally invasive method for determining the effective lymphatic pumping pressure in rats using near-infrared imaging.

Authors:  Tyler S Nelson; Ryan E Akin; Michael J Weiler; Timothy Kassis; Jeffrey A Kornuta; J Brandon Dixon
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 9.  Primary and secondary lymphatic valve development: molecular, functional and mechanical insights.

Authors:  Eleni Bazigou; John T Wilson; James E Moore
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.514

10.  Pump function curve shape for a model lymphatic vessel.

Authors:  C D Bertram; C Macaskill; J E Moore
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.