Literature DB >> 24122854

Sonographic fetal weight estimation - is there more to it than just fetal measurements?

Oshri Barel1, Ron Maymon, Zvi Vaknin, Josef Tovbin, Noam Smorgick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different maternal, fetal, and examiner related factors on the accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation (SFWE).
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study analyzing 9064 SFWEs performed within 1 week prior to delivery, including singleton pregnancies with a gestational age of 37 to 42 weeks, was recorded at one medical center from January 2004 to September 2011. Predicted birth weights were calculated according to models by Sabbagha et al., Hadlock et al., and Combs et al. and were compared with the actual birth weight. Effects of different factors on SFWE accuracy were assessed. The systematic error, random error, and mean absolute percentage error were used as measures of accuracy.
RESULTS: High maternal weight, height, body mass index, multiparity, older maternal age, diabetes, and fetal male sex were associated with underestimation of SFWE (P < 0.05). Fetal presentation and the sonographer's experience influenced SFWE differently using various models. The amniotic fluid index did have a significant effect on SFWE. Overall, more than 90% of the systematic errors were unaccounted for in the factors we assessed.
CONCLUSIONS: Many maternal and fetal factors significantly influence the SFWE; nevertheless, most errors are probably due to inherent problems in SFWE formulas.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24122854     DOI: 10.1002/pd.4250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  7 in total

1.  Analysis of factors influencing accuracy of ultrasound-based fetal weight estimation.

Authors:  Sujitkumar Hiwale; Celine Firtion
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2020-07-13

2.  Correlation of ultrasonographic estimated fetal weight with actual birth weight in a tertiary hospital in Lagos, Nigeria.

Authors:  Cletus Uche Eze; Livinus Chibuzo Abonyi; Jerome Njoku; Udo Okorie; Olayinka Owonifari
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.927

3.  Second trimester maternal serum triple screening marker levels in normal twin and singleton pregnancies.

Authors:  Feng Ren; Y U Hu; Huan Zhou; Wen-Ying Zhu; L I Jia; Jing-Jing Xu; Jing Xue
Journal:  Biomed Rep       Date:  2016-02-24

4.  Accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation in full-term singleton pregnant women.

Authors:  Emre Erdem Tas; Edip Alptug Kir; Gamze Yilmaz; Ayse Filiz Yavuz
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

5.  Impact of biometric measurement error on identification of small- and large-for-gestational-age fetuses.

Authors:  D Wright; A Wright; E Smith; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 7.299

6.  Prospective verification of sonographic fetal weight estimators among term parturients in Uganda.

Authors:  Senai Goitom Sereke; Richard Okello Omara; Felix Bongomin; Sarah Nakubulwa; Harriet Nalubega Kisembo
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Observer Influence with Other Variables on the Accuracy of Ultrasound Estimation of Fetal Weight at Term.

Authors:  Mariola Sánchez-Fernández; Maria E Corral; Longinos Aceituno; Marina Mazheika; Nicolás Mendoza; Juan Mozas-Moreno
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.