PURPOSE: To evaluate noninvasive molecular imaging methods as correlative biomarkers of therapeutic efficacy of cetuximab in human colorectal cancer cell line xenografts grown in athymic nude mice. The correlation between molecular imaging and immunohistochemical analysis to quantify epidermal growth factor (EGF) binding, apoptosis, and proliferation was evaluated in treated and untreated tumor-bearing cohorts. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Optical imaging probes targeting EGF receptor (EGFR) expression (NIR800-EGF) and apoptosis (NIR700-Annexin V) were synthesized and evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Proliferation was assessed by 3'-[18F]fluoro-3'-deoxythymidine ([18F]FLT) positron emission tomography. Assessment of inhibition of EGFR signaling by cetuximab was accomplished by concomitant imaging of NIR800-EGF, NIR700-Annexin V, and [18F]FLT in cetuximab-sensitive (DiFi) and insensitive (HCT-116) human colorectal cancer cell line xenografts. Imaging results were validated by measurement of tumor size and immunohistochemical analysis of total and phosphorylated EGFR, caspase-3, and Ki-67 immediately following in vivo imaging. RESULTS: NIR800-EGF accumulation in tumors reflected relative EGFR expression and EGFR occupancy by cetuximab. NIR700-Annexin V accumulation correlated with cetuximab-induced apoptosis as assessed by immunohistochemical staining of caspase-3. No significant difference in tumor proliferation was noted between treated and untreated animals by [18F]FLT positron emission tomography or Ki-67 immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular imaging can accurately assess EGF binding, proliferation, and apoptosis in human colorectal cancer xenografts. These imaging approaches may prove useful for serial, noninvasive monitoring of the biological effects of EGFR inhibition in preclinical studies. It is anticipated that these assays can be adapted for clinical use.
PURPOSE: To evaluate noninvasive molecular imaging methods as correlative biomarkers of therapeutic efficacy of cetuximab in humancolorectal cancer cell line xenografts grown in athymic nude mice. The correlation between molecular imaging and immunohistochemical analysis to quantify epidermal growth factor (EGF) binding, apoptosis, and proliferation was evaluated in treated and untreated tumor-bearing cohorts. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Optical imaging probes targeting EGF receptor (EGFR) expression (NIR800-EGF) and apoptosis (NIR700-Annexin V) were synthesized and evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Proliferation was assessed by 3'-[18F]fluoro-3'-deoxythymidine ([18F]FLT) positron emission tomography. Assessment of inhibition of EGFR signaling by cetuximab was accomplished by concomitant imaging of NIR800-EGF, NIR700-Annexin V, and [18F]FLT in cetuximab-sensitive (DiFi) and insensitive (HCT-116) humancolorectal cancer cell line xenografts. Imaging results were validated by measurement of tumor size and immunohistochemical analysis of total and phosphorylated EGFR, caspase-3, and Ki-67 immediately following in vivo imaging. RESULTS: NIR800-EGF accumulation in tumors reflected relative EGFR expression and EGFR occupancy by cetuximab. NIR700-Annexin V accumulation correlated with cetuximab-induced apoptosis as assessed by immunohistochemical staining of caspase-3. No significant difference in tumor proliferation was noted between treated and untreated animals by [18F]FLT positron emission tomography or Ki-67 immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular imaging can accurately assess EGF binding, proliferation, and apoptosis in humancolorectal cancer xenografts. These imaging approaches may prove useful for serial, noninvasive monitoring of the biological effects of EGFR inhibition in preclinical studies. It is anticipated that these assays can be adapted for clinical use.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Mace L Rothenberg; Bonnie LaFleur; Donna E Levy; Mary Kay Washington; Sherry L Morgan-Meadows; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Jordan D Berlin; Al B Benson; Robert J Coffey Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-12-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jeffrey W Keller; Jeffrey L Franklin; Ramona Graves-Deal; David B Friedman; Corbin W Whitwell; Robert J Coffey Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 6.384
Authors: M E Gross; M A Zorbas; Y J Danels; R Garcia; G E Gallick; M Olive; M G Brattain; B M Boman; L C Yeoman Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1991-03-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: S Untawale; M A Zorbas; C P Hodgson; R J Coffey; G E Gallick; S M North; D M Wildrick; M Olive; M Blick; L C Yeoman Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1993-04-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Ning Guo; Jingping Xie; H Charles Manning; Natasha G Deane; M Sib Ansari; Robert J Coffey; John Gore; Ronald R Price; Ronald M Baldwin; J Oliver McIntyre Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Matthew R Hight; Donald D Nolting; Eliot T McKinley; Adam D Lander; Shelby K Wyatt; Mark Gonyea; Ping Zhao; H Charles Manning Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2011 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Bryan A Smith; Shuzhang Xiao; William Wolter; James Wheeler; Mark A Suckow; Bradley D Smith Journal: Apoptosis Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Karin Palmowski; Anne Rix; Wiltrud Lederle; Florian F Behrendt; Felix M Mottaghy; Brian D Gray; Koon Y Pak; Moritz Palmowski; Fabian Kiessling Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Marybeth A Pysz; Olga V Leontieva; Nicholas W Bateman; Joshua M Uronis; Kathryn J Curry; David W Threadgill; Klaus-Peter Janssen; Sylvie Robine; Anna Velcich; Leonard H Augenlicht; Adrian R Black; Jennifer D Black Journal: Exp Cell Res Date: 2009-02-14 Impact factor: 3.905