Literature DB >> 24122145

Prevalence of different forms of infarct-atypical late gadolinium enhancement in patients early and late after heart transplantation.

M F Braggion-Santos, F Andre, D Lossnitzer, E Hofmann, J Simpfendörfer, A Dösch, H A Katus, H Steen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) enables high-resolution myocardial tissue characterization, showing the results of different injuries, especially in the early period after heart transplantation (HTX).
OBJECTIVES: We sought to apply LGE-CMR to investigate the prevalence and patterns of infarct-atypical myocardial involvement and associated mechanisms in patients early and late after HTX.
METHODS: LGE-CMR was performed on a 1.5-T MRI scanner (Philips, Best, the Netherlands) in 89 patients: group 1 (48 patients) less than 2.5 years after operation (1.2 ± 0.5 years) and group 2 (41 patients) later this period (8.2 ± 4.2 years). Following LGE-CMR, the presence, distribution, patterns of infarct-atypical LGE and possible associated mechanisms were assessed.
RESULTS: 71 % of group 1 patients (34/48) showed infarctatypical LGE whereas 57 % of group 2 patients (22/41) were affected (p = 0.25). Fewer segments/patients were involved later after HTX (1.6 ± 2.0 vs. 2.9 ± 3.1 segments/ patient; p = 0.03), but only diffuse LGE-CMR pattern decreased significantly (11.5 % of affected segments in group 1 vs. 6.5 % in group 2; p\0.001). Group 2 had lower ischemic time (181 ± 53 vs. 208 ± 61 min; p = 0.03), the donors were younger (33 ± 13 vs. 41 ± 13 years; p = 0.01) and fewer donors were Toxoplasma gondii seropositive (4 vs. 22pts; p\0.001).
CONCLUSION: Infarct-atypical LGE was found in a significant number of patients early post-HTX, however, fewer patients and myocardial segments per patient were affected later after HTX. Many potential factors seem to be involved, but the exact mechanisms are still unclear. Future studies are necessary to test prognostic implications associated with LGE-CMR patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24122145     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-013-0623-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   5.460


  27 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Late gadolinium enhancement CMR predicts adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients with coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Filip Zemrak; Steffen E Petersen
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.194

3.  The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Twenty-eighth Adult Heart Transplant Report--2011.

Authors:  Josef Stehlik; Leah B Edwards; Anna Y Kucheryavaya; Christian Benden; Jason D Christie; Fabienne Dobbels; Richard Kirk; Axel O Rahmel; Marshall I Hertz
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 4.  The role of multimodality cardiac imaging in the transplanted heart.

Authors:  Jerry D Estep; Dipan J Shah; Sherif F Nagueh; John J Mahmarian; Guillermo Torre-Amione; William A Zoghbi
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-09

5.  Prevalence of different gadolinium enhancement patterns in patients after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Henning Steen; Constanze Merten; Sonja Refle; Roland Klingenberg; Thomas Dengler; Evangelos Giannitsis; Hugo A Katus
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function.

Authors:  R J Kim; D S Fieno; T B Parrish; K Harris; E L Chen; O Simonetti; J Bundy; J P Finn; F J Klocke; R M Judd
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-11-09       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Myocardial scar visualized by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging predicts major adverse events in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Oliver Bruder; Anja Wagner; Christoph J Jensen; Steffen Schneider; Peter Ong; Eva-Maria Kispert; Kai Nassenstein; Thomas Schlosser; Georg V Sabin; Udo Sechtem; Heiko Mahrholdt
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  Update on cardiac transplantation pathology.

Authors:  Carmela D Tan; William M Baldwin; E Rene Rodriguez
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  Toxoplasmosis in heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  A Gallino; M Maggiorini; W Kiowski; X Martin; W Wunderli; J Schneider; M Turina; F Follath
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of acute heart transplant rejection: a review.

Authors:  Craig R Butler; Richard Thompson; Mark Haykowsky; Mustafa Toma; Ian Paterson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  5 in total

1.  Myocardial Fibrosis and Prognosis in Heart Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Andrew Hughes; Osama Okasha; Afshin Farzaneh-Far; Felipe Kazmirczak; Prabhjot S Nijjar; Pratik Velangi; Mehmet Akçakaya; Cindy M Martin; Chetan Shenoy
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 7.792

2.  Assessment of global longitudinal strain using standardized myocardial deformation imaging: a modality independent software approach.

Authors:  Johannes H Riffel; Marius G P Keller; Matthias Aurich; Yannick Sander; Florian Andre; Sorin Giusca; Fabian Aus dem Siepen; Sebastian Seitz; Christian Galuschky; Grigorios Korosoglou; Derliz Mereles; Hugo A Katus; Sebastian J Buss
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  CMR-derived extracellular volume fraction (ECV) in asymptomatic heart transplant recipients: correlations with clinical features and myocardial edema.

Authors:  Yating Yuan; Jie Cai; Yue Cui; Jing Wang; Osamah Alwalid; Xuehua Shen; Yukun Cao; Yan Zou; Bo Liang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Diagnosis and management of coronary allograft vasculopathy in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Nathalie Dedieu; Gerald Greil; James Wong; Matthew Fenton; Michael Burch; Tarique Hussain
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-12-24

5.  Diagnostic performance of late gadolinium enhancement in the assessment of acute cellular rejection after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Evrim Şimşek; Sanem Nalbantgil; Naim Ceylan; Mehdi Zoghi; Hatice Soner Kemal; Çağatay Engin; Tahir Yağdı; Mustafa Özbaran
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 1.596

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.