OBJECTIVES: Molecular imaging of apoptosis is frequently discussed for monitoring cancer therapies. Here, we compare the low molecular weight phosphatidylserine-targeting ligand zinc2+-dipicolylamine (Zn2+-DPA) with the established but reasonably larger protein annexin V. METHODS: Molecular apoptosis imaging with the fluorescently labelled probes annexin V (750 nm, 36 kDa) and Zn2+-DPA (794 nm, 1.84 kDa) was performed in tumour-bearing mice (A431). Three animal groups were investigated: untreated controls and treated tumours after 1 or 4 days of anti-angiogenic therapy (SU11248). Additionally, μPET with 18 F-FDG was performed. Imaging data were displayed as tumour-to-muscle ratio (TMR) and validated by quantitative immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Compared with untreated control tumours, TUNEL staining indicated significant apoptosis after 1 day (P < 0.05) and 4 days (P < 0.01) of treatment. Concordantly, Zn2+-DPA uptake increased significantly after 1 day (P < 0.05) and 4 days (P < 0.01). Surprisingly, annexin V failed to detect significant differences between control and treated animals. Contrary to the increasing uptake of Zn2+-DPA, 18 F-FDG tumour uptake decreased significantly at days 1 (P < 0.05) and 4 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Increase in apoptosis during anti-angiogenic therapy was detected significantly better with the low molecular weight probe Zn2+-DPA than with the annexin V-based probe. Additionally, significant treatment effects were detectable as early using Zn2+-DPA as with measurements of the glucose metabolism using 18 F-FDG. KEY POINTS: • The detection of apoptosis by non-invasive imaging is important in oncology. • A new low molecular weight probe Zn2+-DPA shows promise in depicting anti-angiogenic effects. • The small Zn2+-DPA ligand appears well suited for monitoring therapy. • Treatment effects are detectable just as early with Zn2+-DPA as with 18F-FDG.
OBJECTIVES: Molecular imaging of apoptosis is frequently discussed for monitoring cancer therapies. Here, we compare the low molecular weight phosphatidylserine-targeting ligand zinc2+-dipicolylamine (Zn2+-DPA) with the established but reasonably larger protein annexin V. METHODS: Molecular apoptosis imaging with the fluorescently labelled probes annexin V (750 nm, 36 kDa) and Zn2+-DPA (794 nm, 1.84 kDa) was performed in tumour-bearing mice (A431). Three animal groups were investigated: untreated controls and treated tumours after 1 or 4 days of anti-angiogenic therapy (SU11248). Additionally, μPET with 18 F-FDG was performed. Imaging data were displayed as tumour-to-muscle ratio (TMR) and validated by quantitative immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Compared with untreated control tumours, TUNEL staining indicated significant apoptosis after 1 day (P < 0.05) and 4 days (P < 0.01) of treatment. Concordantly, Zn2+-DPA uptake increased significantly after 1 day (P < 0.05) and 4 days (P < 0.01). Surprisingly, annexin V failed to detect significant differences between control and treated animals. Contrary to the increasing uptake of Zn2+-DPA, 18 F-FDG tumour uptake decreased significantly at days 1 (P < 0.05) and 4 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Increase in apoptosis during anti-angiogenic therapy was detected significantly better with the low molecular weight probe Zn2+-DPA than with the annexin V-based probe. Additionally, significant treatment effects were detectable as early using Zn2+-DPA as with measurements of the glucose metabolism using 18 F-FDG. KEY POINTS: • The detection of apoptosis by non-invasive imaging is important in oncology. • A new low molecular weight probe Zn2+-DPA shows promise in depicting anti-angiogenic effects. • The small Zn2+-DPA ligand appears well suited for monitoring therapy. • Treatment effects are detectable just as early with Zn2+-DPA as with 18F-FDG.
Authors: Leonie Wyffels; Brian D Gray; Christy Barber; Stephen K Moore; James M Woolfenden; Koon Y Pak; Zhonglin Liu Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2011-04-28 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Hendrikus H Boersma; Bas L J H Kietselaer; Leo M L Stolk; Abdelkader Bennaghmouch; Leonard Hofstra; Jagat Narula; Guido A K Heidendal; Chris P M Reutelingsperger Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Barbara J Fueger; Johannes Czernin; Isabel Hildebrandt; Chris Tran; Benjamin S Halpern; David Stout; Michael E Phelps; Wolfgang A Weber Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: H Charles Manning; Nipun B Merchant; A Coe Foutch; John M Virostko; Shelby K Wyatt; Chirayu Shah; Eliot T McKinley; Jingping Xie; Nathan J Mutic; M Kay Washington; Bonnie LaFleur; Mohammed Noor Tantawy; Todd E Peterson; M Sib Ansari; Ronald M Baldwin; Mace L Rothenberg; Darryl J Bornhop; John C Gore; Robert J Coffey Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-11-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Vasilis Ntziachristos; Eyk A Schellenberger; Jorge Ripoll; Doreen Yessayan; Edward Graves; Alexei Bogdanov; Lee Josephson; Ralph Weissleder Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-08-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jacky M K Kwong; Celia Hoang; Reshil T Dukes; Richard W Yee; Brian D Gray; Koon Y Pak; Joseph Caprioli Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Farhan Chaudhry; Hideki Kawai; Kipp W Johnson; Navneet Narula; Aditya Shekhar; Fayzan Chaudhry; Takehiro Nakahara; Takashi Tanimoto; Dongbin Kim; Matthew K M Y Adapoe; Francis G Blankenberg; Jeffrey A Mattis; Koon Y Pak; Phillip D Levy; Yukio Ozaki; Eloisa Arbustini; H William Strauss; Artiom Petrov; Valentin Fuster; Jagat Narula Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Adam J Plaunt; Kara M Harmatys; William R Wolter; Mark A Suckow; Bradley D Smith Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2014-03-13 Impact factor: 4.774