Literature DB >> 24123287

Propagation of calibration errors in prospective motion correction using external tracking.

Benjamin Zahneisen1, Brian Keating, Thomas Ernst.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prospective motion correction of MRI scans using an external tracking device (such as a camera) is becoming increasingly popular, especially for imaging of the head. In order for external tracking data to be transformed into the MR scanner reference frame, the pose (i.e., position and orientation) of the camera relative to the scanner--or cross-calibration--must be accurate. In this study, we investigated how errors in cross-calibration affect the accuracy of motion correction feedback in MRI. THEORY AND METHODS: An operator equation is derived describing how calibration errors relate to errors in applied motion compensation. By taking advantage of spherical symmetry and performing a Taylor approximation for small rotation angles, a closed form expression and upper limit for the residual tracking error is provided.
RESULTS: Experiments confirmed theoretical predictions of a bilinear dependence of the residual rotational component on the calibration error and the motion performed, modulated by a sinusoidal dependence on the angle between the calibration error axis and motion axis. The residual translation error is bounded by the sum of the rotation angle multiplied by the translational calibration error plus the linear head displacement multiplied by the calibration error angle.
CONCLUSION: The results make it possible to calculate the required cross-calibration accuracy for external tracking devices for a range of motions. Scans with smaller expected movements require less accuracy in cross-calibration than scans involving larger movements. Typical clinical applications require that the calibration accuracy is substantially below 1 mm and 1°.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; cross-calibration; motion artifacts; optical tracking; prospective motion correction

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24123287      PMCID: PMC3975823          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  7 in total

1.  An embedded optical tracking system for motion-corrected magnetic resonance imaging at 7T.

Authors:  Jessica Schulz; Thomas Siegert; Enrico Reimer; Christian Labadie; Julian Maclaren; Michael Herbst; Maxim Zaitsev; Robert Turner
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of freely moving objects: prospective real-time motion correction using an external optical motion tracking system.

Authors:  M Zaitsev; C Dold; G Sakas; J Hennig; O Speck
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Adaptive technique for high-definition MR imaging of moving structures.

Authors:  R L Ehman; J P Felmlee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Real-time optical motion correction for diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Murat Aksoy; Christoph Forman; Matus Straka; Stefan Skare; Samantha Holdsworth; Joachim Hornegger; Roland Bammer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Navigator accuracy requirements for prospective motion correction.

Authors:  Julian Maclaren; Oliver Speck; Daniel Stucht; Peter Schulze; Jürgen Hennig; Maxim Zaitsev
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Fast noniterative calibration of an external motion tracking device.

Authors:  Benjamin Zahneisen; Chris Lovell-Smith; Michael Herbst; Maxim Zaitsev; Oliver Speck; Brian Armstrong; Thomas Ernst
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Measurement and correction of microscopic head motion during magnetic resonance imaging of the brain.

Authors:  Julian Maclaren; Brian S R Armstrong; Robert T Barrows; K A Danishad; Thomas Ernst; Colin L Foster; Kazim Gumus; Michael Herbst; Ilja Y Kadashevich; Todd P Kusik; Qiaotian Li; Cris Lovell-Smith; Thomas Prieto; Peter Schulze; Oliver Speck; Daniel Stucht; Maxim Zaitsev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of optical and MR-based tracking.

Authors:  Kazim Gumus; Brian Keating; Nathan White; Brian Andrews-Shigaki; Brian Armstrong; Julian Maclaren; Maxim Zaitsev; Anders Dale; Thomas Ernst
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Prospective motion correction enables highest resolution time-of-flight angiography at 7T.

Authors:  Hendrik Mattern; Alessandro Sciarra; Frank Godenschweger; Daniel Stucht; Falk Lüsebrink; Georg Rose; Oliver Speck
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  Prospective motion correction in functional MRI.

Authors:  Maxim Zaitsev; Burak Akin; Pierre LeVan; Benjamin R Knowles
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  False fMRI activation after motion correction.

Authors:  Renat Yakupov; Juan Lei; Michael B Hoffmann; Oliver Speck
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Prospective motion correction using coil-mounted cameras: Cross-calibration considerations.

Authors:  Julian Maclaren; Murat Aksoy; Melvyn B Ooi; Benjamin Zahneisen; Roland Bammer
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 6.  MRI-Driven PET Image Optimization for Neurological Applications.

Authors:  Yuankai Zhu; Xiaohua Zhu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  55 Mn-based fiducial markers for rapid and automated RF coil localization for hyperpolarized 13 C MRI.

Authors:  Michael A Ohliger; Jeremy W Gordon; Lucas Carvajal; Peder E Z Larson; Jao J Ou; Shubhangi Agarwal; Zihan Zhu; Daniel B Vigneron; Cornelius von Morze
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.668

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.